1887
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Pragmatic markers, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/prag.6.2.03fra-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra
1996-01-01
2019-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bach. K & R. Harnish
    (1979) Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blakemore, D
    (1987) Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blackmore, D
    (1992) Understanding utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, P & S. Lcvinson
    (1987) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chafe, W
    (1986) Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Espinal, T
    (1991) Disjunct constituents. Language61A: 726-762 doi: 10.2307/415075
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415075 [Google Scholar]
  7. Fraser B
    (1981) Conversational mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics4.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fraser. B
    (1987) Pragmatic formatives. In J. Verschueren and M. Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.), The pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.179-192. doi: 10.1075/pbcs.5.14fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbcs.5.14fra [Google Scholar]
  9. Fraser, B
    (1990) An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics14. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90096‑V
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90096-V [Google Scholar]
  10. (1991) Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics14.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1996a) On discourse markers. Ms.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Frascr, B
    (1996b) Contrastive discourse markers in English. Ms.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Green, G
    (1987) Pragmatics and natural language understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Harnish, R
    (1983) Pragmatic derivations. Synthese54: 325-373 doi: 10.1007/BF00877685
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877685 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ifantidou-Trouki, E
    (1993) Sentential adverbs and relevance. Lingua90: 69-90. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(93)90061‑Z
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(93)90061-Z [Google Scholar]
  16. Levinson, S
    (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Katriel, T. & M. Dascal
    (1984) What do indicating devices indicate?Philosophy and Rhetoric17(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mey, J
    (1993) Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Morgan, J
    (1978) Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and semantics volume 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Schiffrin, D
    (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  21. Searle, J
    (1969) Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  22. Versenueren, J
    (1987) Pragmatics as a theory of linguistic adaptation. IPrA, Working Document No. 1
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilson, D. & D. Sperber
    (1993) Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua90: 5-25.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error