1887
Volume 25, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

Unlike the short and specific advice of service-encounters, advice in counselling settings is longer and more complex. In these interactions, it is known that advice is initially resisted in all languages. Scholars have tried to explain this phenomenon in terms of ‘face loss’ (Brown and Levinson 1987; Goldsmith 1992, 1994; Hinkel 1994; Murakami 1994); premature delivery (Heritage and Sefi 1992); the inappropriateness of the advisors (Jefferson and Lee 1992); or discrepancies in the interpretation of a problem (Murakami 1994). One of the difficulties in counselling or therapeutic settings is that the giving of advice in these interactions is a ‘process’ that is long and complex. In order to understand advice resistance, it is essential, first and foremost, to identify the characteristics of advice and how it is delivered. The present analysis of Japanese radio phone-in programs focuses on advice in order to identify its formal characteristics and also to try to understand the factors that determine its acceptance or resistance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.25.2.06tan
2015-06-01
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abe, Keiko
    (2006) ‘How may I help you?’ Advice by radio in Japan and the U.S.. In A. M. Hornero Corsico , M.J. Luzón , and S. Murillo Ornat (eds.), Corpus Linguistics: Applications for The Study of English. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 79–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Altman, Roann
    (1990) Giving and taking advice without offence. In R. Scarcella , E. Andersen , and S. Krashen (eds.), Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language. New York: Newbury House, pp. 95–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bach, Kent , and Robert Harnish
    (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
    (1987) Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different?Journal of Pragmatics11.2: 131–146. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(87)90192‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90192-5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, Penelope , and Steven Levinson
    (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Culpeper, Jonathan
    (2005) Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research1: 35–72. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2011) Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  8. Culpeper, Jonathan , Robert Crawshaw , and Julia Harrison
    (2008) ‘Activity types’ and ‘discourse types’: Mediating ‘advice’ in interactions between foreign language assistants and their supervisors in schools in France and England. Multilingua27: 297–324. doi: 10.1515/MULTI.2008.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2008.015 [Google Scholar]
  9. DeCapua, Andrea , and Joan F. Dunham
    (1993) Strategies in the discourse of advice. Journal of Pragmatics20.6: 519–539. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90014‑G
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90014-G [Google Scholar]
  10. Gaik, Frank
    (1992) Radio show therapy and the pragmatics of possible worlds. In A. Duranti , and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 271–290.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Geis, Michael
    (1995) Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554452
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554452 [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldsmith, Daena J
    (1992) Managing conflicting goals in supportive interaction: An integrative theoretical framework. Communication Research19: 264–286. doi: 10.1177/009365092019002007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019002007 [Google Scholar]
  13. (1994) The role of face work in supportive communication. In B.R. Burleson , T.L. Albrecht , and I. Sarason (eds.), The Communication of Support: Messages, Interactions, Relationships, and Community. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 29–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1999) Content-based resource for giving face sensitive advice in troubles talk episodes. Research on Language and Social Interaction32.4: 303–336. doi: 10.1207/S15327973rls3204_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973rls3204_1 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2000) Soliciting advice: The role of sequential placement in mitigating face threat. Communication Monographs67: 1–19. doi: 10.1080/03637750009376492
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376492 [Google Scholar]
  16. Grice, Paul
    (1978) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole , and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Have, Paul ten
    (1993) Talk and institution: A reconsideration of the “asymmetry” of doctor-patient interaction. In D. Boden , and D. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and Social Structure. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 138–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (1999) Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Haviland, John
    (1989) Sure, sure: Evidence and affect. Text9.1: 27−68.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hayashi, Makoto
    (2003) Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/sidag.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.12 [Google Scholar]
  21. Heritage, John , and Paul Drew
    (1992) Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Heritage, John , and Sue Sefi
    (1992) Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first-time mothers. In P. Drew , and J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 359–417.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Heritage, John
    (1985) Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse and Dialogue. London: Academic Press, pp. 95−117.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hinkel, Eli
    (1994) Appropriateness of advice as L2 solidarity strategy. RELC Journal25.2: 71–93. doi: 10.1177/003368829402500205
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829402500205 [Google Scholar]
  25. (1997) Appropriateness of advice: DCT and multiple choice data. Applied Linguistics18.1: 1– 26. doi: 10.1093/applin/18.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  26. Horiguchi, Junko
    (1997) Japanese Conversation by Learners and Native Speakers. Tokyo: Kuroshio.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hoshino, Yuko
    (2005) Positive politeness in Japanese advice giving. Ningen Bunka Rongyo8: 317–326.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hudson, Thom
    (1990) The discourse of advice giving in English: I wouldn’t feed till spring no matter what you do. Language and Communication10.4: 285–297. doi: 10.1016/0271‑5309(90)90014‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(90)90014-3 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hutchby, Ian
    (1995) Aspects of recipient design in expert advice-giving on call-in radio. Discourse Processes19.2: 219–38. doi: 10.1080/01638539509544915
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544915 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jefferson, Gail , and John R.E. Lee
    (1992) The rejection of advice: managing the problematic convergence of a “troubles’ teller” and a “service encounter”. In P. Drew , and J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at Work.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 521–548. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(81)90026‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(81)90026-6 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kissine, Mikhail
    (2013) Form Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511842191
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511842191 [Google Scholar]
  32. Leech, Geoffrey
    (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Leppänen, Vesa
    (1998) The straightforwardness of advice: Advice-giving in interactions between Swedish district nurses and patients. Research on Language and Social Interaction31.2: 209–239. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3102_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3102_3 [Google Scholar]
  34. Levinson, Stephen
    (1992) Activity types and language. In P. Drew , and J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 66–100. doi: 10.1515/ling.1979.17.5‑6.365
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1979.17.5-6.365 [Google Scholar]
  35. Locher, Miriam
    (2006) Advice Online. Advice-giving in an American Internet Health ColumnAmsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.149
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.149 [Google Scholar]
  36. Murakami, Megumi
    (1994) Resistance to advice and negotiation process: A case study of radio-advising sessions. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Hiroshima University43: 327–338.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (1995) Persuasion behavior in radio-advising sessions. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Hiroshima University2: 219–229.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Nakamura, Kazuo , and Yoshio Kashida
    (2004) Jogensha-soodansha toiu shoochi. Shakaigaku Hyooron55.2: 80–97. doi: 10.4057/jsr.55.80
    https://doi.org/10.4057/jsr.55.80 [Google Scholar]
  39. Narrog, Heiko
    (2009) Modality in Japanese: The Layered Structure of the Clause and Hierarchies of Functional Categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/slcs.109
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.109 [Google Scholar]
  40. Nitta, Yoshio
    (1999) Nihongo no Modaritii to Ninshoo. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sacks, Harvey
    (1986) On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. Gumperz , and D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 325– 245. (Original work published 1972).
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Searle, John
    (1975) Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole , and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 59–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Shibamoto, Janet
    (1992) Women in charge: Politeness and directives in the speech of Japanese women. Language in Society21.1: 59–82. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500015037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500015037 [Google Scholar]
  44. Shima, Hiroko
    (1993) Joshi no hyoogen ‘taradoodesuka’ ‘sureba?’ o megutte: poraitonesu no kanten kara. Kanazawa University Journal of Education Center for Foreign Students2: 13–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Suzuki, Kyoko
    (2002) Rajio no iryo soodan no danwa no koozoobunseki. Waseda University Japanese Education Department Bulletin1: 117–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (2003) Rajio no shinri soodan no danwa no koozo bunseki. Waseda University Japanese Education Department Bulletin3: 57–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (2007) Kinoobunkei ni motozuku danwa no koozoo bunseki. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Waseda University.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Szatrowski, Polly
    (1994) Nihongo no Danwa no Koozoo Bunseki. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Tanaka, Lidia
    (2004) Language, Gender and Culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/slcs.69
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.69 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2006) Turn-taking in Japanese Television Interviews: A Study on Interviewers’ Strategies. Pragmatics16.2/3: 361–398. doi: 10.1075/prag.16.2‑3.05tan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.16.2-3.05tan [Google Scholar]
  51. (2014) Impoliteness in Japanese: Delivery and reception of FTAs in Japanese Radio Phone-in programs. Unpublished manuscript.
  52. Terkourafi, Marina
    (2011) The puzzle of indirect speech. Journal of Pragmatics43: 2861−2865. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.003 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.25.2.06tan
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Advice , Counselling , Japanese and Radio phone-in
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error