Volume 26, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


Newspaper editorials are shaped by the need to negotiate alignment and rapport with a diverse readership. This is achieved partly through the resources of engagement (Martin and White 2005), that is, through the argumentative moves of disclaim, proclaim, entertain and attribute, by which dialogic relations with the reader are carefully modulated. One aspect of argumentation in editorials that has sometimes been overlooked is that of the concede-counter structure, by which the writer signals concurrence with the reader on a particular issue, only to counter this with a new argument that may wholly or partially refute the first one. Typically, leader writers signal this manoeuvre textually from the outset, indicating that they are setting up an argument in order to demolish it by means of specific lexical choices or patterns. Thus items such as “of course” or “naturally” are used to build up the first argument, with which the reader is understood to concur. This is generally followed by a turning point marked by “but”, “yet” or “though”, after which the counter-argument is presented. Corpus linguists have pointed out that the presence of this type of lexical patterning makes it possible to research argumentation in large volumes of text using corpus tools. This study contains an analysis of concede-counter patterns in a corpus consisting of all the editorials published in the newspaper in 2011. The distinctive patterns that emerge are described, with particular attention paid to patterns of alignment and disalignment that emerge, as well as the related use of concurrence in asides to the reader. The role of such patterns in structuring discourse is analysed, with a particular focus on their ideological dimension as a means of subtly aligning readers with a particular set of opinions.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Achugar, Mariana
    (2004) The events and actors of 11 September 2001 as seen from Uruguay: Analysis of daily newspaper editorials. Discourse and Society15.2-3: 291-320. doi: 10.1177/0957926504041021
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041021 [Google Scholar]
  2. Amossy, Ruth
    (2009) The New Rhetoric’s inheritance. Argumentation and discourse analysis. Argumentation23: 313-324. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑009‑9154‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-009-9154-y [Google Scholar]
  3. Ansary, Hasan , and Esmat Babaii
    (2005) The generic integrity of newspaper editorials: A systemic functional approach. RELC Journal36.3: 271-295. doi: 10.1177/0033688205060051
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688205060051 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakhtin, Mikhail
    (1978) Discourse typology in prose. In Ladislay Matejka , and Krystyna Pomorska (eds.), Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp.176-196.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolívar, Adriana
    (1994) The structure of newspaper editorials. In Malcom Coulthard (ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis. London and New York: Routledge, pp.276-294.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre
    (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511812507
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dafouz, Emma
    (2008) The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal discourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics40: 95-113. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies, Matt
    (2013) Oppositions and ideology in news discourse. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Diani, Giuliana
    (2008) Emphasizers in spoken and written academic discourse. The case of really. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics13.3: 296-321. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.13.3.04dia
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.3.04dia [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoey, Michael
    (2005) Lexical priming. A new theory of words and language. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hunston, Susan
    (2001) Colligation, lexis, pattern and text. In Geoffrey Thompson , and Mike Scott (eds.), Patterns of text: In honour of Michael Hoey. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.13-33. doi: 10.1075/z.107.03hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.107.03hun [Google Scholar]
  12. Kuhi, Davud , and Manijheh Mojood
    (2014) Metadiscourse in newspaper genre: A cross-linguistic study of English and Persian newspaper editorials. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences98: 1046–1055. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.515
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.515 [Google Scholar]
  13. Le, Elisabeth
    (2004) Active participation within written argumentation: Metadiscourse and editorialist’s authority. Journal of Pragmatics36: 687-714. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00032‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00032-8 [Google Scholar]
  14. Mann, William C. , and Maite Taboada
    (2010) RST Website. Http://www.sfu.ca/rst
  15. Martin, James R. , and Peter R.R. White
    (2005) The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  16. Morley, John
    (2006) Lexical cohesion and rhetorical structure. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics11.3: 265-282. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.11.3.03mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.11.3.03mor [Google Scholar]
  17. Perelman, Chaim , and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
    (1969) The New Rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie , and Karin Aijmer
    (2007) The semantic field of modal certainty: A corpus based study of English adverbs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110198928
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198928 [Google Scholar]
  19. Taboada, Maite , and Maria de los Angeles Gómez-González
    (2012) Discourse markers and coherence relations: Comparison across markers, languages and modalities. Linguistics and the Human Sciences6: 17-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Dijk, Teun A
    (1995) Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & Society6.2: 243-289. doi: 10.1177/0957926595006002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002006 [Google Scholar]
  21. (1996) Opinions and ideologies in editorials. Fourth International Symposium of Critical Discourse Analysis.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Verschueren, Jef
    (2012) Ideology in Language Use: Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error