1887
Volume 5, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Argumentation and inhibition: Sexism in the discourse of Spanish executives, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/prag.5.4.03mar-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.5.4.03mar
1995-01-01
2019-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alonso, L.E
    (1994) El grupo de discusiân en su practica: Memoria social, intertextualidad y action comunicativa (in preparation).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arkin, R.M
    (1981) Self-presentation styles. InImpression management. Theory and social psychological research. New York: Academic Press, pp.311-333. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑685180‑9.50020‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-685180-9.50020-8 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arnold, V.l
    (1987) Teoria de las catastrofes. Madrid: Alianza.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beck, U
    (1992) From industrial society to risk society. Theory, culture and society9: 97-123. doi: 10.1177/026327692009001006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026327692009001006 [Google Scholar]
  5. (1991) La irresponsabilidad organizada. DébatsMarch-June: 31-37.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bion, W.R
    (1974) Experiencias en grupos. Buenos Aires: Paidös.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bodine, A
    (1975) Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular they, sex indefinite he and he or she. Language m Society4: 129-156. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500004607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004607 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boudon, R
    (1992) L ‘art de se persuader des idées douteuses, fragiles our fausses. Paris: Fayard.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bourdieu, P
    (1985) cQué significa hablar?. Economia de los intercambios lingùisticos. Madrid: Akal.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Calero Fernandez, M.A
    (1990) La imagen de la mujer a través de la tradition paremiológica espahola (Lengua y cultura). PhD, Universidad de Lérida.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ducrot, O
    (1984) Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Duranti, A. and C. Goodwin
    (1991) Rethinking context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ervin, S.M
    (1962) The connotations of gender. Words18: 249-261.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fairclough, N
    (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fernandez Lagunilla, M
    (1991) Género y sexo: i, eon trovers ia cientifica o dialogo de sordos. In Bernis et al. (eds.), Adas de las VU Jornadas de investigation interdisciplinaria. Los estudios sobre la niujer de la investigation a la docentia. Madrid: Institute) Universitäre de la mujer y Edieiones Universidad Autönoma.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Foueaull, M
    (1967) Nietzsche, Freud, Marx. Paris: Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Foueault, M
    (1969) L’archéologie du savoir. Paris. Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Foueault. M
    (1971) L’ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Foueault, M
    (1986) Por que hay que estudiar el poder: La cuestión del sujeto. In C. Wright Mills et al., Materiales de sociologia critica. Madrid: La Piqueta.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1994a) Subjectivité et venté. Dits et écrits, vol.IV. Pans: Gallimard, pp.213-218.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (1994b) Le sujet et le pouvoir. Dits et écrits, vol.IV. Paris: Gallimard, pp.222-242.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Freud, S
    (1985) La interpretation de los suehos. Barcelona: Planeta.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fuertes, P
    (1989) El género cornu categoria social en la lengua inglesa. Memoria de licenciatura. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Garcia Messeguer, A
    (1991) Sexo, género y sexismo en espanol. In Bernis et al. (eds.), Act as de las VU Jornadas de investigation interdisciplinaria. Los estudios sobre la mujer de la investigation a la docentia. Madrid: Instttuto Universitäre de la Mujer y Edieiones Universidad Auiónoma.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Garfinkel, H
    (1984) Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Giddens, A
    (1993) Consecuencias de la modernidad. Madrid: Alianza.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Goffman, E
    (1961) Encounters: Two Studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bob-Merrill.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (1967) Interaction ritual: Essays in face to face behavior. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1986a) Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (1986b) Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gome/., C
    . et al (1995) Imagenes de la mujer en situaciones de competitividad laboral. Madrid: Siglo XXI (in press)
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Habermas. J
    (1985) Conciencia moral y action comunicativa. Barcelona: Peninsula.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Habermas, J
    (1987) Teori’a de la action comunicativa. Madrid: Taurus.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (1989) Teoria de la action comunicativa: Estudios y complementos. Madrid: Qitedra.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ibânez, J
    (1979) Mâs alla de la sociologia. El grupo de discusión: Teoria y critica. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ibähe/.. J
    (1990) Cómo se realiza una investigación mediante grupos de discusión. In M. Garcia
  37. Ferrando, J. Ibâfiezy F. AJvira
    (eds.) El anâlisis de la realidad social. Métodos y técnicas de investigation social. Madrid: Alianza (2a.ed.), pp.489-501.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ibânez, J
    (1994) El regreso del sujeto. La investigation social de segundo orden. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Instituteo de la Mujcr
    (1989) Propuestas para evitar el sexismo en el lenguaje. Madrid: Ministcrio de Asuntos Sociales.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lakoff, G
    (1987) Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: Chicago University Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lakoff, R
    (1982) Language and woman’s place. Language m Society2: 45-80. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500000051
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051 [Google Scholar]
  42. Luhmann, N
    (1979) Trust and power. Chichester: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Maneru. A
    (1991) El género ¿accidente gramatical o discriminaciön no accidental?. In Bernis et al. (eds.), Adas de las VII Jornadas de investigation interdisciplinaria. Los estudios sobre la mujer_de la investigation a la docencia. Madrid: Instituto Universitario de la Mujer y Ediciones Universida Autónoma.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Martin Rojo, L
    (1995a) Division and rejection: From the personification of the Gulf conflict to the demonisation of Saddam Hussein. Discourse & Society6.1: 49-80. doi: 10.1177/0957926595006001004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006001004 [Google Scholar]
  45. (1995b) Relaciones de poder y estrategias de resistencia: La aparieiön de una nueva subjetividad femenina. (in preparation).
  46. Martin Santos, L
    (1990) Teoria de las Catastrofes. Politica y Sociedad5: 107-117.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. McConncll-Ginet, S
    (1988) Language and Gender. In F. Newmeyer Linguistics: The Cambridge sun>ey, vol.I: Language: The socio-cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.75-99.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia
    (1988) Gui’a didâctica para una orientation no sexista. El uso no sexista del lenguaje. Madrid: MEC, pp.47-71.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Nissen, U
    (1991) Si, primera ministro. 6lnfluye la feminization de los tîtulos de profesión en la interpretation del masculino en sentido extensivo?. In C. Bernis et al. (eds.), Actas de las VII Jornadas de Investigation Interdisciplinaria. Los estudios sobre la mujer: De la investigation a la docencia. Madrid: Instituto Universitario de la Mujer & Ediciones Universidad Autónoma, pp.343-362.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Ortí, A
    (1986) La apertura y el enfoque cualitativo o estructural: La entrevista abierta y la discusión de grupo. In M. Garcia Ferrando , J. Ibánez y F. Alvira (eds.), El análisis de la realidad social. Métodos y técnicas de investigation social. Madrid: Alianza, pp.153-185.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Peirce, CS
    (1966) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Pence, vol.8, edited by A.W. Burks . Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Perissinotto, G
    (1982) Lingùîstica y sexismo. Dialogos18: 30-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Tajfel, H
    (1981) Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Thorn, R
    (1985) Parabolas y catastrofes. Barcelona: Tusquets.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. (1983) Estabilidad estructural y morfogénesis. Barcelona: Gedisa.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Turner, J
    (1985) Social categorisation and sell-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour. In J. Lawler (ed.). Advances in group processes, vol.2. Greenwich: JAI Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Turner, J. , M. Hogg , P. Oakes , S. Reicher , y M. Wetherell
    (1987) Rediscovering the social group: A self categorisation theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. van Dijk, T
    (1987) Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. van Dijk, T.A
    (1988) News as discourse. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. (1991) Elite discourse and racism. Newbury: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. (1993) Analyzing racism through discourse analysis. Some methodological reflections. In J.H. Stanfield II & R.M. Dennis (eds.). Race and ethnicity m research methods. Newbury Park: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
  62. van Leeuwen, T
    (1995a) Representing social action. Discourse & Society6.1: 81-106. doi: 10.1177/0957926595006001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006001005 [Google Scholar]
  63. (1995b) The representation of social actors. In CR. Gildas (ed.), Studies in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge (in press)
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Verschueren, J
    (1987) Pragmatics as a theory of linguistic adaptation. IPrA Working Document 1.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Violi, P
    (1987) Les origines du genre grammatical. Language85: 15-34. doi: 10.3406/lgge.1987.1526
    https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.1987.1526 [Google Scholar]
  66. Volosinov, V.N
    (1973) Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Weber, M
    (1979) Economia y sociedad. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Wetherell, M. and J. Potter
    (1992) Mapping the language of racism. Discourse and the legitimation of the exploitation. New York: Harvester, Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Wodak. R
    (1995) Critical linguistics. In J. Blommaert , J-O. Ostman , y J. Verschueren (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins (in press). doi: 10.1075/hop.m.cri1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m.cri1 [Google Scholar]
  70. Woodcock, A. y M. Davis
    (1986) Teona de las catastrofes. Barcelona: Citedra.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Zeeman, E.C
    (1977) Catastrophe Theory. Mass.: Adleshon-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.5.4.03mar
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error