1887
Conflict and violence in pragmatic research
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Introduction, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/prag.7.4.01bri-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.7.4.01bri
1997-01-01
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aarsleff, Hans
    (1982) From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the study of language and intellectual history. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauman, Richard & Charles L. Briggs
    (1997) Authorizing discourse: The creation of power in scholarly and popular discourse. Ms. in possession of authors.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Briggs, Charles L
    (ed.) (1996) Disorderly discourse: Narrative, conflict, and inequality. New Y ork: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chomsky, Noam
    (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gal, Susan , & Kathryn A. W oolard
    (1995) Constructing languages and publics. Special issue of Pragmatics, vol. 5, no. 2.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Garfinkel, Harold
    (1991) Respecification: Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society (I) — an announcement of studies. In Graham Button (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.10-19. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611827.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611827.003 [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie Harness Goodwin
    (1996) Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes. In Yrjö Engelström and David Middleton (eds.), Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.61-95. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174077.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174077.004 [Google Scholar]
  8. Grimshaw, Allen D
    (ed.) (1990) Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gruner, Rolf
    (1977) Theory and power: On the character of modern sciences. Amsterdam: B. R. Gruner.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gumperz, John J
    (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hall, A. Rupert
    (1963) From Galileo to Newton, 1630–1720. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Heritage, John
    (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Heritage, John , & J. Maxwell Atkinson
    (1984) Introduction. In J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, pp.1-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hobbes, Thomas
    (1968[1651]) The Leviathan. C.B. MacPherson (ed.). Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Joseph, John E. & Talbot J. Taylor
    (eds.) (1990) Ideologies of language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee, John R.E
    (1987) Prologue: Talking organisation. In Graham Button and John R.E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp.19-53.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Leech, Geoffrey N
    (1983) Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Locke, John
    (1959[1690]) An essay concerning human understanding. (2 vols.)New York: Dover.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MacPherson, C.B
    (1962) The political theory of possessive individualism: From Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. O’Connor, Patricia
    (ed.) (1995) Discourse of violence. Special issue of Discourse & Societyvol. 61, no. 13.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Parsons, Talcott
    (1949) The structure of social action. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Psathas, George
    (1995) Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sacks, Harvey
    (1984) Notes on methodology. In J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action : Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, pp.21-27.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sacks, Harvey , Emannuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50.4: 696-735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  25. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    (1959[1916]).A course in general linguistics. C. Bally and A. Schehaye (eds.); Wade Baskin (trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schieffelin, Bambi , Kathryn A. Woolard & Paul V. Kroskrity
    (eds.) (in press) Language ideologies. New York: Oxford University Press doi: 10.1002/9780470996522.ch22
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996522.ch22 [Google Scholar]
  27. Silverstein, Michael
    (1976) Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Keith Basso and Henry A. Selby (eds.), Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, pp.11-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (1993) Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In John A. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.33-58. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.7.4.01bri
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error