1887
Volume 26, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

This study deals with the use of expository questions as discourse strategy in (4 c. B.C.), a foundational text of Daoism. We treat this particular type of non-information-seeking questions (e.g. “ Because…”) as a manifestation of conversational monologues, which are themselves fictive kinds of interactions between the original writer and subsequent reader(s) (Pascual 2002, 2014). We further analyze expository questions as constructions of intersubjectivity (cf. Verhagen 2005, 2008), involving a viewpoint blend (Dancygier and Sweetser 2012), integrating the perspectives of the writer, the assumed readers and the discourse characters. We hope to show that–counter to what is commonly assumed in discourse studies–conversationalization is not restricted to modern institutional discourse (Fairclough 1994) or spoken informal speech (Streeck 2002).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.26.1.07xia
2016-03-01
2019-11-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakhtin, Mikhail M
    ([1975] 1981) The dialogic imagination. M. Holquist (ed.), Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ([1979] 1986) Speech genres and other late essays. C. Emerson and M. Holquist (eds.), Vern W. McGee (trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Badarneh, Muhammad A
    (2003)  The rhetorical question as a discursive and stylistic device in the Quran . Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergen, Benjamin
    (2005) Mental simulation in literal and figurative language understanding. In S. Coulson , and B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.), The literal and nonliteral in language and thought. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp.255-278.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2012) Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergen, Benjamin , and Nancy Chang
    (2005) Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In J.-O. Östman , and M. Fried (eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.147-190. doi: 10.1075/cal.3.08ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3.08ber [Google Scholar]
  7. Bisang, Walter
    (2008) Underspecification and the noun/verb distinction: Late archaic Chinese and Khmer. In A. Steube (ed.), The discourse potential of underspecified structures. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.55-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2013) Word-class systems between flexibility and rigidity: An integrative approach. In J. Rijkhoff , and E. van Lier (eds.), Flexible word classes: A typological study of underspecified parts of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.275-302. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blondell, Ruby
    (2002) The play of character in Plato's Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511482472
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482472 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bowery, Anne-Marie
    (2007) Know thyself: Socrates as storyteller. In G.A. Scott (ed.), Philosophy in dialogue: Plato’s many devices. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp.82-110.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Brandt, Line
    (2008) A semiotic approach to fictive interaction as a representational strategy in communicative meaning construction. In T. Oakley , and A. Hougaard (eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.109-148. doi: 10.1075/pbns.170.05bra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.170.05bra [Google Scholar]
  12. (2013) The communicative mind: A linguistic exploration of conceptual integration and meaning construction. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Brunye, Tad T. , Tali Ditman , Caroline R. Mahoney , Holly A. Taylor , and Jason S. Augustyn
    (2009) When you and I share perspectives: Pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science20.1: 27-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02249.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02249.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Chaemsaithong, Krisda
    (2013) Interaction in early modern news discourse: The case of English witchcraft pamphlets and their prefaces (1566–1621). Text & Talk33.2: 167-188.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (forthcoming) Persuading and arguing with the reader: Fictive interaction as discourse organizing device in witchcraft pamphlet prefaces 1566-1621). In E. Pascual , and S. Sandler (eds.) The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chang, Suk-Jin
    (1982) Non-standard questions: polarity and contrast. Language Research18: 157-170.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, Guying
    (2007) Zhuangzi jinshi jinyi zuixin xiuding ban [Modern commentaries and translations of Zhuangzi] (newly revised edition). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chuska, Kenneth R
    (1995) Improving classroom questions: A teacher’s guide to increasing student motivation, participation and higher-level thinking. Bloomington, IN: Phi Beta Kappan Educational Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Clark, Herbert H
    (1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  20. Clark, Herbert H. , and Richard J. Gerrig
    (1990) Quotations as demonstrations. Language66.4: 764-805. doi: 10.2307/414729
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
  21. Combs, Steven C
    (2005) The Dao of rhetoric. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Cooren, François
    (2010) Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation and ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/ds.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2012) Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication62.1: 1-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2011.01622.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01622.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Dancygier, Barbara
    (2012) The language of stories: A cognitive approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dancygier, Barbara , and Eve Sweetser
    (eds.) (2012) Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139084727
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084727 [Google Scholar]
  26. Du Bois , John W
    (2014) Towards a dialogic syntax. In R. Giora , and J.W. Du Bois (Guest eds.), Special issue, ‘Dialogic resonance: Activating affinities across utterances’. Cognitive Linguistics25.3: 359-410.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fairclough, Norman
    (1994) Conversationalisation of public discourse and the authority of the consumer. In R. Keat , N. Whiteley , and N. Abercrombie (eds.), The authority of the consumer. London: Routledge, pp.253-268.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fauconnier, Gilles
    ([1985] 1994) Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Fauconnier, Gilles , and Mark Turner
    (1994) Conceptual projection and middle spaces. UCSD Cognitive Science Technical Report9401.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (1996) Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language. Stanford: CSLI, pp.113-130.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (1998) Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science2.1: 133-187. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Fung, Yu-lan
    ([1948] 1997) A short history of Chinese philosophy. David Bodde (ed.). New York: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (1964) Chuang-Tsŭ: A new selected translation with an exposition of the philosophy of Kuo Hsiang (2nd edn.). New York: Paragon Book Reprint Corp.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gibbs, Raymond W. , and Teenie Matlock
    (2008) Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In R.W. Gibbs (ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.161-176. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.011 [Google Scholar]
  36. Givón, Talmy
    (1983) Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/tsl.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3 [Google Scholar]
  37. Goffman, Erving
    (1963) Behaviour in public places: Notes on the social organisation of gatherings. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Goldhill, Simon
    (ed.) (2009) The end of dialogue in antiquity. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511575464
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575464 [Google Scholar]
  39. Graham, Angus. C
    ([1979] 1990) How much of Chuang Tzu did Chuang Tzu write?In A.C. Graham (ed.), Studies in Chinese philosophy and philosophical literature. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp.283-321.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Guo, Qingfan
    ([1894] 2013) Zhuangzi jishi [Collected commentaries on Zhuangzi]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Harvard-Yenching Institute
    (1956) Zhuangzi yinde [A concordance to Zhuangzi]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Herman, Vimala
    (1999) Deictic projection and conceptual blending in epistolarity. Poetics Today20.3: 523-541.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Herman, David
    (2002) Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Hogan, Patrick C
    (2013) How authors’ minds make stories. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139540629
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139540629 [Google Scholar]
  45. Huang, Jian
    (2013) Sixiang men: Xianqin zhuzi jiedu zending ben [The gate of ideas: Interpreting pre-Qin philosophers] (updated edn.). Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Ilie, Cornelia
    (1999) Question-response argumentation in talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics31.8: 975-999. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00056‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00056-9 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kearsley, Greg P
    (1976) Questions and question asking in verbal discourse: A cross-disciplinary review. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research5.4: 355-375. doi: 10.1007/BF01079934
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079934 [Google Scholar]
  48. Lakoff, George
    (1996) Sorry, I’m not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualizing the self. In G. Fauconnier , and E. Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, worlds and grammar. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, pp.91-123.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Langacker, Ronald W
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisite. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (1999) Virtual reality. Studies in Linguistic Sciences29.2: 77-103.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2001) Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics12.2: 143-188. doi: 10.1515/cogl.12.2.143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143 [Google Scholar]
  53. (2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2013) Interactive cognition: Toward a unified account of structure, processing, and discourse. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics3.2: 95–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Li, Charles N. , and Sandra A. Thompson
    (1976) Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C.N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, pp.457-489.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Liu, Kaihua
    (2008) Zhonggu hanyu yiwenju yanjiu [A study on interrogatives in middle Chinese]. Harbin: Heilongjiang People’s Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Liu, Xiaogan
    (2015) Textual Issues in the Zhuangzi . In X. Liu (ed.), Dao companion to Daoist philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.129-157.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Lu, Xun
    (1981) Han wenxueshi gangyao [Outline of the history of Chinese literature]. Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Mair, Victor H
    (2000) The Zhuangzi and its impact. In L. Kohn (ed.), Daoism handbook. Boston: Brill, pp.30-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Mead, George H
    ([1934] 1955) Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Miller, Cynthia L
    (1996) The representation of speech in biblical Hebrew narrative: A linguistic analysis. Atlanta: Scholars Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Oakley, Todd , and Vera Tobin
    (2014) The whole is sometimes less than the sum of its parts: Toward a theory of document acts. Language and Cognition6.1: 79-110. doi: 10.1017/langcog.2013.6
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2013.6 [Google Scholar]
  63. Ong, Walter J
    ([1982] 2002) Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London/New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203328064
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203328064 [Google Scholar]
  64. Pagán Cánovas, Cristóbal , and Mark Turner
    (forthcoming) Generic integration templates for fictive communication. In E. Pascual , and S. Sandler (eds.) The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Pascual, Esther
    (2002) Imaginary trialogues: Conceptual blending and fictive interaction in criminal courts. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. (2006a) Fictive interaction within the sentence: A communicative type of fictivity in grammar. Cognitive Linguistics17.2: 245-267. doi: 10.1515/COG.2006.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.006 [Google Scholar]
  67. (2006b) Questions in legal monologues: Fictive interaction as argumentative strategy in a murder trial. Text & Talk26.3: 383-402. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2006.014a
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.014a [Google Scholar]
  68. (2008a) Text for context, trial for trialogue: A fieldwork study of a fictive interaction blend. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics6: 50-82. doi: 10.1075/arcl.6.04pas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.6.04pas [Google Scholar]
  69. (2008b) Fictive interaction blends in everyday life and courtroom settings. In T. Oakley , and A. Hougaard (eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.79-107. doi: 10.1075/pbns.170.04pas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.170.04pas [Google Scholar]
  70. (2014) Fictive interaction: The conversation frame in thought, language, and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/hcp.47
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.47 [Google Scholar]
  71. Pascual, Esther , and Sergeiy Sandler
    (eds.) (forthcoming) The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Piaget, Jean
    ([1959] 2005) Jean Piaget: Selected works, vol. 5: The language and thought of the child (3rd edn.). London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Pulleyblank, Edwin G
    (1995) Outline of classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Recanati, François
    (1995) Le présent épistolaire: Une perspective cognitive. L’information Grammaticale66: 38-44. doi: 10.3406/igram.1995.3046
    https://doi.org/10.3406/igram.1995.3046 [Google Scholar]
  75. Roth, Harold
    (2008) Zhuangzi. In E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. [plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/zhuangzi/].
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Sankoff, Gillian , and Penelope Brown
    (1976) The origins of syntax in discourse: A case study of Tok Pisin relatives. Language52: 631-666. doi: 10.2307/412723
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412723 [Google Scholar]
  77. Sarles, Harvey B
    (1977) Language and human nature. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Schegloff, Emanuel A. , and Harvey Sacks
    (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica7: 289–327. doi: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  79. Seuren, Pieter A.M
    (2010) Language from within, vol. 2: The logic of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Stanfield, Robert A. , and Rolf A. Zwaan
    (2001) The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science12.2: 153-156. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9280.00326
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00326 [Google Scholar]
  81. Streeck, Jürgen
    (2002) Grammars, words, and embodied meanings. Journal of Communication52.3: 581-596. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2002.tb02563.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02563.x [Google Scholar]
  82. Talmy, Leonard
    ([1996] 2000) Fictive motion in language and ‘ception.’InToward a cognitive semantics: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp.99-175.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Tobin, Vera
    (2014) Readers as overhearers and texts as objects: Joint attention in reading communities. Scripta18.34: 179-198. doi: 10.5752/P.2358‑3428.2014v18n34p179
    https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2358-3428.2014v18n34p179 [Google Scholar]
  84. Turner, Mark
    (2010) Ten lectures on mind and language by Mark Turner. F. Li, Y. Ding , and Y. Gao (eds.). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Verhagen, Arie
    (2005) Construction of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. (2008) Intersubjectivity and the architecture of the language system. In J. Zlatev , R. Timothy , C. Sinha , and E. Itkonen (eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.307-331. doi: 10.1075/celcr.12.17ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12.17ver [Google Scholar]
  87. Vis, Kirsten
    (2011)  Subjectivity in news discourse: A corpus linguistic analysis of informalization . Ph.D. Dissertation, VU Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Vis, Kirsten , José Sanders , and Wilbert Spooren
    (2012) Diachronic changes in subjectivity and stance - A corpus linguistic study of Dutch news texts. Discourse, Context and Media1: 95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2012.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2012.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  89. Wang, Bo
    (2013) The philosophy of Chuang Tzu (2nd ed.). Beijing: Peking University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Wang, Rongpei
    (trans.) (1999) Zhuangzi. Changsha: Hunan People's Publishing House and Beijing: Foreign Language Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Watson, Burton
    ([1968] 2013) The complete works of Zhuangzi. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Xiang, Mingjian
    (forthcoming) Real, imaginary or fictive? Philosophical dialogues in the pictorial version of an early Daoist text. In E. Pascual , and S. Sandler (eds.) The conversation frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Yang, Bojun , and He Leshi
    (2001) Guhanyu yufa ji qi fazhan [A grammar of ancient Chinese and its development] (revised edn.). Beijing: Language & Culture Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Ye, Chengyi
    ([1979] 2004) Zhuangzi yuyan yanjiu [A study on fables in Zhuangzi]. Taipei: Wenshizhe Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Yi, Mengchun
    (2005) Xianqin hanyu yufa [Grammar of pre-Qin classical Chinese]. Changsha: Hunan Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhang, Mosheng
    ([1948] 2007) Zhuangzi xinshi [A new interpretation of Zhuangzi]. Beijing: New World Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Zlatev, Jordan , Timothy P. Racine , Chris Sinha , and Esa Itkonen
    (eds.) (2008) The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/celcr.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.26.1.07xia
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error