1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Explicit and implicit ways of enhancing common ground in conversations, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/prag.6.1.01juc-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.6.1.01juc
1996-01-01
2019-11-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Caffi, Claudia
    (1994) Pragmatic presupposition. In R. E. Asher (ed.). Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon, 3320-3327.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark, Herbert H
    (1992) Arenas of Language Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Du Bois, John W
    (1991) Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research. Pragmatics1.1: 71-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fox, Barbara A
    (1987) Discourse structure and anaphora. Written and conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627767
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627767 [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr.
    (1987) Mutual knowledge and the psychology of conversational inference. Journal of pragmatics11: 561-588. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(87)90180‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90180-9 [Google Scholar]
  6. Green, Georgia M
    (1989) Pragmatics and natural language understanding. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hirschberg, Julia , and Gregory Ward
    (1995) The interpretation of the high-rise question contour in English. Journal of Pragmatics24, 407-412. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00056‑K
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00056-K [Google Scholar]
  8. Houck, Noel
    (1991) Tag questions. A necessary pragmatic context. In: Lawrence Bouton and Yamuna Kachru (eds.). Pragmatics and language learning. Urbana II.: DEIL, 29-38.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jucker. Andreas H
    (1992) The pragmatics of the definitive article in English. In Frens J. H. Dois (ed.). Pragmatic Grammar Components. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 118-133.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jucker, Andreas H
    (1993) The discourse marker well: A relevance theoretical account. Journal of pragmatics19: 435-452. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90004‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90004-9 [Google Scholar]
  11. (1995) Review of Barbara A. Fox (1987 [paperback 1993]) Discourse structure and anaphora. Written and conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Linguistische Berichte 158, 331-333.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Perner, Josef , and Alan Garnham
    (1988) Conditions for mutuality. Journal of semantics6.3/4: 369-385. doi: 10.1093/jos/6.1.369
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/6.1.369 [Google Scholar]
  13. Prince, Ellen F
    (1978) A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language54.4: 883-906 doi: 10.2307/413238
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413238 [Google Scholar]
  14. (1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.). Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 223-256.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik
    (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Schänk, Roger C. and R. P. Abelson
    (1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Schiffrin, Deborah
    (1987a) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  18. (1987b) Discovering the context of utterance. Linguistics25.1: 11-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith, Neil
    (ed.) (1982) Mutual knowledge. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith, Sara W. and Andreas H. Jucker
    (1995) Foregrounding the role of common ground. Paper presented atthe conference on pragmatics and language learning, Urbana, 11., March 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sperber, Dan , and Deirdre Wilson
    (1986) Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stalnaker, Robert C
    (1974) Pragmatic presuppositions. In Milton K. Munitz and Peter K. Unger (eds.). Semantics and philosophy. New York: New York University Press. Reprinted in: Steven Davis (ed.). Pragmatics. A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, 471-482.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.6.1.01juc
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error