Volume 27, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238



This paper analyses the organization of ‘openings’ in Skype video-mediated conversation. It uncovers order in their apparent complexity by showing the relevance of a particular sequential adjacent pair organization, the appearing/noticing sequence, and its particular instantiation as an appearance-for-the-first-time greeting. The paper shows how this is a crucial resource in establishing a joint video interactional frame for the parties involved. This accounts for the occurrence of some specific phenomena in Skype openings, such as multiple greetings, and for the use of greetings which reflexively index their being occasioned by an appearance and related greeting, such as the French ‘coucou’, even when these do not occur at the start of Skype calls. When analysed this way, Skype openings, though complex, can be seen as an accomplished ‘dance of appearances and multiple greetings’.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 license.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gersheim
    2014Distant Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brubaker, J., G. Venolia, and J. Tang
    2012 “Focusing on Shared Experiences: Moving Beyond the Camera in Video Communication.” Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (June 11–15, Newcastle, UK), 96–105. New York: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/2317956.2317973
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317973 [Google Scholar]
  3. Button, G., and W. Sharrock
    1998 “The Organizational Accountability of Technological Work.”. Social Studies of Science28: 73–102. doi: 10.1177/030631298028001003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/030631298028001003 [Google Scholar]
  4. De Fornel, M.
    1994 “Le cadre interactionnel de l’échange visiophonique.” Réseaux64: 07–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Duranti, A.
    1997 “Universal and Culture-Specific Properties of Greetings.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology7 (1): 63–97. doi: 10.1525/jlin.1997.7.1.63
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1997.7.1.63 [Google Scholar]
  6. Enfield, N. J.
    2011 “Sources of Asymmetry in Human Interaction: Enchrony, Status, Knowledge and Agency.” InThe Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. byL. Mondada, J. Steenswig, and T. Stivers, 285–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.013 [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodwin, C.
    2000 “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics32: 1489–1522. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00096‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X [Google Scholar]
  8. Heritage, J.
    1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” InStructures of Social Action, ed. byJ. M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kendon, A.
    1990Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focussed Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kirk, D. S., A. Sellen, and X. Cao
    2010 “Home Video Communication: Mediating ‘Closeness’.” Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/1718918.1718945
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718945 [Google Scholar]
  11. Licoppe, C., and J. Morel
    2012 “Video-in-Interaction: “Talking Heads” and the Multimodal Organization of Mobile and Skype Video Calls.” Research in Language and Social Interaction45 (4): 399–429. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2012.724996
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.724996 [Google Scholar]
  12. Madianou, M., and D. Miller
    2012Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Mondada, L.
    2010 “Eröffnung und Vor-Eröffnung in technisch vermittelter interaktion: Videokonferenzen.” InSituationeröffnungen: Zur multimodalen Herstellung fokussierter Interaktion, ed. byL. Mondada, and R. Schmitt, 277–334. Narr: Tubingen.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mortensen, K., and S. Hazel
    2014 “Moving into Interaction. Social Practices for Initiating Encounters at a Help Desk.” Journal of Pragmatics62: 46–67. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  15. Neustaedter, C., and S. Greenberg
    2011 “Intimacy in Long Distance Relationships over Video Chat.” Proceedings of CHI 2012 ACM Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Piaget, J.
    1954The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books. doi: 10.1037/11168‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/11168-000 [Google Scholar]
  17. Pomerantz, A.
    1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred / Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” InStructures of Social Action, ed. byJ. M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage, 57–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Relieu, M.
    2007 “La téléprésence, ou l’autre visiophonie.” Réseaux144: 183–223. doi: 10.3917/res.144.0183
    https://doi.org/10.3917/res.144.0183 [Google Scholar]
  19. Sacks, H.
    1992Lectures on Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Schegloff, E.
    1972 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” InDirections in Sociolinguistics. The Ethnography of Communication, ed. byD. Hymes, and J. Gumperz, 346–380. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 1998 “Body Torque.” Conversation65(3):535–596.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 1986 “The Routine as Achievement.” Human Studies9: 111–151. doi: 10.1007/BF00148124
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148124 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  24. Searle, J.
    1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  25. Sunakawa, C.
    2012 “Japanese Family via Webcam: An Ethnographic Study of Cross-Spatial Interactions”. InLecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 7258, ed. byM. Okumura, D. Bekki, and K. Satoh, 264–276. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error