Volume 25, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


Informal, online environments facilitate creative self-expression through typographic and orthographic stylistics. Yet, ideologies of writing may be invoked to discourage written forms that are purportedly difficult to read. This paper analyzes how members of an online, text-based, gaming community negotiate appropriate, written communications as expressions of technical identity. These encounters may reify communities of technologists who are associated with using or avoiding forms such as abbreviations, capital letters, and “leet speak.” Amid the technologizing of the word, the paper argues that those who do not conform to assumed norms may be indexed as less technical than those who do. By examining troubled encounters, the paper explores how metapragmatic negotiations affect creativity and technical identity performance online. The paper argues that contrary to discourses that online interactants pay little attention to written stylistics, the present participants closely attended to subtle and small forms. Further, it discusses how ideologies may be idiosyncratically applied to assist in forming asymmetrical, technical identities. Finally, it argues that technical affiliations are just as important to study as other variables such as gender, ethnicity, age, and class that have traditionally received attention in analyses of ideologies of writing and New Literacy Studies.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Anderson, Benedict
    (1983) Imagined Communities. London: Verso Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Androutsopoulos, Jannis K
    (2000) Non-standard spellings in media texts: The case of German fanzines. Journal of Sociolinguistics4.4: 514-533. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00128
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00128 [Google Scholar]
  3. Angell, David , and Brent Heslop
    (1994) The Elements of E-mail Style: Communicate Effectively via Electronic Mail. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barton, David , and Mary Hamilton
    (2000) Literacy practices. In D. Barton , M. Hamilton , and R. Ivanic (eds.), Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context. New York: Routledge, pp. 7-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blashki, Katherine , and Sophie Nichol
    (2005) Game geek’s goss: Linguistic creativity in young males within an online university forum. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society3.2: 77-86.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blommaert, Jan
    (2004) Writing as a problem: African grassroots writing, economies of literacy, and globalization. Language in Society33.5: 643-671. doi: 10.1017/S0047404504045014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404504045014 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bucholtz, Mary
    (1999) Why be normal? Language and identity practice in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society28: 203-223.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Carooso, Jeff
    (2004) Are you l33t?Network World. May17 2004 21.20: 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cherny, Lynn
    (1999) Conversation and Community: Chat in a Virtual World. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Curtis, Pavel
    (1992) Mudding: Social phenomena in text-based virtual realities. w2.eff.org/Net_culture/MOO_MUD_IRC/curtis_mudding.article
  11. Danet, Janet
    (2001) Cyberpl@y: Communicating Online. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Eagleton, Terry
    (1991) Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Frekko, Susan
    (this volume) Standardizing opinion: Projecting a national Catalan public through letters to the editor. Pragmatics25.4: 589-615.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gee, James Paul
    (1996) Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. New York: Routledge Falmer.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
    (1990) He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization Among Black Children. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goffman, Erving
    (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York and London: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Grice, Paul
    (1999) [1975] Logic and conversation. In A. Jaworski , and N. Coupland (eds.), The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 76- 88.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Halliday, Michael A.K
    (1976) Anti-languages. American Anthropologist78.3: 570-584. doi: 10.1525/aa.1976.78.3.02a00050
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1976.78.3.02a00050 [Google Scholar]
  20. Heath, Shirley Brice
    (1989) Language ideology. InInternational Encyclopedia of Communications. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 393-395.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (1983) Ways with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Herring, Susan C
    (2001) Gender and power in online communication.Working Paper. Center for Social Informatics. Indiana University. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2022/1024/WP01-05B.html
  23. Hudson, Richard A
    (1996) Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166843
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166843 [Google Scholar]
  24. Humphreys, Sal
    (2008) Ruling the world: Governing in massively multiplayer online games. European Journal of Cultural Studies11.2: 149-171. doi: 10.1177/1367549407088329
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407088329 [Google Scholar]
  25. Irvine, Judith
    (2004) Say when: Temporalities in language ideology. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology14.1: 99-109. doi: 10.1525/jlin.2004.14.1.99
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.1.99 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ito, Mizuko , Sonja Baumer , Matteo Bittanti , and danah boyd , et al
    (2010) Hanging Out, Messing Around, Geeking Out: Living and Learning with New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jacoby, Sally , and Patrick Gonzales
    (1991) The constitution of expert-novice in scientific discourse. Issues in Applied Linguistics2.2: 149-181.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jenkins, Henry
    (2009) What happened before YouTube. In J. Burgess , and J. Green (eds.), YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 109-125.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jenkins, Henry , Katie Clinton , Ravi Purushotma , Alice J. Robison , and Margaret Weigel
    (2006) Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Chicago: The MacArthur Foundation. digitallearning.macfound.org/atf/cf/%7B7E45C7E0-A3E0-4B89-AC9C-E807E1B0AE4E%7D/JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lange, Patricia G
    (2011) Learning real life lessons from online games. Games and Culture6.1: 17-37. doi: 10.1177/1555412010377320
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412010377320 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2007) Commenting on comments: Investigating responses to antagonism on YouTube”presented atthe Society for Applied Anthropology Conference , March 31, 2007. sfaapodcasts.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/update-apr-17-lange-sfaa-paper-2007.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2006) Covert mentoring on the Internet: Methods for confirming status in imagined technical communities. Anthropology of Work Review26.2: 21-24. doi: 10.1525/awr.2005.26.2.21
    https://doi.org/10.1525/awr.2005.26.2.21 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2003) Virtual Trouble: Negotiating Access in Online Communities. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Michigan.
  34. Mahiri, Jabari
    (2004) New literacies in a new centuryIn J. Mahiri (ed.), What They Don’t Learn in School: Literacy in the Lives of Urban Youth. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 1-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mandel, Thomas , and Gerard Van der Leun
    (1996) Rules of the Net: On-Line Operating Instructions for Human Beings. New York: Hyperion.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Marsden, Rhodri
    (2009) Is the Internet making us communicate better or worse?The IndependentSeptember2 2009 <www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/rhodri-marsden-is-the-internet-making-us-communicate-better-ndash-or-worse-1780171.html
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Maynard, Douglas W
    (1985) How children start arguments. Language in Society14: 1-30. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500010915
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500010915 [Google Scholar]
  38. McDermott, R.P. , and Henry Tylbor
    (1995) On the necessity of collusion in conversation. In D. Tedlock , and B. Mannheim (eds.), The Dialogic Emergence of Culture. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, pp. 218-237.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Messick, Brinkley
    (1992) The Calligraphic State: Textual Domination and History in a Muslim Society. Berkeley: University of California Press. doi: 10.1525/california/9780520076051.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520076051.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Montgomery, Martin
    (1986) An Introduction to Language and Society. London: Methuen. doi: 10.4324/9780203312032
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203312032 [Google Scholar]
  41. Mortensen, Torill Elvira
    (2006) Wow is the new MUD: Social gaming from text to video. Games and Culture1.4: 397-413. doi: 10.1177/1555412006292622
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412006292622 [Google Scholar]
  42. Noy, Chaim
    (2008) Writing ideology: Hybrid symbols in a commemorative visitor book in Israel. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology18.1: 62-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1548‑1395.2008.00004.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2008.00004.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Olivo, Warren
    (2001) Phat lines: Spelling conventions in rap music. Written Language & Literacy4.1: 67-85. doi: 10.1075/wll.4.1.05oli
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.4.1.05oli [Google Scholar]
  44. Raymond, Eric S
    (1996) The New Hacker’s Dictionary. Third Edition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Rose, Donald
    (1994) Minding Your Cyber-Manners on the Internet. Indianapolis: Alpha Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Ross, Nigel
    (2006) Writing in the information age. English Today8722.3: 39-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Schieffelin, Bambi B. , and Rachelle Charlier Doucet
    (1998) The real Haitian creole: Ideology, metalinguistics and orthographic choice. In B.B. Schieffelin , K.A. Woolard , and P.V. Korskrity (eds.), Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.285-316.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Schocker, Laura
    (2009) Why do CAPITAL LETTERS so annoy us?BBC News Magazine. September3 2009 <news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8234637.stm
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Shantz, Carolyn Uhlinger
    (1987) Conflicts between children. Child Development58: 283-305. doi: 10.2307/1130507
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1130507 [Google Scholar]
  50. Shea, Virginia
    (1994) Netiquette. San Francisco: Albion Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Silverstein, Michael
    (2000) Whorfianism and the linguistic imagination of nationality. In P. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of Language. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, pp. 85-138.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Street, Brian V
    (1984) Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Swisher, Kara
    (1998) aol.com. New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Tagliamonte, Sali A. , and Derek Denis
    (2008) Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech83.1: 3-34. doi: 10.1215/00031283‑2008‑001
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2008-001 [Google Scholar]
  55. Taylor, T.L
    (2006) Does WoW change everything?: How a PvP server, multinational player base, and surveillance mod scene caused me pause. Games and Culture1.4: 318-337. doi: 10.1177/1555412006292615
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412006292615 [Google Scholar]
  56. Thurlow, Crispin
    (2003) Generation Txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online1.1 faculty.washington.edu/thurlow/papers/Thurlow(2003)-DAOL.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Urban Dictionary (N.d.b) Street leet
  58. Urban Dictionary (N.d.a) AOL-speak
  59. Woolard, Kathryn A
    (1998) Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In B.B. Schieffelin , K.A. Woolard , and P.V. Kroskrity (eds.), Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-47.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error