Conflict and violence in pragmatic research
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


If the thread that connects these papers one to another is the theme of violence and social struggle, they are at the same time quite diverse in approaches and subject matters. So diverse, in fact, that in order to see how they present material on violence and social struggle, we must begin by situating the variety of sociocultural material they bring to our attention in the story-lines, as it were, of their respective approaches. This grouping, or re-grouping, of the papers will, I think, lead us to seeing what is involved in giving what we might term an adequate pragmatic account of the phenomena they treat, though it is not my intention here to give an actual re-analysis of the various materials. My purpose is rather to be able to relate such criteria of adequacy to the particular commitments we have as social scientists to elucidating and thereby engaging with conditions that people more generally face in the inherent politics of sociocultural experience.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bateson, Gregory
    (1936) Naven. Cambridge: [Cambridge] University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bourdieu, Pierre
    (1991) Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Goffman, Erving
    (1979) Footing. Semiotica25: 1-29. doi: 10.1515/semi.1979.25.1‑2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Latour, Bruno
    (1984) Science in action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mehan, Hugh
    (1996) The construction of an LD student: A case study in the politics of representation. In M. Silverstein & G. Urban (eds.), Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.253-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Putnam, Hilary
    (1975) The meaning of ‘meaning’. InPhilosophical papers, vol. 2: Mind, language, and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.215-71. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511625251.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625251.014 [Google Scholar]
  7. Silverstein, Michael
    (1992) The indeterminacy of contextualization: When is enough enough?In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.55-76. doi: 10.1075/pbns.22.05sil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22.05sil [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error