1887
Interaction-based studies of language
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Intonation and clause combining in discourse, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/prag.6.3.04cou-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.6.3.04cou
1996-01-01
2019-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Altenberg, Bengt
    (1984) Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica38.1: 20-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.1984.tb00734.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1984.tb00734.x [Google Scholar]
  2. (1987) Causal ordering strategies in English conversation. In J. Monaghan (ed.), Grammar in the construction of texts. London: Pinter, pp.50-64.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chafe, Wallace
    (1984) How people use adverbial clauses. Berkeley Linguistics Society10: 437-449.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (1988) Linking intonation units in spoken English. In J. Haiman and S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.1-27. doi: 10.1075/tsl.18.03cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.03cha [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen, Antonie and Johan ‘t Hart
    (1965) Perceptual analysis of intonation patterns. Proceedings of the Vth International Congress on Acoustics, Liège 1964 : Paper A 16.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen, Antonie , René Collier & Johan’t Hart
    (1982) Declination: Construct or intrinsic feature of speech pitch?Phonetica39: 254-273. doi: 10.1159/000261666
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000261666 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooper, William E. & John M. Sorensen
    (1981) Fundamental frequency in sentence production. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4613‑8093‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8093-1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting
    (1996) Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodie perspective on interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in conversation-Interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.11-56. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cruttenden, Alan
    (1986) Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Du Bois, John W
    (1985) Competing motivations. In J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.343-365. doi: 10.1075/tsl.6.17dub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.17dub [Google Scholar]
  11. Ducrot, Oswald , Marie-Claire Barbault
    et al (1975) Car, parce que, puisque. Revue romane10: 248-280.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Erdmann, Peter
    (1990) Discourse and grammar. Focussing and defocussing in English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783111637754
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111637754 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fillmore, Charles J
    (1988) The mechanisms of “construction grammar”. Berkeley Linguistics Society General Session and Parasession on Grammaticalization:35-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fillmore, Charles J. , Paul Kay
    et al (1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language64.3: 501-538. doi: 10.2307/414531
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fillmore, Charles J. & Paul Kay
    (1995) Construction grammar. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ford, Cecilia E
    (1993) Grammar in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554278
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554278 [Google Scholar]
  17. (1994) Dialogic aspects of talk and writing: Because on the interactive-edited continuum. Text14.4: 531-554.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ford, Cecilia E. & Junko Mori
    (1994) Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: A cross-linguistic study of interactional grammar. Pragmatics4.1: 31-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fox, Barbara
    (1987) Discourse structure and anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627767
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627767 [Google Scholar]
  20. Givón, Talmy
    (1979) On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Haiman, John & Sandra A Thompson
    (1984) ‘Subordination’ in universal grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society10: 510-523.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1988) Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/tsl.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18 [Google Scholar]
  23. Halliday, M. A K & Ruqaiya Hasan
    (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman, pp.226-273.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hart, J.t. , R. Collier
    et al (1990) A perceptual study of intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627743
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627743 [Google Scholar]
  25. Heinämäki, Orvokki
    (1975) Because and since. Linguistica Silesiana1: 135-143.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
    (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ladd, D. Robert
    (1984) Declination: A review and some hypotheses. In C. Ewen & J. Anderson (eds.), Phonology Yearbook. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtity Press, pp.53-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (1988) Declination “reset” and the hierachical organization of utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America84.2: 530-544. doi: 10.1121/1.396830
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396830 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lehmann, Christian
    (1988) Towards a typology of clause linkage. In J. Haiman & S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.181-225. doi: 10.1075/tsl.18.09leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.09leh [Google Scholar]
  30. Mann, William C
    (1984) Discourse structures for text generation. Information Sciences Institute Research Report127: 1-17.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (1992) Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.16
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.16 [Google Scholar]
  32. Matthiessen, Christian & Sandra A Thompson
    (1988) The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In J. Haiman & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.275-329. doi: 10.1075/tsl.18.12mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.12mat [Google Scholar]
  33. Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A Thompson
    (1995) What can conversation tell us about syntax?In P.W. Davis (ed.), Descriptive and theoretical modes in the alternative linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/cilt.102.07ono
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.102.07ono [Google Scholar]
  34. Schiffrin, Deborah
    (1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841 [Google Scholar]
  35. Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan , Marian Shapley & Elizabeth G. Weber
    (1991) Units of intonation in discourse: A comparison of acoustic and auditory analyses. Language and Speech34: 207-234.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Schleppegrell, Mary J
    (1991) Paratactic because. Journal of Pragmatics16: 323-337. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(91)90085‑C
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90085-C [Google Scholar]
  37. Sweetser, Eve
    (1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  38. Thorsen, Nina
    (1978) An acoustical investigation of Danish intonation. Journal of Phonetics6: 151-175.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Ekkehard König
    (1991) The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In E.C. Traugott and B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.189-218. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.1.10clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.10clo [Google Scholar]
  40. Willems, Nico
    (1982) English intonation from a Dutch point of view. Dordrecht: Foris. doi: 10.1515/9783110853469
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110853469 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.6.3.04cou
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error