1887
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

How to do good things with words, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/prag.4.2.04mey-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.4.2.04mey
1994-01-01
2019-08-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua
    (1971) Out of the pragmatic waste-basket. Linguistic Inquiry2: 401-407.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein, Basil
    (1971–1975) Class, codes and control. (3 vols.)London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. doi: 10.4324/9780203014035
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203014035 [Google Scholar]
  3. (1981) Codes, modalities, and the process of cultural reproduction: A model. Language in Society10: 327-363. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500008836
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500008836 [Google Scholar]
  4. (1990) The structuring of pedagogic discourse. ( = Class, codes and control, vol, 4). London & New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203011263
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203011263 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bickhard, Mark & Robert Campbell
    (1992) Some foundational questions concerning language studies: With a focus on categorial grammars and model theoretical possible worlds grammars. Journal of Pragmatics17(5/6): 401-433. (Special Issue on ‘Foundational questions concerning language studies’). doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90060‑O
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90060-O [Google Scholar]
  6. Blommaert, Jan & Jef Verschueren
    (1991) ( = The pragmatics of intercultural and international communication. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. (Pragmatics & Beyond, New Series, vol. 6:3). doi: 10.1075/pbns.6.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.6.3 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bolinger, Dwight D
    (1980) Language – the loaded weapon: The use and abuse of language today. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Britto, Francis
    (1991) Tamil Diglossia: An interpretation. In Hudson (ed.), 1991: Stu dies in Dtglossia (= Southwest Journal of Linguistics 10,60-84
  9. Carnap, Rudolf
    (1942) Introduction to semantics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chomsky, Noam
    (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dillon, George L. , Linda Coleman , Jeanne Fahnestock , and Michael Agar
    (1985) Review article of (i.a.) Levinson (1983). Language61.2: 446-460. doi: 10.2307/414152
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414152 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dongoske, Kurt E. , T.J. Ferguson & Michael Yeatts
    (1994) Ethics of field research for the Hopi Tribe. Anthropology Newsletter35.1: 56 (January). doi: 10.1111/an.1994.35.1.56
    https://doi.org/10.1111/an.1994.35.1.56 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dorian, Nancy C
    (1993) A response to Ladefoged’s other view of endangered languages. Language69.3: 575-579. doi: 10.2307/416699
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416699 [Google Scholar]
  14. Drabble, Margaret
    (1966) The Garrick Year. Harmondsworth: Penguin. [1964]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Duranti, Alessandro
    (1992) The Samoan respect vocabulary. In Duranti & Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an interactive phenomenon,pp.77-99.
  16. Duranti, Alessandro & Charles Goodwin
    (1992a) Rethinking Context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1992b) Rethinking context: An introduction. In Duranti & Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an interactive phenomenon,pp.3-42.
  18. Eco, Umberto
    (1979) The role of the reader. Bloomington, Ind.: The University of Indiana Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fillmore, Charles
    (1972) A grammarian looks at socio-linguistics. [Quoted in Fillmore 1976: 90-Originally a paper given at the Georgetown University Round Table on Linguistics, GURT, 1971].
  20. (1976) Pragmatics and the description of discourse. In Schmidt (ed.), 1976: Pragmatik 1 Pragmatics 2,82-104.
  21. Foucault, Michel
    (1972) The archeology of knowledge. New York: Harper, (translated by A.M. Sheridan ) [French original L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard 1969] .
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Frank, Francine Wattman & Paula A. Treichler
    (eds.) (1989) Language, Gender, and Professional Writing: Theoretical Approaches and Guidelines for Nonsexist Usage. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, Commission on the Status of Women in the Profession.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie H
    (1992) Assessments and the construction of context. In Duranti & Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an interactive phenomenon,pp.147-189.
  24. Grice, H. Paul
    (1975) Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 9. New York: Academic Press, pp.41-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (1978) Further notes on logic and conversation. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp.183-198.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Griffin, Bion
    (1994) Report on CHAGS 7, Moscow, August 1993. Anthropology Newsletter35.1: 12-14 (January).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gumperz, John J
    (1992) Contextualization and understanding. In Duranti & Goodwin (eds.), pp.229-252.
  28. Haberland, Hartmut & Jacob L. Mey
    (1977) Editorial: Pragmatics and linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics1.1: 1-16. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(77)90019‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(77)90019-4 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hager, Frithjof , Hartmut Habcrland & Rainer Paris
    (1973) Soziologie + Linguistik. Stuttgart: Metzler.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hale, Ken , Michael Krauss , Lucille J. Watahomigie & Akira Y. Yamamoto , Colette Craig , La Verne Masayesva Jeanne , & Nora C. England
    (1992) Endangered languages. Language68.1: 1-42. doi: 10.1353/lan.1992.0073
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0073 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hjclmslev, Louis
    (1943) Omkringsprogteoriensgrundlœggelse. Copenhagen: Munksgaard. (reprinted 1993)
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hjelmslev. Louis
    (1954) Prolegomena to a theory of language. Baltimore: Waverly Press. (= Memoir 7 of the International Journal of American Linguistics) . (English translation by Francis J. Whitfield of Hjelmslev 1943).
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Horn, Laurence R
    (1986) Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Georgetown Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1984. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, pp.11-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (1988) Pragmatic theory. In F. Newmcyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Sun’ey. (Volume I, Linguistic Theory: Foundations). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.113-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hudson, Alan
    (cd.) (1991) Stu dies in Dtglossia (= Southwest Journal of Linguistics 10(1)). Denton, Tex.: University of North Texas Press. [Reviewed by Jacob L. Mey (1993), Journal of Pragmatics 20.5: 493-505).
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kecnan, Elinor
    [Ochs] (1976) On the universality of conversational implicatures. Languages and Society5: 67-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kummer, Werner
    (1975) Grundlagen der Texttheorie: Zur handlungs-theoretischen Begründung einer materialistischen Sprachwissenschaft. Reinbek: Rowohlt. [1972]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (1976) Formale Pragmatik. In Schmidt (ed.), 1976: Pragmatik 1 Pragmatics 2,9-52. [1973]
  39. Lacoste, Michèle
    (1981) The old lady and the doctor. Journal of Pragmatics5.2: 169-180. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(81)90004‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(81)90004-7 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ladefoged, Peter
    (1992) Another view of endangered languages. Language68.4: 809-811. doi: 10.1353/lan.1992.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0013 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lakoff. George
    (1971) Presupposition and relative well-formedness. In Danny Steinberg & Leon Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in Philosophy, Linguistics, and Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.329-340. [1968]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Leech, Geoffrey N
    (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Levinson. Stephen C
    (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Maas, Utz
    (1973a) Überblick über grundlegende pragmalinguistische Fragestellungen. InHessisches Institut für Lehrerfortbildung 310: 4-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (1973b) Grundkurs Sprachwissenschaft I: Die herrschende Lehre. München: List.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Mey, Jacob L
    (1974) Some practical aspects of a theory of performance. In Luigi Heilmann (ed.), Proceedings of the Kith International Congress of Linguists 1972. Bologna: 11 Mulino. pp.111-123.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (1976) Qualification, emancipatory language use and pragmatic linguistics. In Fred Karlsson (ed.), Papers from the Third Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Turku: Academy of Finland, pp.275-284.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. (ed.) (1979) Pragmalinguistics: Theory and Practice. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (1981) Right or wrong, my Native Speaker. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), A Festschrift for Native Speaker. The Hague: Mouton, pp.69-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (1987) The dark horse of linguistics: Two recent books on pragmatics. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia20: 157-172. doi: 10.1080/03740463.1987.10412254
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.1987.10412254 [Google Scholar]
  51. (1991) Between rules and principles: Some thoughts on the notion of “Metapragmatic Constraint”. Symposium on Metapragmatic Terms, Budapest, July 2–4, 1990. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientianim Hungaricae39: 1-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (1993) Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. (1994) (in presst) Artificial intelligence in the fourth millennium’. In Petr Sgall et al. (eds.), Festschrift Eva Hajicovâ. Prague.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. (1994) (in press2) What’s in the data?. In Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen (ed.), Festschrift J0rgen Rischel. Copenhagen
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Morris, Charles H
    (1938) Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (= Rudolf Carnapet al., (eds.). International Encyclopedia of Unified Science 2 : 1).
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Partee, Barbara H
    (1972) Opacity, coreference, and pronouns. In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.). Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp.415-441. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑2557‑7_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_13 [Google Scholar]
  57. Phillipson, Robert & Tove Skutnabb-Kangas
    (1994) Linguicide. InEncyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford & Amsterdam: Pergamon/Elsevier. Vol. 4: 2211-2212.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Pinxten, Rik
    (1991) Fieldwork as a form of intercultural communication. In Blommaert & Verschueren (eds.), pp.= The pragmatics of intercultural and international communication,131-144. doi: 10.1075/pbns.6.3.08pin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.6.3.08pin
  59. Posner, Roland
    (1990) Mitteilungen an die ferne Zukunft. In R. Posner (ed.), Warnungen an die ferne Zukunft: Atommüll als Kommunikationsproblem. München: Raben, pp.27-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Proclus
    (1901) Hypotyposis astronomicarum positionum. Leipzig: Teubner. [Characteristics of the positions of the heavenly bodies; orig. in Greek, ca. 455 A. D.]
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Rischel, Jorgen
    (1989) Fieldwork among spirits. Journal of Pragmatics13.6: 861-869. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(89)90005‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(89)90005-2 [Google Scholar]
  62. Ross, John Robert
    (1964) Constraints on variables in syntax. [MIT Ph.D. dissertation; reprinted 1984 as Syntax!]
    [Google Scholar]
  63. (1975) Where to do things with words. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts. New York, San Francisco & London: Academic Press, pp.233-256.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Schmidt, Siegfried J
    (ed.) (1976) Pragmatik 1 Pragmatics 2. München: Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Searle, John R
    (1969) Speech acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  66. Wille, Niels Erik & Peter Harms Larsen
    (1970) Introduktion til pragmatik og pragmatisk analyse. In H.A. Koefoed (ed.), Grammatik, Pragmatik & Tekstbeskrivelse. Nydanske Studier 2: 41-114.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Versteueren, Jef
    (1981) Review of Bolinger (1980). Journal of Pragmatics5.2/3: 295-298. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(81)90011‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(81)90011-4 [Google Scholar]
  68. Verschueren, Jef
    (1994) The pragmatic return to meaning. (Unpublished MS)
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Watzlawick, Paul , Janet H. Beavin & Don D. Jackson
    (1967) Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Wunderlich, Dieter
    (1970) Die Rolle der Pragmatik in der Linguistik. Der Deutschunterricht22.4: 5-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Wunderlich, Dieter & Utz Maas
    (1972) Pragmatik und sprachliches Handeln. Mit einer Kritik am Funkkolleg ‘Sprache’. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Yamaguchi, Haruhiko
    (1994) Unrepeatable sentences: Contextual influence on speech and thought representation. In Herman Parret (ed.), 1994. Pretending to communicate. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. pp.238-253.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.4.2.04mey
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error