1887
Volume 5, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.5.3.04gre
1995-01-01
2024-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrews, Edna
    (1984) A semantic analysis of Russian prepositions/preverbs O(-) and OB. Slavic and East European Journal 28.4: 477-492.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Apresjan, Ju.D
    (1974) LeksiCeskaja semantika. SinonimiCeskie sredstva jazyka. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (1986) Dejksis v leksike i grammatike i naivnaja model’mira. In A.I. Mixajlov (ed.), Semiotika i informatika. Sbornik naufnyx state], vyp. 28. Moscow: AN SSSR, pp.5-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boguslawski, Andrzej
    (1963) Prefiksacija czasownika we wspólczesnym jçzyku rosyjskim. Wroclaw: Ossolineum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonner, Elena
    (1991) Doéki-materi. New York: Izdatel’stvo imeni Cexova.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bühler, Karl
    (1934) Sprachteorie: Die Darstellungfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bulgakov, Mixail
    (1973) Master i Margarita. Ann Arbor: Ardis.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cienki, Alan J
    (1989) Spatial cognition and the semantics of prepositions in English, Polish, and Russian. Slavistische Beiträge, Band 237. Munich: Otto Sagner.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Clark, Eve
    (1974) Normal states and evaluative viewpoints. Language50: 316-332. doi: 10.2307/412440
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412440 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fillmore, Charles J
    (1966) Deictic categories in the semantics of ‘come’. Word19: 208-231.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1973) May we come in?SemiotikaIX: 97-115.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1975) Santa Cruz lectures on deals 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (1976) Pragmatics and the description of discourse. In S. Schmidt (ed.), Pragmatik II:Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, pp.84-104.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1982) Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis. In Robert J. Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Speech, place and actions: Studies in deixis and related topics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp.31-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Flier, Michael S
    (1975) Remarks on Russian verbal prefixation. Slavic and East European Journal19: 218-229. doi: 10.2307/306777
    https://doi.org/10.2307/306777 [Google Scholar]
  16. (1984) Syntagmatic constraints on the Russian prefixpere- . In Michael S. Flier and Richard D. Brecht (eds.), Issues in Russian morphosyntax. UCLA Slavic Studies, vol. 10. Columbus, OH: Slavica, pp.13-154.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1985) The scope of préfixai delimitation in Russian. In Michael S. Flier and Alan Timberlake (eds.), The Scope of Slavic aspect. Columbus, OH: Slavica, pp.41-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gallant, James
    (1979) Russian verbal prefuation and semantic features: An analysis of the prefix VZ-. Slavistische Beiträge, no. 135. Munich: Otto Sagner.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Grenoble, Lenore
    (1991) Deixis, point of view, and the prefixes po- and pri- in Russian. Die Welt der SlavenXXXVI/l:254-270.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hanks, William
    (1990) Referential practics. Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Herskovits, Annette
    (1986) Language and spatial cognition. An interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hill, Clifford
    (1982) Up/down, front/back, left/right. A contrastive study of Hausa and English. In Jürgen Weissenborn and Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Here & there. Cross-linguistic studies on deixis and demonstration. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.13-42. doi: 10.1075/pb.iii.2‑3.02hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.iii.2-3.02hil [Google Scholar]
  23. Janda, Laura
    (1985) The meanings of Russian verbal prefixes: Semantics and grammar. Michael S. Flier and Alan Timberlake (eds.), The scope of Slavic aspect. Columbus, OH: Slavica, pp.26-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1986) A Semantic analysis of the Russian verbal prefixes ZA-, PERE-, DO-, and OT-. Slavistische Beiträge, no. 192. Munich: Otto Sagner.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Klein, Wolfgang
    (1982) Local deixis in route directions. In Robert J. Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein (eds.). Speech, place and action. Studies in deixis and related topics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp.161-182.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (1983) Deixis and spatial orientation in route directions. In H.L. Pick Jr. and L.P. Acredolo , Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application. New York: Plenum Press, pp.283-311. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4615‑9325‑6_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9325-6_12 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuno, Susumu
    (1978) Three perspectives in the functional approach to syntax. In Ladislav Matejka (ed.), Sound, sign and meaning. Quinquagenary of the Prague Linguistic Circle. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, pp.119-190.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (1987) Functional syntax. Anaphora, discourse, and empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Linde, Charlotte and William Labov
    (1975) Spatial networks as a site for the study of language and thought. Language51: 924-939. doi: 10.2307/412701
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412701 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lyons, John
    (1977) Semantics I and II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Nichols, Johanna
    (1984) The grammatical marking of theme in literary Russian. In Michael S. Flier and Richard D. Brecht , (eds.), Issues in Russian morphosyntax. Columbus: Slavica, pp.170-186.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Prince, Ellen
    (1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole , Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp.233-256.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Russell, Pamela
    (1985) Aspectual properties of the Russian verbal prefix na- . In Michael S. Flier and Alan Timberlake (eds.), The scope of Slavic aspect. Columbus, OH: Slavica, pp.59-75.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Schiffrin, Deborah
    (1994) Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Talmy, Leonard
    (1975) Semantics and syntax of motion. In John Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press, pp.181-238.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (1983) How language structures space. In H.L. Pick Jr. and L.P. Acredolo , Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application. New York: Plenum Press, pp.225-282. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4615‑9325‑6_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9325-6_11 [Google Scholar]
  37. Timberlake, Alan
    (1982) Invariance and and the syntax of Russian aspect. In Paul Hopper (ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics & pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.305-331. doi: 10.1075/tsl.1.18tim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.1.18tim [Google Scholar]
  38. Ullmer-Ehrich, Veronika
    (1982) The structure of living space descriptions. In Robert J. Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Speech, place and action. Studies in deixis and related topics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp.219-250.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wunderlich, Dieter and Rudolf Reinelt
    (1982) How to get there from here. In Robert J. Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Speech, place and action. Studies in deixis and related topics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp.183-201.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Yokoyama, Olga and Emily Klenin
    (1978) The semantics of ‘optional’ rules: Russian personal and reflexive pronouns. In Ladislav Matejka (ed.), Sound, sign and meaning. Quinquagenary of the Prague Linguistic Circle. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, pp.249-270.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yokoyama, Olga
    (1988) Shifters and non-verbal categories of Russian. In Linda Waugh and Stephen Rudy (eds.), New vistas in grammar: Invariance and variation . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.363-386. doi: 10.1075/cilt.49.23yok
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.49.23yok [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.5.3.04gre
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error