Volume 26, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


Studies in CDA have revealed the nature of the marketized language that now infuses universities and other public institutions, but there is no comprehensive study as to how this language enters the everyday practices of the university through different levels of steering documents and meetings. In this paper, taking one example from a corpus of data from a larger project on New Public Management in Sweden, we show how successively more detailed documents are created by professional administrators in order to present vision statements, that are first operationalized into strategies and then into more concrete ‘activities’ for the subject level that are related to bundles of performance indicators. These documents re-contextualize practices of teaching and research in line with marketized goals, yet do so through consistent lack of clear agency, causality and process. A number of linguistic and multimodal resources are deployed in a chain of interrelated documents legitimizing this process as one made by careful, technical, management expertise, although the result is a fragmentation of the actual interconnected processes that comprise university work.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Parding, K. , L. Abrahamsson , and A. Jansson
    (2012) New conditions for identities, cultures and governance of welfare sector professionals: The teaching profession. Ephemera12.3: 294–308.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvesson, M
    (2013) The Triumph of Emptiness: Consumption, Higher Education, and Work Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersson, T. , and S. Tengblad
    (2009) When complexity meets culture: New public management and the Swedish police. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management6.1/2: 41–56. doi: 10.1108/11766090910940656
    https://doi.org/10.1108/11766090910940656 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ball, S.J
    (2004) Education for sale! The commodification of everything? King´s Annual Education Lecture. University of London, June 2014, 2004 sys.glotta.ntua.gr/Dialogos/Politics/CERU0410-253-OWI.pdf (accessedJanuary 27, 2014).
  5. Bergström, O. , and D. Knights
    (2006) Organizational discourse and subjectivity. Subjectification during processes of recruitment. Human Relations59.3: 351–377. doi: 10.1177/0018726706064179
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706064179 [Google Scholar]
  6. Caldas-Coulthard, C.R. , and M. Coulthard
    (1996) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical, Discourse. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chiapello E. , and N. Fairclough
    (2002) Understanding the new management ideology: A transdisciplinary contribution from critical discourse analysis and the new sociology of capitalism. Discourse & Society13/2: 185–208. doi: 10.1177/0957926502013002406
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013002406 [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies, B. , and P. Bansel
    (2007) Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education20/3: 247–259. doi: 10.1080/09518390701281751
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390701281751 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ek, A.-C. , M. Ideland , S. Jönsson , and C. Malmberg
    (2013) The tension between marketisation and academisation in higher education. Studies in Higher Education38.9: 1305–1318. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.619656
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.619656 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fairclough, N
    (1993) Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society4.2: 133–168. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Foucault, M
    (1977) Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon Books
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hall, P
    (2012) Managementbyråkrati - organisationspolitisk makt i svensk offentlig förvaltning. Malmö: Liber.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliday, M.A.K
    (1987) Language as Social Semiotic. London: Hodder.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hedegaard, J. , and H. Ahl
    (2013) The gender subtext of new public management-based work practices in Swedish health care. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion32.2: 144–156. doi: 10.1108/02610151311324389
    https://doi.org/10.1108/02610151311324389 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hellberg, S
    (1998) Konflikter i grundskolans kursplaner för svenska. Språk och stil18: 5–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hodge, B. , and G. Kress
    (1988) Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Holborow, M
    (2013) Applied linguistics in the neoliberal university: Ideological keywords and social agency. Applied Linguistics Review4.2: 229–257. doi: 10.1515/applirev‑2013‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0011 [Google Scholar]
  19. Iedema, R
    (2003).Discourses of Post-Bureaucratic Organization. Document Design Companion Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/ddcs.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ddcs.5 [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnson, M
    (1987) The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kärreman, D. , and M. Alvesson
    (2004) Cages in tandem: Management control, social identity, and identification in a knowledge-intensive firm. Organization11.1: 149–175. doi: 10.1177/1350508404039662
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404039662 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kress, G. , and T. van Leeuwen
    (2006) Reading Images: A Grammar Visual Design. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Machin, D
    (2004) Building the world’s visual language: The increasing global importance of image banks in corporate media. Visual Communication3.3: 316–336. doi: 10.1177/1470357204045785
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357204045785 [Google Scholar]
  24. Machin, D. , and A. Mayr
    (2012) How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis. A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mautner, G
    (2005) The entrepreneurial university. A discursive profile of a higher education buzzword. Critical Discourse Studies2.2: 95–120. doi: 10.1080/17405900500283540
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900500283540 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2014) The privatisation of the public realm: A critical perspective on practice and discourse. InContemporary Critical Discourse Studies, Hrsg. C. Hart and P. Cap . London etc.: Bloomsbury Continuum, pp.463–479.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Morrish, L , and H. Sauntson
    (2010) Vision, values and international excellence: The products that the university mission statements sell to students. In M. Molesworth , R. Scullion , and L. Nixon (eds.), The student as a consumer and the marketization of higher education. London: Routledge, pp.73–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Peters, M. , A.C. Besley , M. Olssen , S. Maurere , and S. Weber
    (eds.) (2009) Governmentality Studies in Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Pollitt, C. , and G. Bouchaert
    (2013) Public Management Reform - a Comparative Analysis. New Public Management, Governance, and Neo-Weberian State, 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Power, M
    (1997) The audit society: Rituals of verification. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. van Dijk, T.A
    (1993) Principles of discourse analysis. Discourse & Society4.2: 249–283. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
  32. (1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. van Leeuwen, T
    (1999) The representation of social actors. In C.R. Caldas-Coulthard , and M. Coulthard (eds.), Texts and Practices - Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp.32–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2008) Discourse and Practice. London: Routledge. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  35. van Leeuwen, T. , and R. Wodak
    (1999) Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies1.1: 83–119. doi: 10.1177/1461445699001001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005 [Google Scholar]
  36. Vision
  37. Waring, J
    (2009) Constructing and re-constructing narratives of patient safety. Social Science & Medicine69.12: 1722–31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.052
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.052 [Google Scholar]
  38. Westerberg A.I. , and B. Jacobsson
    (2013) Staten och granskningssamhället. Huddinge: Södertörns högskola.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, J. , and K. O’Halloran
    (2013) Toward a global knowledge enterprise: University websites as portals to the ongoing marketization of higher education. Critical Discourse Studies10/4: 468–485. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2013.813777
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.813777 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error