1887
Interaction-based studies of language
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/prag.6.3.02ler-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.6.3.02ler
1996-01-01
2019-08-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biq, Yung-O
    (1991) The multiple uses of the second person singular pronoun ni in conversational Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics16: 07-321. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(91)90084‑B
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90084-B [Google Scholar]
  2. Clancy, Patricia , Sandra Thompson , Ryoko Suzuki & Hongyin Tao
    (1996) The conversational use of reactive tokens in three Pacific Rim languages. Journal of Pragmatics26(3): 355-387. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00036‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00036-4 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ford, Cecilia E
    (1993) Grammar in interaction: Advervial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554278
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554278 [Google Scholar]
  4. Fox, Barbara and Robert Jasperson
    (in press) A syntactic exploration of repair in English conversation. In P. Davis (ed.) Descriptive and Theoretical Modes in the Alternative Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Heritage, John & D. Greatbatch
    (1991) On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interview interaction. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and Social Structure. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, pp.93-137.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lerner, Gene H
    (1991) On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language In Society20.3: 441-458. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500016572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016572 [Google Scholar]
  7. (1993) Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text13.2: 213-245.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lerner, Gene H. & Tomoyo Takagi
    (1995) On the place of linguistic resources in conversation: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Paper presented atthe Symposium on Conversation, Linguistics Society of America, Summer Institute. Albuquerque, NM.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Levinson, Stephen
    (1988) Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. In P. Drew . & A. Wootton (eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order. Boston: Northeastern University Press, pp.161-227.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ochs, Elinor , Emanuel A Schegloff & Sandra Thompson
    (eds.) (in press). Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sacks, Harvey
    (1975) Everyone has to lie. In M. Sanches & B.G. Blount (eds.), Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use. New York: Academic Press, pp.57-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1992) Lectures On Conversation. 2 volumes. Edited by G. Jefferson , with Introductions by E.A. Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematica for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696-735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  14. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    (1988) Description in the Social Sciences I: Talk-in-Interaction. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics2.1: 1-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (1995) Parties and joint talk: Two ways in which numbers are significant for talk-in-interaction. In P. Ten Have and G. Psathas (eds.), Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (In press) Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In B. Fox (ed.) Studies in Anaphora. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/tsl.33.14sch
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Watson, D. Rodney
    (1987) Interdisciplinary considerations in the analysis of pro-terms. In G. Button & J.R.E. Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organization, pp.261-289.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.6.3.02ler
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error