1887
Interaction-based studies of language
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

From subordination to coordination? verb-second position in German causal and concessive constructions, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/prag.6.3.05gun-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.6.3.05gun
1996-01-01
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arndt, Erwin
    (1956) Die begründenden Sätze im Neuhochdeutschen und ihre wichtigsten Konjunktionen. Dissertation. Humboldt Universität: Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chafe, Wallace
    (1984) How people use adverbial clauses. In C. Brugman and M. Macaulay (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.437-449.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Eisenberg, Peter
    (1989) Grundriß der Deutschen Grammatik. Stuttgart: Metzler.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Foley, William A. & Robert D. Van Valin
    (1984) Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ford, Cecilia
    (1993) Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554278
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554278 [Google Scholar]
  6. (1994) Dialogic aspects of talk and writing: Because on the interactive-edited continuum. Text14.4: 531-554.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ford, Cecilia & Junko Mori
    (1994) Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: A cross-linguistic study of interactional grammar. Pragmatics4.1: 31-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gaumann, Ulrike
    (1982) Weil die machen jetzt bald zu’. Dissertation, Universität Mainz.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Green, Georgia
    (1976) Main clause phenomena in subordinate. Language52: 382-397. doi: 10.2307/412566
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412566 [Google Scholar]
  10. Günthner, Susanne
    (1993a) ‘… weil – man kann es ja wissenschaftlich untersuchen’ -Diskurspragmatische Aspekte der Wortstellung in WEIL-Sätzen. Linguistische Berichte143: 37-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1993b) Diskursstrategien in der Interkulturellen Kommunikation. Analysen deutschchinesischer Gespräche. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. doi: 10.1515/9783110953459
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110953459 [Google Scholar]
  12. (1995) Exemplary stories: The cooperative construction of indignation. Versus70/71: 147-175.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Halliday, M.A.K
    .& Ruqaiya Hasan (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A Thompson
    (1994) Introduction. Text14.4: 461-463.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth C. Traugott
    (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Keller, Rudi
    (1993) Das epistemische WEIL. Bedeutungswandel einer Konjunktion. In HJ. Heringer & G. Stötzel (eds.), Sprachgeschichte und Sprachkritik. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, pp.219-247.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. König, Ekkehard
    (1985) On the history of concessive connectives in English. Qiachronic and synchronic evidence. Lingua66: 363-381. doi: 10.1016/S0024‑3841(85)90240‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(85)90240-2 [Google Scholar]
  18. (1988) Concessive connectives and concessive sentences: Crosslinguistic regularities and pragmatic principles. In J.A Hawkins (eds.), Explaining Language Universals. New York: Basil Blackwell, pp.145-166.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. König, Ekkehard & Peter Eisenberg
    (1984) Zur Pragmatik von Konzessivsätzen. In G. Stickel (ed.), Pragmatik in der Grammatik. Düsseldorf: Schwann, pp.313-332.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. König, Ekkehard & Johan van der Auwera
    (1988) Clause integration in German and Dutch conditionals, concessive conditionals and concessives. In J. Haiman & S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.101-133. doi: 10.1075/tsl.18.07kon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.07kon [Google Scholar]
  21. Küper, Christoph
    (1984) Zum sprechaktbezogenen Gebrauch der Kausalverknüpfer DENN und WEIL: Grammatisch-pragmatische Interrelationen. Linguistische Berichte92: 15-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1991) Geht die Nebensatzstellung im Deutschen verloren? Zur pragmatischen Funktion der Wortstellung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Deutsche Sprache19: 133-158.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lehmann, Christian
    (1988) Towards a typology of clause linkage. In J. Haiman & S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.181-226. doi: 10.1075/tsl.18.09leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.09leh [Google Scholar]
  24. (1991) Grammaticalization and related changes in contemporary German. In E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.493-535. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.2.21leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.21leh [Google Scholar]
  25. Lerner, Gene
    (1991) On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society20.3: 441-458. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500016572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016572 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson
    (1994) Interaction and Syntax in the Structure of Conversational Discourse. Manuscript. University of California.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pawley, Andrew & Frances H. Syder
    (1983) Natural selection in syntax: Notes on adaptive variation and change in vernacular and literary grammar. Journal of Pragmatics7: 551-579. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(83)90081‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90081-4 [Google Scholar]
  28. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sacks, Harvey
    (1987) On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J.R. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters, pp.54-69.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sandig, Barbara
    (1973) Zur historischen Kontinuität normativ diskriminierender syntaktischer Muster in spontaner Sprechsprache. Deutsche Sprache3: 37-57.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Selting, Margret
    (1995) Prosodie im Gespräch. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110934717
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110934717 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sweetser, Eve E
    (1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  33. Thompson, Sandra A
    (1987) ‘Concessive’ as a discourse relation in expository written English. In: B. Joseph & A.M. Zwickey (eds.), A Festschrift for Use Lehiste. Ohio State University, pp.64-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Ekkehard König
    (1991) The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott & Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.189-218. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.1.10clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.10clo [Google Scholar]
  35. Wegener, Heide
    (1994) weil – das hat schon seinen Grund. Zur Verbstellung in Kausalsätzen mit WEIL im gegenwärtigen Deutsch. Deutsche Sprache4: 289-305.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Willems, Klaus
    (1994) weil es hat mit Bedeutung nicht viel zu tun… Zum Sprachwandel einer Konjunktion. Deutsche Sprache3: 261-279.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.6.3.05gun
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error