oa Intentionality and meaning

References

1. Alston, W
   (1991) Searle on illocutionary acts. In E. Lepore and R. Van Gulick (eds.), John Searle and his critics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 57-80.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Apel, K.O
   (1991) Is intentionality more basic than linguistic meaning?In E. Lepore and R. Van Gulick (eds.), John Searle and his critics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 31-55.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bach, K. and R. Harnish
   (1979) Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bach, K. and R. Harnish
   (1992) How performatives really work: a reply to Searle. Linguistics and philosophy15: 93-110. doi: 10.1007/BF00635834
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00635834 [Google Scholar]
5. Bange, P
   (1992) Analyse conversationnelle et théorie de l’action. Paris: Hatier/Didier.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bouveresse, J
   (1971) La parole malheureuse. De l’alchimie linguistique à la grammaire philosophique. Paris: Minuit.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Grice, P
   (1957) Meaning. Philosophical review66: 377-388. doi: 10.2307/2182440
   https://doi.org/10.2307/2182440 [Google Scholar]
8. Grice, P
   (1968) Utterer’s meaning, sentence-meaning and word-meaning. Foundations of language4: 1-18.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gripp, H
   (1984) Jürgen Habermas. Und es gibt sie doch - Zur kommunikationstheoretischen Begründung von Vernunft bei Jürgen Habermas. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Habermas, J
    (1976) Was heisst Universalpragmatik?In K.O. Apel (ed.), Sprachpragmatik und Philosophie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 174-272.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Habermas, J
    (1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Fourth, revised edition, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Habermas, J
    (1982) A reply to my critics. Universal pragmatics. In J. Thompson and D. Held (eds.), Habermas. Critical debates. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 269-274.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Habermas, J
    (1991) Comments on John Searle: “Meaning, communication and representation”. In E. Lepore and R. Van Gulick (eds.), John Searle and his critics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 17-29.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Leilich, J
    (1993) Intentionality, speech acts and communicative action. Manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lepore, E. and Van Gulick, R
    (1991) John Searle and his critics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Récanati, F
    (1981) Les énoncés performatifs. Contribution à la pragmatique. Paris: Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Searle, J
    (1969) Speech Acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Second reprint, 1970. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
18. Searle, J
    (1979) Literal meaning. In J. Searle (ed.), Expression and meaning. Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Third reprint, 1985. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
19. Searle, J
    (1983) Intentionality. An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Third reprint, 1985. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173452
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173452 [Google Scholar]
20. Searle, J
    (1986) Meaning, communication and representation. In R. Grandy and R. Warner (eds.), Philosophical grounds of rationality. Intentions, categories, ends. Oxford: Clarendon, 209-226.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Searle, J
    (1989a) Individual intentionality and social phenomena in the theory of speech acts. In Deledalle, J . (ed.), Semiotics and pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3-17. doi: 10.1075/fos.18.03sea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fos.18.03sea [Google Scholar]
22. Searle, J
    (1989b) How performatives work. Linguistics and philosophy12: 535-558. doi: 10.1007/BF00627773
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627773 [Google Scholar]
23. Searle, J
    (1990) Collective Intentions and actions. In P. Cohhen , J. Morgan and M. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in communication. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 401-415.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Searle, J
    (1991) Response: meaning, intentionality and speech acts. In E. Lepore and R. Van Gulick (eds.), John Searle and his critics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 81-102.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Thompson, J
    (1982) Universal pragmatics. In J. Thompson and D. Held (eds.), Habermas. Critical debates. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 116-133.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Weyns, W
    (1990) De sociologie van Jürgen Habermas. Leuven: Acco.
    [Google Scholar]