1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Is ‘may i ask you a question?’ a question?, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/prag.6.1.02uwa-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.6.1.02uwa
1996-01-01
2019-11-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alston, W.P
    (1991) Soarle on illocutionary acts. In E. Lepore and R. Van Gulick (eds.), John Searle and his Critics. Oxford: Basic Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Athanasiadou, A
    (1994) The pragmatics of answers. Pragmatics4(4):561-574.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Austin. J.L
    (1962) How to do things with words. J.O. Urmson (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Berckmans, R.P
    (1988) Recent work on the performative hvpothesis. Communication and Cognition21(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Derr. R.L
    (1987) Questioning and information/library science. Questioning Exchange1(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Edwards, M. & J.J. Katz
    (1985) Sentence meaning and speech acts. Metaphilosophy16(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9973.1985.tb00148.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00148.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee-Wong, S.M
    (1994) Imperatives in requests: Direct or impolite – observations from Chinese. Pragmatics4(4):491-515.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Leilich, J
    (1993) Intentionality, speech acts and communicative action: A defense of J. Habermas and K.O. Apel’s criticism of Searle. Pragmatics3(2): 155-170.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. van der Meij, H
    (1987) Assumptions of information-seeking questions. Questioning Exchange1(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Meyer, M
    (ed.) (1988) Questions and Questioning. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110864205
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110864205 [Google Scholar]
  11. De Mulder, W
    (1993) Intentionality and meaning: A reaction to Leilich’s “Intentionality, speech acts and communicative action”. Pragmatics3(2): 171-180.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Noica, C
    (1987) Questioning and being. Questioning Exchange1(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rosenberg, J.F. & C. Travis
    (eds.) (1971) Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Searle, J.R
    (1969) Speech Acts: A Study in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  15. Searle. J.R
    (1975) Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 59-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1989) How performatives work. Linguistics and Philosophy12: 535-558. doi: 10.1007/BF00627773
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627773 [Google Scholar]
  17. Uwajch, M.K.C
    (1979) Structures syntaxiques du deuxième registre. Thèse de Doctorat; Département de Linguistique, Université de Montréal.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Uwajeh, M.K.C
    (1993) Communication context in translation. Turjuman2(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1994a) Translatioin context. Turjuman3(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Uwajeh. M.K.C
    (1994b) The case for a performative translatology. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology1994: 2
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.6.1.02uwa
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error