Interaction-based studies of language
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Auer, Peter
    (1991) Vom Ende deutscher Sätze. Zeitschrift ßr Germanistische Linguistik19: 139-157.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (1992) The neverending sentence: Rightward expansion in spoken language. In: M. Kontra & T. Vâradi (eds.), Studies in spoken language: English, German, Finno-Ugric. Budapest:, pp.41-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (1996) On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. In: E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds.).Prosody in conversation. Interactional studies,
  4. Auer, Peter & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    (1996) Rhythmus und Tempo konversationeller Alltagssprache. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik96: 78-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Auer, Peter & Aldo di Luzio
    (eds.) (1992) The contextualization of language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolinger, Dwight
    (1986) Intonation and its parts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1989) Intonation and its uses. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen, Antonie & Johan t’Hart
    (1967) On the anatomy of intonation. Lingua19: 177-192. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(69)90118‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(69)90118-1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    (1993) English speech rhythm. Form and function in everyday verbal interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.25
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.25 [Google Scholar]
  10. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting
    (1996) Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodie perspective on interaction. In: E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds.).Prosody in conversation. Interactional studies,
  11. (eds.) (1996) Prosody in conversation. Interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511597862
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862 [Google Scholar]
  12. Crystal, David
    (1979) Neglected grammatical factors in conversational English. In: S. Greenbaum , G. Leech & J. Svartvik (eds.), Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk. London, New York: Longman, pp.153-166.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. DuBois, John W. , Stephan Schuetze-Coburn , Susanna Cummings & Danae Paolino
    (1993) Outline of Discourse Transcription. In: J.A Edwards & M.D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data. Transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale etc.: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.45-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Essen, Otto von
    (1964) Grundzüge der hochdeutschen Satzintonation. Ratingen: Henn.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ford, Cecilia , Barbara A Fox & Sandra A Thompson
    (1995) Practices in the construction of turns: The ‘TCU’ revisited. Draft prepared for theSymposium on Grammar and Interaction, August 23–26, 1995, Odense University, Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gumperz, John
    (1982) Discourse strategies. London: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  17. (1984) Ethnography in urban communication. In: P. Auer & A di Luzio (eds.), Interpretive sociolinguistics. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gumperz, John J
    (1990) Contextualization and understanding. In: A Duranti & C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.229-252.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1992) Contextualization revisited. In: P. Auer & A. di Luzio (eds.), pp.The contextualization of language,39-54. doi: 10.1075/pbns.22.04gum
  20. Heritage, John
    (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press, pp.299-345.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hirschberg, Julia & Gregory Ward
    (1992) The influence of pitch range, duration, amplitude and spectral features on the interpretation of the rise-fall-rise intonation contour in English. Journal of Phonetics20: 241-251.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1995) The interpretation of the high-rise question contour in English. Journal of Pragmatics24: 407-412. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00056‑K
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00056-K [Google Scholar]
  23. Jacobs, Joachim
    (1988) Fokus-Hintergrund-Gliederung und Grammatik. In: H. Altmann (ed.), (1988) Intonationsforschungen. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp.89-134.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jefferson, Gail
    (1979) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In: J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp.219-248.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (1986) Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Human Studies9: 153-183. doi: 10.1007/BF00148125
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148125 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ladd, D. Robert
    (1980) The structure of intonational meaning. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Local, John
    (1992) Continuing and restarting. In: P. Auer & A di Luzio (eds.), pp.273-296.
  28. Local, John & John Kelly
    (1986) Projection and ‘silences’: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies9: 185-204. doi: 10.1007/BF00148126
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148126 [Google Scholar]
  29. Local, John , John Kelly & William H.G. Wells
    (1986) Towards a phonology of conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English. Journal of Linguistics22: 411-437. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700010859
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010859 [Google Scholar]
  30. Local, John , William H.G. Wells & Mark Sebba
    (1985) Phonology for conversation. Phonetic aspects of turn delimitation in London Jamaican. Journal of Pragmatics9: 309-330. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(85)90029‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90029-3 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pierrehumbert, Janet & Julia Hirschberg
    (1990) The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In: P.R. Cohen & J. Morgan (eds.), Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp.271-311.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Quirk, Randolph & Sidney Greenbaum
    (1978) A university grammar of English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sacks, Harvey
    (1971) Das Erzählen von Geschichten innerhalb von Unterhaltungen. In: R. Kjolseth & F. Sack (eds.), Zur Soziologie der Sprache. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp.307-314. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑663‑05383‑5_24
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-05383-5_24 [Google Scholar]
  34. (1986) Some considerations of a story told in ordinary conversations. Poetics15: 127-138. doi: 10.1016/0304‑422X(86)90036‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(86)90036-7 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel ASchegloff & Gail Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696-735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  36. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    (1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In: T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp.261-286.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In: D. Tannen (ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics
    1981 Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1982, pp.71-91.
  39. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    (1987) Analyzing single episodes of interaction. An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychological Quarterly50.2: 101-114. doi: 10.2307/2786745
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786745 [Google Scholar]
  40. (1988) Discourse as an interactional achievement II: An exercise in conversation analysis. In: D. Tannen (ed.), Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, pp.135-158.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Selting, Margret
    (1995a) Prosodie im Gespräch. Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie der Konversation. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110934717
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110934717 [Google Scholar]
  42. (1995b) Der ‘mögliche Satz’ als interaktiv relevante syntaktische Kategorie. Linguistische Berichte158: 298-325.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Streeck, Jürgen
    (1989) Methodologische Aspekte der linguistischen Analyse von Gesprächen. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung42.2: 192-207.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Tannen, Deborah
    (1979) What’s in an frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In: R.O. Freedle (ed.), New directions in discourse processing. Norwood: Ablex, pp.137-181.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Uhmann, Susanne
    (1991) Fokusphonologie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (1993) Das Mittelfeld im Gespräch. In: M. Reis (ed.), Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp.313-354.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Wells, Bill & Sue Peppé
    (1996) Ending up in Ulster. In: E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds.).Prosody in conversation. Interactional studies,
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error