A systematic review of reliability in corpus-based metadiscourse studies

References

1. Ahmed, Abdelhamid M., and Xiao Zhang
   2023 “Students’ Voice in L2 English Writing: A Systematic Review of Literature.” Ampersand. 10.1016/j.amper.2023.100114
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2023.100114 [Google Scholar]
2. Belur, Jyoti, Lisa Tompson, Amy Thornton, and Miranda Simon
   2021 “Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making.” Sociological Methods & Research (): –. 10.1177/0049124118799372
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799372 [Google Scholar]
3. Bouziri, Basma
   2019 “A Corpus-Assisted Genre Analysis of the Tunisian Lecture Corpus: Focus on Metadiscourse.” PhD dissertation. Université Catholique de Louvain.
4. Bouziri, Basma
   2020 “Topic Signaling Metadiscourse Devices in the Tunisian Lecture Corpus.” ESP Today (): –. 10.18485/esptoday.2020.8.2.3
   https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2020.8.2.3 [Google Scholar]
5. Bouziri, Basma
   2021 “A Tripartite Interpersonal Model for Investigating Metadiscourse in Academic Lectures.” Applied Linguistics (): –. WOS:000727808600008. 10.1093/applin/amab001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab001 [Google Scholar]
6. Callies, Marcus
   2015 “Learner Corpus Methodology.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, edited bySylviane Granger, Gaetanelle Gilquin, and Fanny Meunier, –. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139649414.003
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414.003 [Google Scholar]
7. Chong, Sin Wang, and Luke Plonsky
   2023 “A Typology of Secondary Research in Applied Linguistics.” Applied Linguistics Review (): –. 10.1515/applirev‑2022‑0189
   https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0189 [Google Scholar]
8. Chong, Sin Wang, and Luke Plonsky
   2024 “Research Synthesis in Language Education.” InReference Module in Social Sciences. Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑323‑95504‑1.00010‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95504-1.00010-7 [Google Scholar]
9. Crismore, Avon, Raija Markkanen, and Margaret S. Steffensen
   1993 “Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing: A Study of Texts Written by American and Finnish University Students.” Written Communication (): –. 10.1177/0741088393010001002
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002 [Google Scholar]
10. Feng, Guangchao Charles
    2015 “Mistakes and How to Avoid Mistakes in Using Intercoder Reliability Indices.” Methodology (): –. 10.1027/1614‑2241/a000086
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000086 [Google Scholar]
11. Freelon, Deen
    2010 “ReCal: Intercoder Reliability Calculation as a Web Service.” International Journal of Internet Science (): –. dfreelon.org/utils/recalfront/recal2/
    [Google Scholar]
12. Grisot, Cristina
    2017 “A Quantitative Approach to Conceptual, Procedural and Pragmatic Meaning: Evidence from Inter-Annotator Agreement.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.06.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.06.020 [Google Scholar]
13. Hober, Nicole, Tülay Dixon, and Tove Larsson
    2023 “Towards Increased Reliability and Transparency in Projects with Manual Linguistic Coding.” Corpora (): –. 10.3366/cor.2023.0284
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2023.0284 [Google Scholar]
14. Hovy, E., and Julia Lavid
    2010 “Towards a ‘Science’ of Corpus Annotation: A New Methodological Challenge for Corpus Linguistics.” International Journal of Translation ().
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hunston, Susan
    1999 “Evaluation and the Planes of Discourse: Status and Value in Persuasive Texts.” InEvaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, edited byGeoff Thompson, and Susan Hunston, –. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hyland, Ken
    2005 Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Continuum Discourse Series.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Landis, J. Richard, and Gary G. Koch
    1977 “An Application of Hierarchical Kappa-type Statistics in the Assessment of Majority Agreement among Multiple Observers.” Biometrics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Larsson, Tove, Magali Paquot, and Luke Plonsky
    2020 “Inter-Rater Reliability in Learner Corpus Research: Insights from a Collaborative Study on Adverb Placement.” International Journal of Learner Corpus Research (): –. 10.1075/ijlcr.20001.lar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.20001.lar [Google Scholar]
19. Liu, Yanhua, and Guangwei Hu
    2021 “Mapping the Field of English for Specific Purposes (1980–2018): A Co-Citation Analysis.” English for Specific Purposes: –. 10.1016/j.esp.2020.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.10.003 [Google Scholar]
20. Norouzian, Reza
    2021 “Interrater Reliability in Second Language Meta-Analyses: The Case of Categorical Moderators.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition (): –. 10.1017/S0272263121000061
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000061 [Google Scholar]
21. Paltridge, Brian, and Aek Phakiti
    eds. 2015 Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Resource. Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Pearson, William S., and Esmaeel Abdollahzadeh
    2023 “Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Systematic Review.” Lingua. 10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103561
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103561 [Google Scholar]
23. Perez Aguilar, Marta, and Elisabeth Macia Arno
    2002 “Metadiscourse in Lecture Comprehension: Does It Really Help Foreign Language Learners?” Atlantis (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Plonsky, Luke, and Frederick Oswald
    2015 “Meta-Analyzing Second Language Research.” InMethodological Synthesis in Quantitative L2 Research: A Review of Reviews and a Case Study of Exploratory Factor Analysis. Routledge, –. 10.4324/9781315870908‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870908-6 [Google Scholar]
25. Plonsky, Luke, and Deirdre J. Derrick
    2016 “A Meta-Analysis of Reliability Coefficients in Second Language Research.” The Modern Language Journal (): –. 10.1111/modl.12335
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12335 [Google Scholar]
26. Rodwell, Mary K.
    1998 Social Work Constructivist Research. Garland Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Schröter, Thorsten, and Agnieszka Jablonska Eklöf
    2020 “Assessment in English for Young Learners in Sweden: Guidelines, Challenges and Coping Strategies.” Educare (): –. 10.24834/educare.2020.3.1
    https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2020.3.1 [Google Scholar]
28. Spooren, Wilbert, and Liesbeth Degand
    2010 “Coding Coherence Relations: Reliability and Validity.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory (): –. 10.1515/cllt.2010.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2010.009 [Google Scholar]
29. Swales, John M.
    2019 “The Futures of EAP Genre Studies: A Personal Viewpoint.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes (): –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.003 [Google Scholar]
30. Wood, Margaret, Tove Larsson, Luke Plonsky, Scott Sterling, Merja Kytö, and Katherine Yaw
    2024 Addressing Questionable Research Practices in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Applied Linguistics Press.
    [Google Scholar]