1887
Volume 5, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.5.4.01bar
1995-01-01
2025-02-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Attili, G. & R. Benigni
    (1977) Retorica naturale e linguaggio femminilc. Alcune ipotesi sulla relazione tra ruolo sessuale e comportamento verbale nell’interazione faccia a faccia. In G. Mosconi & V. D’Urso (eds), Psicologia e retorica. Bologna: Il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baroni, M.R
    (1983) II linguaggio trasparente. Bologna: 11 Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baroni, M.R. & V. D’Urso
    (1984) Some experimental findings about the question of politeness and women’s speech. Language in Society13: 67-72. doi: 10.1017/S004740450001589X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001589X [Google Scholar]
  4. Baroni, M.R. , V. D’Urso , & M. Pascotto
    (1991) Memory for dialogue in different modes of interaction. Pragmatics1: 453-464.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bates, E. , M. Masling , & W. Kintsch
    (1978) Recognition memory for aspects of dialogue. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory4: 187-197. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.4.3.187
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.3.187 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beck, CS
    . & S.L. Ragan (1992) Negotiating interpersonal and medical talk: Frame shifts in the gynaecologie exam. Journal of Language and Social Psychology11: 47-61. doi: 10.1177/0261927X92111004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X92111004 [Google Scholar]
  7. Berretta, M
    (1984) Per una retorica popolare del linguaggio femminile. In F. Orletti (e.), Comunicare nella vita quotidiana. Bologna: 11 Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bless, H. , F. Strack , & N. Schwarz
    (1993) The informative functions of research procedures: Bias and the logic of conversation. European Journal of Social Psychology23: 149-165. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420230204
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420230204 [Google Scholar]
  9. Campbell, K.E. , D.M. Kleim , & K.R. Olson
    (1992) Conversational activity and interruptions among men and women. The Journal of Social Psychology123: 419-421. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1992.9924720
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1992.9924720 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chambliss, C.A. & N. Feeny
    (1992) Effects of sex of subject, sex of interrupter, and topic of conversation on the perceptions of interruptions. Perceptual and Motor Skills75: 1235-1241. doi: 10.2466/pms.1992.75.3f.1235
    https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1992.75.3f.1235 [Google Scholar]
  11. Crosby, F. & L. Nyquist
    (1977) The female register: An empirical study on Lakoffs hypotheses. Language in Society6: 313-322. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500005030
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005030 [Google Scholar]
  12. Deakins, A.H
    (1993) Women and men in conversation: Normal or neurotic?The American Journal of Psychoanalysis53: 66-75. doi: 10.1007/BF01250074
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01250074 [Google Scholar]
  13. Grice, H.P
    (1975) Logic and conversation. The William James Lectures at Harvard University, Lesson II, 1967. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hjelmquist, E
    (1984) Memory for conversation. Discourse Processes7: 321-336. doi: 10.1080/01638538409544595
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538409544595 [Google Scholar]
  15. (1989) Recognition memory for utterances in conversation. Scandinavian Journal of Psycholgy30: 168-176. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9450.1989.tb01080.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1989.tb01080.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Hjelmquist, E. & A. Gidlund
    (1985) Free recall of conversations. Text5: 169-185.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Horney, K
    (1937) The neurotic Personality of our time. New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Homey, K
    (1945) Our inner conflicts. New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jarvella, R.J. & J.G. Collas
    (1974) Memory for the intention of sentences. Memory and Cognition 2:185-188. doi: 10.3758/BF03197513
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197513 [Google Scholar]
  20. Keenan, J.M. , B. McWhinney , & D. Mayhew
    (1977) Pragmatics in memory: A study of natural conversation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verba! Behavior16: 549-560. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(77)80018‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80018-2 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kintsch, W. & E. Bates
    (1977) Recognition memory for statements from a classroom lecture. Journal of Expérimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory3: 150-159. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.3.2.150
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.3.2.150 [Google Scholar]
  22. Labov, W. & D. Fanshel
    (1977) Therapeutic Discourse. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lai, G
    (1993) Conversazionalismo. Conversazionalismo. Torino: Bollati Bonnghieri.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lakoff, R
    (1973a) The logic of politeness or minding your P’s and Q’s. In C. Corum , T.C. Smith-Stark , & A. Weiser (cds.). Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (1973b) Language and woman’s place. Language in Society2: 45-80. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500000051
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051 [Google Scholar]
  26. Marche, T.A. & C. Petersen
    (1993) The development of sex-related use of interruption behavior. Human Communication Research19.3: 388-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1993.tb00307.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00307.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Rundquist, S
    (1992) Indirectness: A gender study of flouting Grice’s maxims. Journal of Pragmatics18: 431-449. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90083‑N
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90083-N [Google Scholar]
  28. Semi, A.A
    (1985) Tecnica del colloquio. Milano: Cortina.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1992) Dal colloquio alia teoria. Milano: Cortina.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sullivan, H.S
    (1954) The psychiatric interview. New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Tannen, D
    (1989) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery m conversational discourse. Cambridge (Mass.): Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (1990a) You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (1990b) Gender differences in topical coherence: Creating involvement in best friends’ talk. Discourse Processes13: 73-90. doi: 10.1080/01638539009544747
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539009544747 [Google Scholar]
  34. Watts, R.J
    (1992) Acquiring status in conversation: ‘Male’ and ‘female’ discourse strategies. Journal of Pragmatics18: 467-503. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90085‑P
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90085-P [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/prag.5.4.01bar
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error