Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Austin, J.L
    (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bach, K
    (1994) Conversational Impliciture. Mind9: 125-162.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bach, K. and M. Harnish
    (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertuccclli Papi, M
    (1996) Implicit meaning between implicature and explicature. In A. Johnson et al. (eds.), Lo spazio della conversazione. Pisa: Pacini.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bertuccelli Papi, M
    . (in print) Referenza e allusione. Atti del Convegno “Scienza e immaginario”, Pisa 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bertuccelli Papi, M. and C. Perfetti
    (1987) Pragmatics and language rehabilitation, in J. Verschueren and M. Bertuccelli Papi (eds.), The pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbcs.5.53per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbcs.5.53per [Google Scholar]
  7. Blakemore, D
    (1987) Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Basil Blackwcll.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Carston, R
    (1988) Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In R. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representation: The Interface between Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.155-181.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Coulthard, M
    (1977), 4« Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Doherty, M
    (1986) Epistemische Bedeutung. Studia Grammatica. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Grice, H.P
    (1989) Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kiefer, F
    (1987) On Defining Modality. Folia LinguisticaXXI: 68-94.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Parret, H
    (1993) Indirection, manipulation and seduction in discourse. In H. Parret (ed.), Pretending to Communicate. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Récanati, F
    (1989) The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and language4: 294-328. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.1989.tb00258.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1989.tb00258.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson
    (1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1993) Rhetoric and relevance. In J. Bender and D. Wellbery (eds.), The Ends of Rhetoric. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Verschueren, J
    (1995) The pragmatic return to meaning. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology5.2: 127-156. doi: 10.1525/jlin.1995.5.2.127
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1995.5.2.127 [Google Scholar]
  18. Warren, M
    (1982) Inexplicitness. A feature of naturalness in conversation. In M. Baker et al. (eds.), Text and technology’: In honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/z.64.04war
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.64.04war [Google Scholar]
  19. Widdowson, H.G
    (1982) Othello in person. In R. Carter (ed.), Language and Literature. London: Allen and Unwin, pp.41-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error