1887
Volume 27, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

Using audio-recorded data from second language (L2) English conversations-for-learning between an L2 user of English and a first language (L1) user of English (the researcher), this study analyzes cases in which the L1 user avoids initiation of repair. In each case, the L2 user appears to have misunderstood something said by the L1 user. Instead of initiating repair in next turn on the L2 user’s talk, or in third position on his own talk, the L1 user goes along, at least briefly, with the direction set by the L2 user. Often, the L1 user, sooner or later, returns to the misunderstood talk. Avoidance of repair initiation is one way in which the L1 user contributes to the construction of the L2 user as interactionally competent to participate in conversations-for-learning.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.27.2.03hau
2017-06-29
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/prag.27.2.03hau.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/prag.27.2.03hau&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bolden, Galina B.
    2006 “Little Words that Matter: Discourse Markers “so” and “oh” and the Doing of Other-Attentiveness in Social Interaction.” Journal of Communication56: 661–688. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2006.00314.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00314.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Drew, Paul
    1997 “‘Open’ Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Troubles in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics28: 69–101. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)89759‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7 [Google Scholar]
  3. Enfield, N.J.
    2009The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511576737
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576737 [Google Scholar]
  4. Erickson, Frederick
    2004Talk and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferguson, Charles A.
    1975 “Toward a Characterization of English Foreigner Talk.” Anthropological Linguistics17: 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Firth, Alan
    1996 “The Discursive Accomplishment of Normality. On ‘Lingua Franca’ English and Conversation Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics26: 237–259. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(96)00014‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(96)00014-8 [Google Scholar]
  7. Hall, Joan Kelly , John Hellermann , and Simona Pekarek Doehler
    (eds.) 2011L2 Interactional Competence and Development. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hauser, Eric
    2003‘Corrective Recasts’ and Other-Correction of Language Form in Interaction among Native and Non-Native Speakers of English: The Application of Conversation Analysis to Second Language Acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2013a “Stability and Change in One Adult’s Second Language English Negation.” Language Learning63: 463–498. doi: 10.1111/lang.12012
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12012 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2013b “Expanding Resources for Marking Direct Reported Speech.” InPragmatics & Language Learning, Vol.13, ed. by Tim Greer , Donna Tatsuki , and Carsten Roever , 29–53. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaiʻi, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2016 “The Construction of Interactional Incompetence in L2 Interaction.” Paper presented atThe Teaching and Testing of L2 Interactional Competence Symposium, Rice University, Houston, TX.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. He, Agnes Weiyun , and Richard Young
    1998 “Language Proficiency Interviews: A Discourse Approach.” InTalking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency, ed. by Richard Young , and Agnes Weiyun He , 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.14.02he
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.14.02he [Google Scholar]
  13. Heinrich, Patrick
    2012The Making of Monolingual Japan: Language Ideology and Japanese Modernity. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Heritage, John
    1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson , and John Heritage , 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1998 “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society27: 291–334. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500019990
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500019990 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hymes, Dell
    1974Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jefferson, Gail
    1987 “On Exposed and Embedded Correction in Conversation.” InTalk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button , and John R. E. Lee , 86–100. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner , 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson, Karen E.
    1995Understanding Communication in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kinzinger, Celia
    2013 “Repair.” InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell , and Tanya Stivers , 229–256. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Liberman, Ken
    1980 “Ambiguity and Gratuitous Concurrence in Inter-Cultural Communication.” Human Studies3: 65–85. doi: 10.1007/BF02331801
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02331801 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2012 “Semantic Drift in Conversations.” Human Studies35: 263–277. doi: 10.1007/s10746‑012‑9225‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-012-9225-1 [Google Scholar]
  23. Long, Michael H.
    1983 “Native Speaker/Non-Native Speaker Conversation and the Negotiation of Comprehensible Input.” Applied Linguistics4: 126–141. doi: 10.1093/applin/4.2.126
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126 [Google Scholar]
  24. Nguyen, Hanh thi , and Gabriele Kasper
    (eds.) 2009Talk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaiʻi, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Raymond, Geoffrey
    2003 “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review68: 939–967. doi: 10.2307/1519752
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752 [Google Scholar]
  26. Sacks, Harvey
    2004 “An Initial Characterization of the Organization of Speaker Turn-Taking in Conversation.” InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner , 35–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.04sac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.04sac [Google Scholar]
  27. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language50: 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  28. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1972 “Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place.” InStudies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow , 75–119. New York: The Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 1992 “Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology97: 1295–1345. www.jstor.org/stable/2781417
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  31. Schegloff, Emanuel A. , Gail Jefferson , and Harvey Sacks
    1977 “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language53: 361–382. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  32. Stivers, Tanya , and Jeffrey D. Robinson
    2006 “A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society35: 367–392. doi: 10.1017/S0047404506060179
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060179 [Google Scholar]
  33. Tanaka, Hiroko
    1999Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study in Grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tyler, Andrea
    1995 “The Coconstruction of Cross-Cultural Miscommunication: Conflicts in Perception, Negotiation, and Enactment of Participant Role and Status.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition17: 129–152. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100014133
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014133 [Google Scholar]
  35. Walsh, Steve
    2012 “Conceptualising Classroom Interactional Competence.” Novitas-ROYAL6: 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wootton, Anthony
    1975Dilemmas of Discourse: Controversies about the Sociological Interpretation of Language. London: George Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.27.2.03hau
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error