Volume 25, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


Interactants’ non-reciprocal use of Japanese speech styles, i.e., the addressee honorific form and the non-honorific plain form, is frequently treated as the salient feature constituting speakers’ hierarchical identities. The hierarchical identities in question in this study are ‘senior-junior’relationships among Japanese college students. The paper presents analyses that demonstrate that the construction of these hierarchical relationships depends on context. The data derive from nine hours of audio recordings of dyadic and multiparty interactions among college students at the meetings of an extracurricular club. Conceptualizing on-stage and off-stage as frames of talk that function as context in this data set, the study finds that hierarchical identities are not foregrounded during on-stage talk, but can be foregrounded during off-stage talk when the participants’ club roles are not foregrounded; the use of non-reciprocal speech styles that lead to hierarchical identity construction is observed in this situation. On the other hand, hierarchical identities are backgrounded during on-stage talk when the participants’ club roles are foregrounded. The use of the addressee honorific form in this situation indexes that the speaker is engaged in a club role, such as discussion leader or participant.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aoki, Haruo
    (1986) Evidentials in Japanese. In W. Chafe , and J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Ablex: Norwood, pp. 223-238.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bucholtz, M. , and K. Hall
    (2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies7.4-5: 585-614. doi: 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bunka Shingikai Kokugo Bunkakai [The Subdivision on National Language of the Council for Cultural Affairs]
    (2007) Keego no shishin [Guidelines for honorific expressions]. Government publication. www.bunka.go.jp/bunkashingikai/soukai/pdf/keigo_tousin.pdf
  4. Burr, Vivien
    (1995) An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Sage. doi: 10.4324/9780203299968
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203299968 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook, Haruko M
    (1996a) Japanese language socialization: Indexing the modes of self. Discourse Processes22: 171-197. doi: 10.1080/01638539609544971
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544971 [Google Scholar]
  6. (1996b) The use of addressee honorifics in Japanese elementary school classrooms. In N. Akatsuka , S. Iwasaki , and S. Strauss (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 5. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 43-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1997) The role of the Japanese masu form in caregiver-child conversation. Journal of Pragmatics28: 695-718. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)00071‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00071-4 [Google Scholar]
  8. (1998) Situational meanings of Japanese social deixis: The mixed use of the masu and plain forms. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology8.1: 87-110. doi: 10.1525/jlin.1998.8.1.87
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1998.8.1.87 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2002) The social meanings of the Japanese plain form. In N. Akatsuka , S. Strauss , and B. Comrie (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 150-163.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2006) Japanese politeness as an interactional achievement: Academic consultation sessions in Japanese universities. Multilingua25: 269-291. doi: 10.1515/MULTI.2006.016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2006.016 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2008a) Socializing Identities through Speech Style: Learners of Japanese as a Foreign Language. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2008b) Construction of speech styles: The case of the Japanese naked plain Form. In J. Mori , and A.S. Ohta (eds.), Japanese Applied Linguistics: Discourse and Social Perspectives. London: Continuum, pp. 80-108.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dunn, Cynthia Dickel
    (1996) Style and genre in Japanese women’s discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Austin: University of Texas.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1999) Public and private voices: Japanese style shifting and the display of affective intensity. In G.B. Palmer , and D.J. Occhi (eds.), Languages of Sentiment. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 107-127. doi: 10.1075/aicr.18.06dic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.18.06dic [Google Scholar]
  15. Duranti, Alessandro
    (1997) Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511810190
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810190 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gergen, Kenneth J
    (1985) The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist40.3: 266-275. doi: 10.1037/0003‑066X.40.3.266
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.3.266 [Google Scholar]
  17. Geyer, Naomi
    (2008a) Interpersonal functions of style shift: The use of plain and masu forms in faculty meetings. In K. Jones , and T. Ono (eds.), Style Shifting in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 39-70. doi: 10.1075/pbns.180.00int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.180.00int [Google Scholar]
  18. (2008b) Discourse and Politeness: Ambivalent Face in Japanese. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Goffman, Erving
    (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Goodwin, C
    ., and A. Duranti (1992) Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti , and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hanks, William F
    (2001) Indexicality. In A. Duranti (ed.), Key Terms in Language and Culture. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 119-121.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ide, Sachiko
    (1989) Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua8.2/3: 223-248. doi: 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ikuta, Shoko
    (2008) Speech style shift as an interactional discourse strategy: The use and non-use of desu/-masu in Japanese conversational interviews. In K. Jones , and T. Ono (eds.), Style Shifting in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 71-89. doi: 10.1075/pbns.180.00speech
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.180.00speech [Google Scholar]
  24. MacWhinney, B. and Y. Oshima-Takane
    (eds.) (1998) CHILDES Manual for Japanese. Montreal: McGill University.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Makino, Seiichi
    (2002) When does the communication turn mentally inward?: A case study of Japanese formal-to-informal switching. In N. Akatsuka , and S. Strauss (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 121-135.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Makino, S. , and M. Tsutsui
    (1989) A Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar. Tokyo: The Japan Times.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Martin, Samuel E
    (1964) Speech levels in Japan and Korea. In D. Hymes (ed.), Language in Culture and Society. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 121-135.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2004) A Reference Grammar of Japanese. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Maynard, Senko
    (1991) Pragmatics of discourse modality: A case of da and desu/masu forms in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics15: 551-582. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(91)90111‑A
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90111-A [Google Scholar]
  30. (2008) Playing with multiple voices: Emotivity and creativity in Japanese style mixture. In K. Jones , and T. Ono (eds.), Style Shifting in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 91-130. doi: 10.1075/pbns.180.00pla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.180.00pla [Google Scholar]
  31. McGloin, Naomi Hanaoka
    (2002) Markers of epistemic vs. affective stances: Deshoo vs. zyanai. In N. Akatsuka , and S. Strauss (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 136-149.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mizutani, O. , and N. Mizutani
    (1987) How to Be Polite in Japanese. Tokyo: The Japan Times.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Nakane, Chie
    (1972) Japanese Society. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work: Tateshakai no Ningen Kankee [Human Relations within Vertical Society] published 1967 in Japanese).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Niyekawa, Agnes M
    (1991) Minimum Essential Politeness: A Guide to the Japanese Honorific Language. Tokyo: Kodansha International.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ochs, Elinor
    (1990) Indexicality and socialization. In G. Herdt , R. Shweder , and J. Stigler (eds.), Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287-307. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173728.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173728.009 [Google Scholar]
  36. (1992) Indexing gender. In A. Duranti , and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 335-358.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (1993) Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction26.3: 287-306. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3 [Google Scholar]
  38. (1996) Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In J. Gumperz , and S. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 407-437.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Okamoto, Shigeko
    (1997) Social context, linguistic ideology, and indexical expressions in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics28.6: 795-817. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)81491‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)81491-9 [Google Scholar]
  40. (1998) The use and non-use of honorifics in sales talk in Kyoto and Osaka: Are they rude or friendly?In N. Akatsuka , H. Hoji , S. Iwasaki , S. Sohn , and S. Strauss (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 7. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 141-157.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (1999) Situated politeness: Cordinating honorific and non-honorific expressions. Pragmatics9.1: 51-74. doi: 10.1075/prag.9.1.05oka
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.05oka [Google Scholar]
  42. Peirce, Charles S
    (1955) Philosophical Writings of Peirce ( J. Buchler , ed.). New York: Dover.
  43. Rohlen, Thomas P
    (1991) Up and down. In B. Finkelstein , A.E. Imanuma , and J.J. Tobin (eds.), Transcending Stereotypes: Discovering Japanese Culture and Education. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press, pp. 20-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    (1990) The Languages of Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Shin, Kimie
    (2004) How are speech styles elaborated for presenting individual personality while bearing in mind social norms?: Certain cases in Beppu city, Oita Prefecture, Japan. Collegium Antropologicum28 (Suppl. 1): 123-130.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Silverstein, Michael
    (1976) Shifters, linguistic categories and cultural description. In K. Basso , and H. Selby (eds.), Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico, pp. 11-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (1985) Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In E. Mertz , and R.J. Parmentier (eds.), Semantic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives. Orland: Academic Press, pp. 219-259. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑491280‑9.50016‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-491280-9.50016-9 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sturtz Sreetharan, Cindi
    (2006) “I read the Nikkei, too”: Crafting positions of authority and masculinity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology16.2: 173-193. doi: 10.1525/jlin.2006.16.2.173
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2006.16.2.173 [Google Scholar]
  49. Zimmerman, Don H
    (1998) Identity, context and interaction. In C. Antaki , and S. Widdicombe (eds.), Identities in Talk. London: Sage, pp. 87-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): context; identities; Indexicality; Japanese speech styles
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error