1887
Volume 25, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

This paper reports the first empirical results aiming to characterize argumentative practices in Chile. We described features of Chilean interpersonal arguing among university students, compared those results with others obtained in the United States, and also compared the associations among variables from country to country. Chilean men displayed more aggressive and self-oriented arguing profiles than Chilean women. Compared to U.S. Americans, Chileans were more motivated to argue and saw the practice of arguing as more cooperative and civil. Many results and correlational patterns were recognizable from one nation to the other, but some differences deserve notice. For example, several measures that are routinely seen as opposites in the U.S. (e.g., impulses to approach or avoid arguing) have only modest negative correlations in the Chilean data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.25.3.06san
2015-09-01
2019-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Avtgis, Theodore A. , Andrew S. Rancer , Penka. A. Kanjeva , and Rebecca M. Chory
    (2008) Argumentative and aggressive communication in Bulgaria: Testing for conceptual and methodological equivalence. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research37: 17-24. doi: 10.1080/17475750802077354
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750802077354 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baño, Rodrigo , Carlos Ruiz , and María Eugenia Ruiz-Tagle
    (2008) Enzo Faletto: Obras Completas. Tomo I. Santiago: Random House Mondadori.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cademartori, Yanina , and Dolores Parra
    (2004) Reforma educativa y teoría de la argumentación. Revista Signos33.48: 69-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cionea, Ioana A. , Dale Hample , and Fabio Paglieri
    (2011) A test of the argument engagement model in Romania. In F. Zenker (ed.), Argument cultures: Proceedings of the 8th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18-21, 2011. Windsor, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cordero, Marcela
    (2004) El componente ‘tesis’ en los textos argumentativos escolares. Revista Signos33.48: 87-96.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Crespo, Nina
    (2005) La importancia de la argumentación matemática en el aula. Premisa. Revista de la Sociedad Argentina de Educación Matemática7.23: 23-29.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Croucher, Stephen
    (2013) The difference in verbal aggressiveness between the United States and Thailand. Communication Research Reports30.3: 264-269. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2013.806255
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2013.806255 [Google Scholar]
  8. Croucher, Stephen M. , Deepa Oommen , Manda V. Hicks , Kyle J. Holody , Samura Yoon Anarbaeva , Spencer Antony T. Kisung , Chrishawn Marsh , and Abdulrahman I. Aljahli
    (2010) The effects of self-construal and religiousness on argumentativeness: A cross-cultural analysis. Communication Studies61: 135-155. doi: 10.1080/10510971003603994
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10510971003603994 [Google Scholar]
  9. Croucher, Stephen M. , Rand Otten , Methan Ball , Tamara Grimes , Brett Ainsworth , Kieran Begley , and Laci Corzo
    (2013) Argumentativeness and political participation: A cross-cultural analysis in the United States and Turkey. Communication Studies64.1: 18-32. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2012.727942
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2012.727942 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dillard, James
    (1990) A goal-driven model of interpersonal influence. In J.P. Dillard (ed.), Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick, pp. 41-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dillard, James Price , Chris Segrin , and Janie M. Harden
    (1989) Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs56: 19-38. doi: 10.1080/03637758909390247
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758909390247 [Google Scholar]
  12. Eysenck, H.J. , and S.B.G. Eysenck
    (1975) Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Eysenck, S.B.G. , H.J. Eysenck , and Paul Barrett
    (1985) A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Difference6: 21-29. doi: 10.1016/0191‑8869(85)90026‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1 [Google Scholar]
  14. González, Cristian
    (2009) La interacción verbal argumentativa en la sala de clases: La participación de los alumnos y el rol de profesor. RLA47.1: 125-144.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodnight, Thomas
    (1982) The personal, technical, and public spheres of argument: A speculative inquiry into the art of public deliberation. Journal of the American Forensic Association18: 214-227.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hamilton, Mark A. , and Dale Hample
    (2011) Testing hierarchical models of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness. Communication Methods and Measures5: 250-273. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2011.596991
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2011.596991 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hample, Dale
    (2003) Arguing skill. In J.O. Greene , and B.R. Burleson (eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 439-478.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2005) Arguing: Exchanging reasons face to face. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hample, Dale , and Deepa Anagondahalli
    (2015) Understandings of arguing in India and the United States: Argument frames, personalization of conflict, argumentativeness, and verbal aggressiveness. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research44: 1-26. doi: 10.1080/17475759.2014.1000939
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2014.1000939 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hample, Dale , and Judith M. Dallinger
    (1987) Cognitive editing of argument strategies. Human Communication Research14: 123-144. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1987.tb00124.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00124.x [Google Scholar]
  21. (1992) The use of multiple goals in cognitive editing of arguments. Argumentation and Advocacy28: 109-122.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hample, Dale , Adam S. Richards , and Christina Skubisz
    (2013) Blurting. Communication Monographs80: 503-532. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2013.830316
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2013.830316 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hample, Dale , Benjamin Warner , and Dorian Young
    (2009) Framing and editing interpersonal arguments. Argumentation23: 21-37. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑008‑9107‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-008-9107-x [Google Scholar]
  24. Herrera, Florencia , and Berta Teitelboim
    (2011) La mirada de los chilenos a la familia. In Sexta encuesta nacional UDP. Chile 2010: Percepciones y actitudes sociales. Santiago: ICSO-UDP, pp. 121-135.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hrdy, Sarah
    (2009) Mothers and Others. The Evolutionary origins of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Infante, Dominic A. , and Andrew S. Rancer
    (1982) A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment46: 72-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4601_13
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4601_13 [Google Scholar]
  27. Infante, Dominic A. , and Charles J. Wigley
    (1986) Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs53: 61-69. doi: 10.1080/03637758609376126
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758609376126 [Google Scholar]
  28. Jélvez, Lorena
    (2008) Esquemas argumentativos en textos escritos: un estudio descriptivo en alumnos de tercero medio de dos establecimientos de Valparaíso. Cyber Humanitatis45: 1-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Johnson, Amy
    (2002) Beliefs about arguing: A comparison of public issue and personal issue arguments. Communication Reports15: 99-112. doi: 10.1080/08934210209367757
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210209367757 [Google Scholar]
  30. Larraín, Antonia , and Paulina Freire
    (2012) El uso de discurso argumentativo en la enseñanza de ciencias: Un estudio exploratorio. Estudios Pedagógicos38.2: 133-155. doi: 10.4067/S0718‑07052012000200009
    https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052012000200009 [Google Scholar]
  31. Marinkovich, Juana
    (2007a) Las estrategias cognitivo-retóricas y la dimensión dialéctica de la argumentación oral en una clase de lengua castellana y comunicación. Revista Signos40.63: 127-146. doi: 10.4067/S0718‑09342007000100007
    https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342007000100007 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2007b) La interacción argumentativa en el aula: Fases de la argumentación y estrategias de cortesía verbal. In C. Santibáñez , and B. Riffo (eds.), Estudios en Argumentación y Retórica. Teorías contemporáneas y aplicaciones. Concepción: Universidad de Concepción Press, pp. 227-252.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Marinkovich, Juana , and Pilar Morán
    (1995) La calidad del texto argumentativo en estudiantes de 4 medio: Algunos rasgos significativos. Estudios Filológicos30: 48-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. McCroskey, James
    (1978) Validity of the PRCA as an index of oral communication apprehension. Communication Monographs45: 192-203. doi: 10.1080/03637757809375965
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757809375965 [Google Scholar]
  35. Meza, Paulina
    (2009) Las interacciones argumentativas orales en la sala de clases: Un análisis dialéctico y retórico. Unpublished Master Thesis, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile.
  36. O’Ryan, Raúl , Carlos de Miguel , and Camilo Lagos
    (2007) Evaluación de Estrategias de Desarrollo para Alcanzar los Objetivos del Milenio en América Latina. El Caso de Chile. Santiago: PNUD.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Moulian, Tomás
    (2009) Contradicciones del desarrollo político chileno: 1920-1990. Santiago: Ediciones LOM.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Parodi, Giovanni
    (2000) La evaluación de la producción de textos escritos argumentativos: Una alternancia cognitivo/discursiva. Revista Signos33.47: 151-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Poblete, Claudia
    (2003) Relación entre competencia textual argumentativa y metacognición. Unpublished doctoral dissertationPontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso.
  40. Puga, Juana
    (1997) La Atenuación en el Castellano de Chile. Un enfoque pragmalingüístico. Valencia: Universitat de Valéncia.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Rancer, Andrew S. , and Theodore A. Avtgis
    (2014) Argumentative and aggressive communication. 2d. Ed. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Salazar, Juan
    (2008) Estrategias de cortesía verbal en interacciones argumentativas ocurridas en contexto escolar. Alpha27: 77-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Santibáñez, Cristián
    (2006) Retórica y argumentación en la política de sentencias populares. Praxis: Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Humanas9: 183-196.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (2010) Metaphors and argumentation: The Case of Chilean Parliamentarian Media Participation. Journal of Pragmatics42.4: 973-989. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.019 [Google Scholar]
  45. Singelis, Theodore
    (1994) The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin20: 580-591. doi: 10.1177/0146167294205014
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205014 [Google Scholar]
  46. Torche, Florencia , and Guillermo Wormald
    (2004) Estratificación y movilidad social en Chile: Entre la adscripción y el logro. Serie Políticas públicas98: 1-85.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Vicuña, Ana , and Juana Marinkovich
    (2008) Un análisis de la discusión acerca de temas controversiales en Enseñanza Media desde la pragma-dialéctica. Revista Signos41.68: 439-457.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Vitale, Luis
    (2001) Balance de dos décadas de Neoliberalismo. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wittig, Fernando
    (2005) Perspectivas argumentales en disputa en torno a la distribución de la ‘píldora del días después’. Alpha21: 159-175.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Xie, Yun , Dale Hample , and Xiaoli Wang
    (in press) A cross-cultural analysis of argument predispositions in China: Argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, argument frames, and personalization of conflict. Argumentation. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9352‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9352-8 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.25.3.06san
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Argument frames , Chile , Cooperativeness , Individualism and Interpersonal arguing
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error