Volume 4, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bauman, Richard
    (1977) Verbal Art as Performance. Prospect Heights, 111.: Waveland Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauman, Richard , and Charles Briggs
    (1990) Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology19: 59-88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauman, Richard
    (1992) Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology2(2): 131-172. doi: 10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.2.131 [Google Scholar]
  4. Besnier, Niko
    (1993) Reported speech and affect on Nukulaelae Atoll. In Jane Hill and Judith Irvine (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 161-181.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre
    (1988) [1984] Homo Academicus, Peter Collier (trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Briggs, Charles
    (1984) Learning how to ask: Native metacommunicative competence and the incompetence of fieldworkers. Language in Society13(1): 1-28. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500015876
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500015876 [Google Scholar]
  7. (1985a) Treasure tales and pedagogical discourse in Mexicano New Mexico. Journal of American Folklore98(389): 287-314. doi: 10.2307/539937
    https://doi.org/10.2307/539937 [Google Scholar]
  8. (1985b) The pragmatics of proverb performances in New Mexican Spanish. American Anthropologist87(4): 793-810. doi: 10.1525/aa.1985.87.4.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1985.87.4.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  9. (1986) Learning How to Ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interx’iew in social scientific research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165990
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165990 [Google Scholar]
  10. (1988a) Competence in Performance: The Creativity of Tradition in Mexicano Verbal Art. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1988b) Disorderly dialogues in ritual impositions of order: The role of metapragmatics in Warao dispute mediation. Anthropological Linguistics30(3/4): 448-491.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1992a) “Since I am a woman, I will chastise my relatives”: Gender, reported speech, and the (re)production of social relations in Warao ritual wailing. American Ethnologist19(2): 337-361. doi: 10.1525/ae.1992.19.2.02a00080
    https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1992.19.2.02a00080 [Google Scholar]
  13. (1992b) Linguistic ideologies and the naturalization of power in Warao discourse. Pragmatics2(3): 387-404.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1993a) Generic versus metapragmatic dimensions of Warao narratives: Who regiments performance?In J Lucy (ed.), Reflexive Language: Reported speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 179-212. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.011 [Google Scholar]
  15. (1993b) Metadiscursive practices and scholarly authority in folkloristics. Journal of American Folklore106(422): 387-434. doi: 10.2307/541905
    https://doi.org/10.2307/541905 [Google Scholar]
  16. (1993c) “I’m not just talking to the victims of opression tonight – I’m talking to everybody”: Rhetorical Authority and Narrative Authenticity in an African-American Poetics of Political Engagement. Journal of Narrative and Life History3(1): 33-78.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1994) The sting of the ray: Bodies, agency, and grammar in Warao curing. Journal of American Folklore107(423): 139-166. doi: 10.2307/541077
    https://doi.org/10.2307/541077 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bruss, Elizabeth
    (1978) Peirce and Jakobson on the nature of the sign. In R. Bailey , L. Matejka and P. Steiner (eds.), The Sign: Semiotics Around the World, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 81-98.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bühler, Karl
    (1990) [1934]. Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language, D. Goodwin (trans.). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/fos.25
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fos.25 [Google Scholar]
  20. Caton, Steve
    (1987) Contributions of Roman Jakobson. Annual Review of Anthropology16: 223-260. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.16.100187.001255
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.16.100187.001255 [Google Scholar]
  21. (1990) Speech styles, status, and speaker awareness. Semioticavol 80 (1/2): 153-160.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1993) The importance of reflexive language in George H. Mead’s theory of self and communication. In J. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 315-337. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.017 [Google Scholar]
  23. Darnell, Regna
    (1974) Readings in the History of Anthropology. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1990) Edward Sapir: Linguist, Anthropologist, Humanist. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dixon, R.M.W
    (1972) The Dyirbal Language of Northern Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139084987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084987 [Google Scholar]
  26. Duranti, Alessandro
    (1994) From Grammar to Politics: Linguistic Anthropology in a Western Samoan Village. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Errington, J. Joseph
    (1985) On the nature of the sociolinguistic sign: Describing the Javanese speech levels. In E. Mertz and R. Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives. Orlando: Academic Press, 287-310.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (1988) Structure and Style in Javanese: A Semiotic View of Linguistic Etiquette. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Friedrich, Paul
    (1986) The Language Parallax: Linguistic Relativism and Poetic Indeterminacy. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gazdar, Gerald
    (1979) Pragmatics: Implicative, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gorlée. Dinda
    (1992) Translation after Jakobson after Peirce. In E. Tarasti (ed.), Center and Periphery in Representations and Institutions. Imatra: International Semiotics Institute, 55-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hanks, William
    (1990) Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (1993) Metalanguage and pragmatics of deixis. In J. Lucy (ed.), Reßexive Language-Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 127-157. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.008 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hill, Jane
    (1992) Anthropological Linguistics. In W. Bright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 65-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hill, Jane and Bruce Mannheim
    (1992) Language and worldview. Annual Review of Anthropology21: 381-406. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002121
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002121 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hymes, Dell
    (1968) [1962] The ethnography of speaking. In J. Fishman (ed.), Readings in the Sociology of Language, 99-138. doi: 10.1515/9783110805376.99
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805376.99 [Google Scholar]
  37. (1974) [1964] Towards ethnographies of communication. InFoundations in Sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Piladelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 3-27.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (1974) [1970] Linguistic theory and gunctions of dpeech. InFoundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 145-178.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (1974) [1972] Studying the interaction of language and social life. InFoundations in Sociolingistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 29-66.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. (1974) Ways of Speaking. In R. Bauman and J. Sherzer (eds.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 433-451
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (1975) The Pre-War Prague School and Post-War American Anthropological Linguistics. In K. Kocrner (ed.), The Transformational-Generative Paradigm and Modern Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 359-380. doi: 10.1075/cilt.1.20hym
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.1.20hym [Google Scholar]
  42. (1983) Essays in the History of Linguistic Anthropology. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sihols.25
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.25 [Google Scholar]
  43. Jakobson, Roman
    (1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language. Cambridge: MIT Press, 350-377.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (1965) Quest for the essence of language. Diogenes51: 21-37. doi: 10.1177/039219216501305103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/039219216501305103 [Google Scholar]
  45. (1971) [1957] Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. InSelected Writings II: Word and language. The Hague: Mouton, 130-147.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (1971) [1963] Efforts toward a means-ends model of language in interwar continental linguistics. InSelected Writings II, pp.522-526. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (1971) [1968] Language in relation to other communication systems. InSelected Writings. The Hague: Mouton, 697-708.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. (1976) A few remarks on structuralism. MLN91: 1534-1539. doi: 10.2307/2907149
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2907149 [Google Scholar]
  49. (1977) A few remarks on Peirce, pathfinder in the science of language. MLN92: 1026-1032. doi: 10.2307/2906890
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2906890 [Google Scholar]
  50. (1985) [1956] Metalanguage as a linguistic problem. In S. Rudy (ed.), Selected Writings VII: Contributions to Comparative Mythology, Studies in Linguistics and Philology, 1972–1982. Berlin: Mouton, 113-121.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Koerner, Konrad
    (1990) Wilhelm Von Humboldt and North American ethnolinguistics. Historiographia Linguistica17(1/2): 111-128. doi: 10.1075/hl.17.1‑2.10koe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.17.1-2.10koe [Google Scholar]
  52. (1991) Towards a history of modern sociolinguistics. American Speech66(1): 57-70. doi: 10.2307/455434
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455434 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kroskrity, Paul
    , et al (eds.) (1992) Special issue on language ideologies. Pragmatics2(3).
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Leech, Geoffrey
    (1980) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Levi-Strauss, Claude
    (1955) The structural study of myth. Journal of American Folklore68(270): 428-444. doi: 10.2307/536768
    https://doi.org/10.2307/536768 [Google Scholar]
  56. Levinson, Stephen
    (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Liszka, Jakob
    (1981) Peirce and Jakobson: Towards a structuralist reconstruction of Peirce. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society27(1): 41-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Lucy, John
    (1992a) Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620843
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620843 [Google Scholar]
  59. (1992b) Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620713
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620713 [Google Scholar]
  60. (1993) Reflexive language and the human disciplines. In J. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 9-32. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.003 [Google Scholar]
  61. Mannheim, Bruce
    (1986) Popular song and popular grammar: Poetry and metalanguage. Word37(1–2): 45-75.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. May, Jacob
    (1993) Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. McDowell, John
    (1986) Folkloristics. In T. Sebeok (ed.), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics, Volume 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 261-267,
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Mertz, Elizabeth
    (1985) Beyond symbolic anthropology: Introducing semiotic mediation. In E. Mertzand R. Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives. Orlando: Academic Press, 1-19,
    [Google Scholar]
  65. (1993) Learning what to ask: Metapragmatic factors and methodological reification, In J. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159-174. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.009 [Google Scholar]
  66. Moore, Omar and David Olmstead
    (1954) Language and Professor Levi-Strauss. American Anthropologist54: 116-119. doi: 10.1525/aa.1952.54.1.02a00340
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1952.54.1.02a00340 [Google Scholar]
  67. Morris, Charles
    (1938) Foundations of the theory of signs. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Volume 1, no. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Mounin, Georges
    (1974) Levi-Strauss’ use of linguistics. In I. Rossi (ed.), The Unconscious in Culture. New York: E.P. Dutton, 31-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Peirce, Charles
    (1931) Collected Papers, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Petrilli, Susan
    (1992) Translation, semiotics and ideology. TTR5(1): 223-264. doi: 10.7202/037115ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/037115ar [Google Scholar]
  71. Pressman, Jon F
    (1991) Feathers of Blood and Fire: The mythological origins of Avian Coloration. In R. Reina and K. Kensinger (eds.), The Gift of Birds: Featherwork of Native South American Peoples. Philadelphia: The University Museum, 78-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Silverstein, Michael
    (1972) Chinook Jargon: Language contact and the problem of multilevel generative systems, I, II, Language48: 378-406, 596-625. doi: 10.2307/412141
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412141 [Google Scholar]
  73. (1974) Dialectal developments in Chinookan tense-aspect systems, an areal-historical analysis. UAL40, 4(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  74. (1975a) Linguistics and anthropology. In R. Bartsch and T. Vennemann (eds.), Linguistics and Neighboring Disciplines. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 157-170.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. (1975b) La semiotique Jakobsonienne et l’anthropologie sociale. L’Arc60: 45-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. (1976a) Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical o categories in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, 112-171.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. (1976b) Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In K. Basso and H. Selby (eds.), Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 11-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. (1977) Cultural prerequisites to grammatical analysis. In M. Saville-Troike (ed.), Linguistics and Anthropology. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 139-151.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. (1978) Deixis and deducibility in a Wasco-Wishram passive of evidence. In A. Woodbury et al(eds.). Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 238-253.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. (1979) Language structure and linguistic ideology. In P. Clyne et al(eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, 193-207.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. (1981a) Case-marking and the nature of language. Australian Journal of Linguistics1: 227-244. doi: 10.1080/07268608108599275
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268608108599275 [Google Scholar]
  82. (1981b) The limits of awareness. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics, no. 84. Austin: Southwestern Educational Laboratory.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. (1984) On the pragmatic ‘poetry’ of prose: Parallelism, repetition, and cohesive structure in the time course of dyadic conversation. In D. Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 181-199.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. (1985a) The culture of language in Chinookan narrative texts; or, On saying that… in Chinook. In J. Nichols and A. Woodbury (eds.), Grammar inside and outside the clause: Some approaches from the field. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 132-171.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. (1985b) The functional stratification of language and ontogenesis. In J. Wertsch (ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 205-235.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. (1985c) Noun phrase categorical markedness and syntactic parametricization. In S. Choi et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Buffalo: SUNY Press, 337-361.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. (1985d) Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In E. Mertz and R. Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives, 119-257.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. (1986a) Classifiers, verb classifiers, and verbal categories. In D. Feder et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 497-514.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. (1986b) The diachrony of Sapir’s synchronic linguistic description; or, Sapir’s ‘cosmographical’ linguistics. In W. Cowan et al(eds.), New Perspectives in Language, Culture, and Personality: Proceedings of the Edward Sapir Centenary Conference. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 67-106. doi: 10.1075/sihols.41.06sil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.41.06sil [Google Scholar]
  90. (1987a) The three faces of ‘function’: Preliminaries to a psychology of language. In M. Hickmann (ed.), Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought. Orlando: Academic Press, 17-38.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. (1987b) Cognitive implications of a referential hierarchy. In M. Hickmann (ed.), Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought. Orlando: Academic Press, 125-164.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. (1987c) Monoglot ‘standard’ in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. InWorking Papers and Proceedings of the Center for Psychosocial Studies 13: 1-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. (1989) “Singularly like our ideal of a scientist.” In M. Ritchie Key and Henry Hoenigswald (eds.), General and Amerindian Ethnolinguistics: In Remembrance of Stanly Newman. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 45-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. (1991) Problems of Sapir’s historiography. Historiographia Linguisticavol 28 (1): 181-204. doi: 10.1075/hl.18.1.08sil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.18.1.08sil [Google Scholar]
  95. (1993) Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In J. Lucy (ed.), Reßexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 33-58. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004 [Google Scholar]
  96. Steiner, Peter
    (1978) The conceptual basis of Prague structuralism. In L. Matejka (ed.), Sound, sign and meaning: Quinquagenary of the Prague Linguistic Circle. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 351-3385.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Turner, Terence
    (1977) Narrative structure and mythopoesis: A critique and reformulation of structuralist concepts of myth, narrative and poetics. Arethusa10(1): 103-163.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Urban, Greg
    (1981) Agent – and patient-centricity in myth. Journal of American Folklore94(373): 323-344. doi: 10.2307/540155
    https://doi.org/10.2307/540155 [Google Scholar]
  99. (1984) Speech about speech in speech about action. Journal of American Folklore97(385): 310-328. doi: 10.2307/540612
    https://doi.org/10.2307/540612 [Google Scholar]
  100. (1985a) Ergativity and accusativity in Shokleng (Gê). International Journal of American Linguistics51(2): 164-187. doi: 10.1086/465865
    https://doi.org/10.1086/465865 [Google Scholar]
  101. (1985b) The semiotics of two speech styles in Shokleng. In E. Mertz and R. Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives. Orlando: Academic Press, 311-328.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. (1986a) Ceremonial dialogues in South America. American Anthropologist88(2): 371-386. doi: 10.1525/aa.1986.88.2.02a00050
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1986.88.2.02a00050 [Google Scholar]
  103. (1986b) The semiotic function of macro-parallelism in the Shokleng Origin Myth. In J. Sherzer and G. Urban (eds.), Native South American Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 15-57. doi: 10.1515/9783110858129
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110858129 [Google Scholar]
  104. (1988) The pronominal pragmatics of nuclear war discourse. Multilingua7(1/2): 67-93. doi: 10.1515/mult.1988.7.1‑2.67
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1988.7.1-2.67 [Google Scholar]
  105. (1989) The “I” of Discourse. In B. Lee and G. Urban (eds.). Semiotics, Self and Society. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 27-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. (1991) A Discourse-Centered Approach to Culture: Native South American Myths and Rituals. Austin: University of Texas.
    [Google Scholar]
  107. (1992) Semiotics and anthropological linguistics. In W. Bright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol. 3, Oford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. (1993) The represented functions of speech in Shokleng myth. In John Lucy (ed.), Reßexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 241-260. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.013 [Google Scholar]
  109. Urban, Greg and Joel Sherzer
    (1988) The linguistic anthropology of native South America. Annual Review of Anthropology17: 283-307. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.17.100188.001435
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.17.100188.001435 [Google Scholar]
  110. Verschueren, Jef
    (1994) The pragmatic perspective. In J. Verschueren , Jan-Ola Östman , and Jan Blommaert (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics: Manual. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1-22. doi: 10.1075/hop.m
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error