1887
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: A cross-linguistic study of interactional grammar, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/prag.4.1.03for-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.4.1.03for
1994-01-01
2019-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    (1978) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chafe, Wallace C
    (1984) How people use adverbial clauses. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley’ Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Danielewicz, Jane and Wallace L. Chafe
    (1985) How ‘normal’ speaking leads to ‘erroneous’ punctuating. In Sarah Warshauer Freedman (ed.), The acquisition of written language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp.213-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Davidson, Judy
    (1984) Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Duranti, Alessandro
    (1988) Ethnography of speaking: toward a linguistics of the praxis. In Frederick A. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey – Volume TV Language: The socio-cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 210-228.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Duranti, Alessandro and Elinor Ochs
    (1979) Left-dislocation in Italian conversation. In Talmy Givón , (ed.), Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press, 377-416.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ford, Cecilia E
    (1992) Variation in the intonation and punctuation of different adverbial clause types in spoken and written English. In Pamela Downing , Susan D. Lima , and Michael Noonan (eds.), The linguistics of literacy. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 3-16. doi: 10.1075/tsl.21.04for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.21.04for [Google Scholar]
  8. (1993) Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554278
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554278 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ford, Cecilia A. , and Sandra A. Thompson
    (1986) Conditionals in discourse: A text-based study from English. In E. Traugott , C. Ferguson , J. Snitzer Reilly , and A. ter Meulen (eds.), On conditionals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (In press) Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Elinor Ochs , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.) Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fox, Barbara A
    (1987) Discourse structure and anaphora: Written and conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627767
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627767 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fox, Barbara , Makoto Hayashi and Robert Jasperson
    (Manuscript). Resources and repair: a cross-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repair. Department of Linguistics, University of Colorado, Boulder.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fujii, Yoko
    (1992) The order and functions of adverbial clauses in Japanese spoken discourse. InMejiro Linguistic Society, 109-123.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Goffman, Erving
    (1955) On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry18:213-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin, Charles
    (1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In George Psathas (ed.). Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, 97-121.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1981) Conversational organization. Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodwin, Charles , and John Heritage
    (1990) Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology19: 283-307. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gumperz, John J
    (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  19. Günthner, Susanne
    (1993) “No. That’s not right. I see it totally different” – Differences in contextualization conventions in German-Chinese argumentations. Paper presented atthe 4th International Pragmatics Conference. July 25–30, 1993, Kobe, Japan.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Heritage, John
    (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim, Kyu-hyun and Kvung-Hee Suh
    (To appear) An interactional account of nikka in Korean converstion. Santa Barbara Working Papers in Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lerner, Gene H
    (1987) Collaborative turn sequences: sentence construction and social action. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Irvine.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1991) On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society20: 441-458. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500016572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016572 [Google Scholar]
  24. Levinson, Stephen C
    (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Linde, Charlotte , and William Labov
    (1975) Spatial networks as a site for the study of language and thought. Language51: 924-39. doi: 10.2307/412701
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412701 [Google Scholar]
  26. Matsumoto, Yo
    (1988) From bound grammatical markers to free discourse markers: history of some Japanese connectives. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 340-351.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Maynard, Senko
    (1992) Speech act declaration in conversation: Functions of the Japanese connective datte. Studies in Language16(1): 63-89. doi: 10.1075/sl.16.1.04may
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16.1.04may [Google Scholar]
  28. (1993) Kaiwa no hyoogen no taishoo: setsuzoku no hyoogen o megutte. [Contrastive analysis of conversational expressions: on the expression of conjunctions.] In Kaiwa Bunseki (ed.), [Conversation Analysis]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.
  29. Mori, Junko
    (To appear) Functions of the connective datte in Japanese conversation. InJapanese/Korean Lingusitics, Vol. 4. CSLI, Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ochs, Elinor , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Sandra A. Thompson
    (eds) (In press) Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ono, Tsuyoshi , and Ryoko Suzuki
    (1992) Word order variability in Japanese conversation: Motivation and grammaticization. Text12: 429-445.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ono, Tsuyoshi , and Sandra A. Thompson
    (Manuscript) What can conversation tell us about syntax?Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Pomerantz, Anita M
    (1978) Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press, 79-112. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50010‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50010-0 [Google Scholar]
  34. (1984a) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments. In J. Maxwell Atkinson , and John C. Heritage , (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (1984b) Pursuing a response. In J. Maxwell Atkinson , and John C. Heritage , (eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 152-163.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ramsay, Violeta
    (1987) The functional distribution of preposed and postposed “if and “when” clauses in written narrative. In R.S. Tomlin (ed.). Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.11.17ram
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.11.17ram [Google Scholar]
  37. Sacks, Harvey
    (1987) On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In Graham Button , and John R.E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50(4): 696-735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  39. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    (1972) Sequencing in conversational openings. In J.J. Gumperz and D.H. Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 346-380.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. (1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 71-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Schegloff, Emanuel A. , Gail Jefferson , and Harvey Sacks
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language53: 361-82. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schegloff, Emanuel A. , and Harvey Sacks
    (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica7(4): 289-327. doi: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  43. Schiffrin, Deborah
    (1985) Multiple constraints on discourse options: A quantitative analysis of causal sequences. Discourse Processes8: 281-303. doi: 10.1080/01638538509544618
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538509544618 [Google Scholar]
  44. (1988) Conversation analysis. In Frederick Newmeyer (ed.), The Cambridge Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 251-276.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Simon, M. E
    (1989) An analysis of the postposing construction in Japanese. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Michigan.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Taylor, Talbot J. , and Deborah Cameron
    (1987) Analysing conversation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.4.1.03for
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error