1887
Volume 3 Number 4
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Correction/repair as a resource for co-construction of group competence, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/prag.3.4.03kea-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.3.4.03kea
1993-01-01
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Besnier, N
    (1989) Information withholding as a manipulative and collusive strategy in Nukulaelae gossip. Language in Society18: 315-41. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500013634
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500013634 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, P
    (1980) How and why are women more polite: some evidence from a Mayan community. In S. McConnell-Ginet , R. Borker , and N. Furman (eds.), Women and language in literature and society.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Duranti, A
    (1984) Lauga and talanoaga: two speech genres in a Samoan political event. In D.L. Brenneis and F. Myers (eds.)Dangerous words: language and politics in the pacific.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Duranti, A. and C. Goodwin
    (1992) Rethinking context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Garfinkel, H
    (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Goffman, E
    (1967) Interaction ritual: essays in face to face behavior. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1974) Frame analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Goodwin, C
    (1980) Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological inquiry50: 3-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00827.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00827.x [Google Scholar]
  9. (1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.)Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodwin, M. H. and C. Goodwin
    (1987) Children’s arguing. In S. Philips , S. Steele & C. Tanz (eds.)Language, gender & sex in comparative perspective.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gumperz, John and Dell Hymes
    (eds.) (1972/1988) Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. New York: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hanks, W
    (1990) Referential practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jefferson, G
    (1972) Side sequences. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1974) Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in society3:2. 181-200. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500004334
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004334 [Google Scholar]
  15. (1978) “Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation.” In J. Schenkein (ed.)Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press, 219-248. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kendon, Adam
    (1985) Behavioral foundations for frame attunement in interaction. In G.P. Ginsburg , M. Brenner , M. Von Cranach (eds.), Discovery strategies in the psychology of action. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Koskoff, Ellen
    (1988) Cognitive strategies in rehearsal. Selected reports in ethnomusicology, Vol. 7.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lakoff, G
    (1975) Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In D. Hockney , W. Harper , & B. Freed (eds.), Contemporary research in philosophical logic and linguistic semantics.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lakoff, R
    (1973) Language and women’s place. Language in society2: 45-80. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500000051
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051 [Google Scholar]
  20. Maltz, D. and R. A. Borker
    (1982) A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In John Gumperz (ed.), Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Philips, S
    (1992) The routinization of repair in courtroom discourse. In A. Duranti , C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pomerantz, A
    (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.57-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sacks, H
    (1967) Lecture 3, Spring Quarter.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sacks, H. , E.A. Schegloff , and G. Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696-735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  25. Schegloff, E
    (1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (ed.)Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (1984) On some gestures relation to talk. In J. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.266-297.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Schegloff, E.A. , G. Jefferson , and Sacks, H
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. LanguageVol. 53, No. 2. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  28. Schegloff, E.A. and H. Sacks
    (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica7: 289-327. doi: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  29. Sloboda, J
    (1985) The musical mind: the cognitive psychology of music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Tannen, D
    (1982) Ethnic style in male-female conversation. In John Gumperz (ed.), Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Testa, R
    (1991) Negotiating stories: strategic repair in Italian multi-party talk. Pragmatics1.3: 345-370.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Weeks, P
    (1985) Error correction techniques and sequences in instructional settings: toward a comparative framework. Human studies8: 195-233. doi: 10.1007/BF00142993
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142993 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.3.4.03kea
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error