1887
Critical perspectives on intercultural communication
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Tang’s Dilemma and other problems, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/prag.4.3.02day-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.4.3.02day
1994-01-01
2019-11-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allwood, J
    (1984) On relevance in spoken interaction. In S. Backman , & B. Kjellmer (eds.), Papers on Language and Literature. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothenburgsis, 18-35.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allwood, J. , Franker, G. , Kós-Dienes, D
    (1985) Förförstaelse och attityder i arbetslivet och syddsfrägor. Papers in Anthropological Linguistics15. (Dept. of Linguistics, Göteborg University).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, Benedict
    (1983) Imagined communities: Some reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barth, Fredrik
    (1969) Ethnic groups and boundaries : The social organization of culture difference. Oslo: Oslo University.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergman, L. , Hedencrona, E. , Kós-Dienes, D
    (1988) Samarbete, förstaelse och attityder – Fallstudier i tvärkulturell kommunikation pâ svenska arbetsplatser. Papers in Anthropological Linguistics18. (Dept. of Linguistics, Göteborg University).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bilmes, J
    (1986) Discourse and behavior. New York: Plenum. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4899‑2040‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2040-9 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blommaert, J
    (1988) Intercultural communication and objects of adaptation. IPrA working document3: 61-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Blommaert, J. , & J. Verschueren
    (1992) The role of language in European nationalist ideologies. Pragmatics2: 355-376.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (eds.) (1991) The pragmatics of intercultural and international communication. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.6.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.6.3 [Google Scholar]
  10. de Certeau, M
    (1988) The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Day, Dennis
    (1993) Multiculturality in practice. In D. Kós-Dienes (ed.), Multiculturality: Warfare or welfare?Göteborg: KIM, 189-202.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (forthcoming a) Communication in context at a multicultural workplace. Stockholm: DEIFO (Delegation for Immigrant Research, Ministry of Labor).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (forthcoming b) Communication in a multicultural workplace: Procedural matters. Proceedings of the L.A.U.D. Symposium on Intercultural Communication 1992. Duisburg: University of Duisburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (forthcoming c) Talk as data, talk as method. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference of Scandinavian Linguistics. Roskilde: Roskilde University.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (forthcoming d) The culture of intercultural communication. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference of Scandinavian Linguistics. Göteborg: Göteborg University.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Duranti, A. , & C. Goodwin
    (eds.) (1992) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gudykunst, W
    (ed.) (1986) Intergroup communication. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Heritage, J
    (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Oxford: Polity Press and Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hinnenkamp, V
    (1987) Foreigner talk, code switching and the concept of trouble. In H. Knapp et al. (eds.), Analyzing intercultural communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1989) “Turkish Man You?” The conversational accomplishment of the social and ethnic category of Turkish guestworker. Human Studies12: 117-146. doi: 10.1007/BF00142842
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142842 [Google Scholar]
  21. (1991) Talking a person into interethnic distinction: a discourse analytic case study. In J. Blommaert & J. Verschueren (eds.), The pragmatics of intercultural and international communication. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 91-110. doi: 10.1075/pbns.6.3.06hin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.6.3.06hin [Google Scholar]
  22. Hofstede, G
    (1980) Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hooper, Robert
    (1986) Speech evaluation of intergroup dialect differences: The shibboleth schema. In W. Gudykunst (ed.), Intergroup communication. Baltimore: Edward Arnold, 127-136.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kós-Diencs, D
    (1987) Communicative situations and language choice at Swedish working places. Papers in Anthropological Linguistics17. (Dept. of Linguistics, Göteborg University).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Levinson, S
    (1992) Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 66-100.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Moerman, M
    (1974) Accomplishing ethnicity. In Roy Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology. Middlesex: Penguin, 54-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pollner, M
    (1974) Sociological and common-sense models of the labelling process. In Roy Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology. Middlesex: Penguin, 27-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rothbart, M. , & M. Taylor
    (1992) Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds?In G.R. Semlin , & Klaus Fiedler (eds.), Language, interaction, and social cognition. London: Sage, 11-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sacks, H
    (1972) On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston, 325-345.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sacks, H. , & E.A. Schegloff
    (1979) Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, 15-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schenkien. J
    (1978) Identity negotiations in conversation. In J. Schenkien (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Schieffelin, B. , & E. Ochs
    (1986) Language socialization across cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Singh, R. , J. Lele , & G. Martohardjono
    (1988) Communication in a multilingual society: Some missed opportunities. Language in Society17: 43-59. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500012586
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012586 [Google Scholar]
  34. Scott, i.C
    (1985) Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Spicer, E.M
    (1940) Pascua: A Yaqui of Arizona. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Varonis, E. , & S. Gass
    (1985) Miscommunication in native/non-native conversations. Language in Society14: 327-343. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500011295
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500011295 [Google Scholar]
  37. Vygotsky, Lev
    (1962) Thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wieder, D. Lawrence , & Steven Piatt
    (1990) On being a recognizable Indian. In Donal Carbaugh (ed.), Cultural communication and intercultural contact. Englewood Cliffs: Lawrence Erlbaum. 45-64.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Zimmerman, D. , & M. Pollner
    (1971) The everyday world as a phenomenon. In J. Douglas (ed.), Understanding everyday life. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 80-103.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.4.3.02day
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error