1887
image of When personal names are mentioned in conversations
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Sacks and Schegloff (1979; Schegloff 1996) identify a preference for recognitional references to persons over non-recognitional forms of references. Furthermore, they identify as a subsidiary preference that, among recognitional forms, personal names are preferred over recognitional descriptors. However, as Sacks and Schegloff indicate, these preferences in no way limit the use of names to conclusively recognizable persons, nor do they even inhibit references to persons by name when recognition is not at all practicable. In this report, we first describe those practices that manage (and thereby exhibit) levels of confidence regarding the recognizability of personal names. We then examine several environments in which personal names are employed in introducing persons as previously unknown to recipients, and we describe one family of practices for doing so. Finally, we identify storytelling as a principal environment in which personal names are used, and we describe where unknown persons are introduced by storytellers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.25001.whi
2026-01-27
2026-02-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Clayman, Steven E.
    2013 “Agency in Response: The Role of Prefatory Address Terms.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Dingemanse, Mark, Giovanni Rossi, and Simeon Floyd
    2017 “Place Reference in Story Beginnings: A Cross-linguistic Study of Narrative and Interactional Affordances.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404516001019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404516001019 [Google Scholar]
  3. Downing, Pamela A.
    1996 “Proper Names as a Referential Option in English Conversation.” InStudies in Anaphora, edited byBarbara Fox, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.33.05dow
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.33.05dow [Google Scholar]
  4. Ekberg, Stuart
    2014 “Maintaining Shared Knowledge of Acquaintance: Methods People Use to Establish Who Knows Whom.” British Journal of Social Psychology (): –. 10.1111/bjso.12050
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12050 [Google Scholar]
  5. Goodwin, Charles
    1984 “Notes on Story Structure and the Organization of Participation.” InStructures of Social Action, edited byJ. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Heritage, John
    2007 “Intersubjectivity and Progressivity in Person (and Place) Reference.” InPerson Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, edited byN. J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486746.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486746.012 [Google Scholar]
  7. Holt, Elizabeth
    1996 “Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2 [Google Scholar]
  8. Jackson, Clare
    2013 “‘Why Do These People’s Opinions Matter?’ Positioning Known Referents as Unnameable Others.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445613480587
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613480587 [Google Scholar]
  9. Jefferson, Gail
    1974 “Error Correction as an Interactional Resource.” Language in Society: –. 10.1017/S0047404500004334
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004334 [Google Scholar]
  10. 1978 “Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation.” InStudies in the Organization of Coversational Interaction, edited byJim Schenkein, –. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited byGene H. Lerner, –. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  12. Kitzinger, Celia
    2005 ““Speaking as a Heterosexual”: (How) Does Sexuality Matter for Talk-in-Interaction?” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3803_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3803_2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kushida, Shuya
    2015 “Using Names for referring Without Claiming Shared Knowledge: Name-Quoting Descriptors in Japanese.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351813.2015.1025508
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1025508 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lerner, Gene H.
    1992 “Assisted Storytelling: Deploying Shared Knowledge as a Practical Matter.” Qualitative Sociology (): –. 10.1007/BF00990328
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990328 [Google Scholar]
  15. 1996 “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: ‘Second Person’ Reference in Multi-Party Conversation.” Pragmatics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2003 “Selecting Next Speaker: The Context-Sensitive Operation of a Context-Free Organization.” Language in Society: –. 10.1017/S004740450332202X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450332202X [Google Scholar]
  17. 2019 “When Someone Other Than the Addressed Recipient Speaks Next: Three Kinds of Intervening Action After the Selection of Next Speaker.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351813.2019.1657280
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1657280 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lerner, Gene H., Galina B. Bolden, Alexa Hepburn, and Jenny Mandelbaum
    2012 “Reference Recalibration Repairs: Adjusting the Precision of Formulations for the Task at Hand.” Research on Language & Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351813.2012.674190
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.674190 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lerner, Gene H., and Celia Kitzinger
    2007 “Extraction and Aggregation in the Repair of Individual and Collective Self-Reference.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445607079165
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607079165 [Google Scholar]
  20. Mandelbaum, Jenny
    1989 “Interpersonal Activities in Conversational Storytelling.” Western Journal of Speech (): –. 10.1080/10570318909374295
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318909374295 [Google Scholar]
  21. Oh, Sun-Young
    2007 “Interactional Functions of English Demonstratives in Personal Reference.” English Language and Linguistics: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pillet-Shore, Danielle
    2011 “Doing Introductions: The Work Involved in Meeting Someone New.” Communication Monographs (): –. 10.1080/03637751.2010.542767
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2010.542767 [Google Scholar]
  23. Raymond, Chase Wesley, and Virginia Teas Gill
    2025 “Pre-emptive Repair of Potential Misunderstandings: Prospective Procedures for Managing Intersubjectivity and Steering Social Action.” American Sociological Review (): –. 10.1177/00031224251347285
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224251347285 [Google Scholar]
  24. Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage
    2006 “The Epistemics of Social Relations: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404506060325
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325 [Google Scholar]
  25. Sacks, Harvey
    1974 “An Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in Conversation.” InExplorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, edited byRichard Bauman, and Joel Sherzer, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1979 “Hotrodder: A Revolutionary Category.” InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, edited byGeorge Psathas, –. New York: Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1986 “Some Considerations of a Story Told in Everyday Conversation.” Poetics: –. 10.1016/0304‑422X(86)90036‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(86)90036-7 [Google Scholar]
  28. 1992Lectures on Conversation. vols. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
    1979 “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and their Interaction.” InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, edited byGeorge Psathas, –. New York: Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1972 “Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place.” InStudies in Social Interaction, edited byDavid N. Sudnow, –. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 1992 “Introduction.” InLectures on Conversation, edited byGail Jefferson, –. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 1996 “Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-Interaction: A Partial Sketch of a Systematics.” InStudies in Anaphora, edited byBarbara Fox, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.33.14sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.33.14sch [Google Scholar]
  33. 2009 “One Perspective on Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives.” InConversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, edited byJack Sidnell, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511635670.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635670.013 [Google Scholar]
  34. Stivers, Tanya
    2007 “Alternative Recognitionals in Person Reference.” InPerson Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, edited byN. J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486746.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486746.005 [Google Scholar]
  35. Svennevig, Jan
    2010 “Pre-empting Reference Problems in Conversation.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404510000060
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000060 [Google Scholar]
  36. Tennent, Emma, and Ann Weatherall
    2024 “Person Reference and a Preference for Association in Emergency Calls.” Research on Language and Social Interaction (): –. 10.1080/08351813.2024.2340410
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2024.2340410 [Google Scholar]
  37. Whitehead, Kevin A., and Gene H. Lerner
    2009 “When Are Persons ‘White’? On Some Practical Asymmetries of Racial Reference in Talk-in-Interaction.” Discourse and Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926509106413
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509106413 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2020 “Referring to Somebody: Generic Person Reference as an Interactional Resource.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.011 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2022 “When Simple Self-Reference Is Too Simple: Managing the Categorical Relevance of Speaker Self-Presentation.” Language in Society: –. 10.1017/S0047404521000270
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404521000270 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.25001.whi
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error