oa Intonation and clause combining in discourse

References

1. Altenberg, Bengt
   (1984) Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica38.1: 20-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.1984.tb00734.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1984.tb00734.x [Google Scholar]
2. Altenberg, Bengt
   (1987) Causal ordering strategies in English conversation. In J. Monaghan (ed.), Grammar in the construction of texts. London: Pinter, pp.50-64.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chafe, Wallace
   (1984) How people use adverbial clauses. Berkeley Linguistics Society10: 437-449.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chafe, Wallace
   (1988) Linking intonation units in spoken English. In J. Haiman and S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.1-27. doi: 10.1075/tsl.18.03cha
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.03cha [Google Scholar]
5. Cohen, Antonie and Johan ‘t Hart
   (1965) Perceptual analysis of intonation patterns. Proceedings of the Vth International Congress on Acoustics, Liège 1964 : Paper A 16.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cohen, Antonie , René Collier & Johan’t Hart
   (1982) Declination: Construct or intrinsic feature of speech pitch?Phonetica39: 254-273. doi: 10.1159/000261666
   https://doi.org/10.1159/000261666 [Google Scholar]
7. Cooper, William E. & John M. Sorensen
   (1981) Fundamental frequency in sentence production. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4613‑8093‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8093-1 [Google Scholar]
8. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting
   (1996) Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodie perspective on interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in conversation-Interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.11-56. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.003
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.003 [Google Scholar]
9. Cruttenden, Alan
   (1986) Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Du Bois, John W
    (1985) Competing motivations. In J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.343-365. doi: 10.1075/tsl.6.17dub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.17dub [Google Scholar]
11. Ducrot, Oswald , Marie-Claire Barbault
    et al (1975) Car, parce que, puisque. Revue romane10: 248-280.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Erdmann, Peter
    (1990) Discourse and grammar. Focussing and defocussing in English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783111637754
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111637754 [Google Scholar]
13. Fillmore, Charles J
    (1988) The mechanisms of “construction grammar”. Berkeley Linguistics Society General Session and Parasession on Grammaticalization:35-55.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fillmore, Charles J. , Paul Kay
    et al (1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language64.3: 501-538. doi: 10.2307/414531
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
15. Fillmore, Charles J. & Paul Kay
    (1995) Construction grammar. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ford, Cecilia E
    (1993) Grammar in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554278
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554278 [Google Scholar]
17. Ford, Cecilia E
    (1994) Dialogic aspects of talk and writing: Because on the interactive-edited continuum. Text14.4: 531-554.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ford, Cecilia E. & Junko Mori
    (1994) Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: A cross-linguistic study of interactional grammar. Pragmatics4.1: 31-61.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fox, Barbara
    (1987) Discourse structure and anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627767
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627767 [Google Scholar]
20. Givón, Talmy
    (1979) On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Haiman, John & Sandra A Thompson
    (1984) ‘Subordination’ in universal grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society10: 510-523.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Haiman, John & Sandra A Thompson
    (1988) Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/tsl.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18 [Google Scholar]
23. Halliday, M. A K & Ruqaiya Hasan
    (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman, pp.226-273.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hart, J.t. , R. Collier
    et al (1990) A perceptual study of intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627743
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627743 [Google Scholar]
25. Heinämäki, Orvokki
    (1975) Because and since. Linguistica Silesiana1: 135-143.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
    (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Ladd, D. Robert
    (1984) Declination: A review and some hypotheses. In C. Ewen & J. Anderson (eds.), Phonology Yearbook. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtity Press, pp.53-74.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Ladd, D. Robert
    (1988) Declination “reset” and the hierachical organization of utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America84.2: 530-544. doi: 10.1121/1.396830
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396830 [Google Scholar]
29. Lehmann, Christian
    (1988) Towards a typology of clause linkage. In J. Haiman & S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.181-225. doi: 10.1075/tsl.18.09leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.09leh [Google Scholar]
30. Mann, William C
    (1984) Discourse structures for text generation. Information Sciences Institute Research Report127: 1-17.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Mann, William C
    (1992) Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.16
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.16 [Google Scholar]
32. Matthiessen, Christian & Sandra A Thompson
    (1988) The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In J. Haiman & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.275-329. doi: 10.1075/tsl.18.12mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.12mat [Google Scholar]
33. Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A Thompson
    (1995) What can conversation tell us about syntax?In P.W. Davis (ed.), Descriptive and theoretical modes in the alternative linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/cilt.102.07ono
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.102.07ono [Google Scholar]
34. Schiffrin, Deborah
    (1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
35. Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan , Marian Shapley & Elizabeth G. Weber
    (1991) Units of intonation in discourse: A comparison of acoustic and auditory analyses. Language and Speech34: 207-234.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Schleppegrell, Mary J
    (1991) Paratactic because. Journal of Pragmatics16: 323-337. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(91)90085‑C
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90085-C [Google Scholar]
37. Sweetser, Eve
    (1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
38. Thorsen, Nina
    (1978) An acoustical investigation of Danish intonation. Journal of Phonetics6: 151-175.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Ekkehard König
    (1991) The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In E.C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.189-218. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.1.10clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.10clo [Google Scholar]
40. Willems, Nico
    (1982) English intonation from a Dutch point of view. Dordrecht: Foris. doi: 10.1515/9783110853469
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110853469 [Google Scholar]