oa Discursive hegemony in the Kennedy Smith rape trial

References

1. Arminen, Ilkka
   (1996) On the moral and interactional relevancy of self-repairs for life stories of members of alcoholics anonymous. Text16.4: 449-480.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Atkinson, J. Maxwell
   (1978) Discovering suicide: Studies in the social organization of sudden death. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Besnier, Niko
   (1990) Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology19: 419-451. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.002223
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.002223 [Google Scholar]
4. Briggs, Charles
   (1984) Learning to ask: Native metacommunicative competence and the incompetence of field workers. Language in Society13.1: 1-28. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500015876
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500015876 [Google Scholar]
5. Button, Graham
   (1992) Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in job interviews. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.212-231.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Coupland, Nikolas , Justine Coupland , & Howard Giles
   (1991) anguage, society, and the elderly. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Drew, Paul
   (1992) Contested evidence in the courtroom: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.470-520.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Drew, Paul & John Heritage
   (1992) Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.1-65.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Duranti, Alessandro & Charles Goodwin
   (eds.) (1992) Rethinking context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Editors
    Editors (1995) Confronting the new challenges of scientific evidence. Harvard Law Review108: 1481-1603. doi: 10.2307/1341808
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1341808 [Google Scholar]
11. Erickson, Frederick & Jeffrey Schultz
    (1982) The counselor as gatekeeper. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ferguson, Charles
    (1977) Baby talk as a simplified register. In C. Snow & C. Ferguson (eds.), Talking to children. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.209-235.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Goodwin, Charles
    (1994) Transparent vision. American Anthropologist93.3: 606-633. doi: 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100 [Google Scholar]
14. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & Charles Goodwin
    (1986) Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica62.1/2: 51-75. doi: 10.1515/semi.1986.62.1‑2.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.29 [Google Scholar]
15. Haydock, Roger & John Sonsteng
    (1990) Trial theories, tactics, and techniques. St. Paul: West.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Jayyusi, Lena
    (1984) Categorization and the moral order. Boston: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jefferson, Gail
    (1974) Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society2: 181-199. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500004334
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004334 [Google Scholar]
18. Jones, Carol
    (1994) Expert witnesses. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Keating, Elizabeth
    (1993) Correction/repair as a resource for co-construction of group competence. Pragmatics3.4: 411-423.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Mandelbaum, Jenny
    (1990/1991) Beyond mundane reason: Conversation analysis and context. Research on language and social interaction24: 333-350. doi: 10.1080/08351819009389346
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351819009389346 [Google Scholar]
21. Matoesian, Gregory
    (1993) Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Matoesian, Gregory
    (1995) Language, law, and society: Policy implications of the Kennedy Smith rape trial. Law and Society Review29.4: 669-701. doi: 10.2307/3053918
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3053918 [Google Scholar]
23. Matoesian, Gregory
    (1997a) `You were interested in him as a person?’: Rhythms of domination in the Kennedy Smith rape trial. Law and Social Inquiry22.1: 55-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1747‑4469.1997.tb00302.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1997.tb00302.x [Google Scholar]
24. Matoesian, Gregory
    (1997b) `I’m sorry we had to meet under these circumstances’: Verbal artistry (and wizardry) in the Kennedy Smith rape trial. In M. Travers & J. Manzo (eds.), Law in action: Ethnomethodological and conversation analytic approaches to law. London: Dartmouth.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Mauet, Thomas
    (1996) Trial techniques. 4th. edition. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mertz, Elisabeth
    (1985) Beyond symbolic anthropology: Introducing semiotic mediation. In E. Mertz & R. Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic mediation. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Mertz, Elisabeth
    (1992) Language, law, and social meaning: Linguistic/anthropological contributions to the study of law. Law and Society Review26: 413-45. doi: 10.2307/3053903
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3053903 [Google Scholar]
28. Mertz, Elisabeth
    (1993) Linguistic ideology and praxis in U.S. law school classrooms. Pragmatics3.2: 325-34.
    [Google Scholar]
29. O’Barr, William
    (1982) Linguistic evidence. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Peterson, Joseph
    (1987) Use of forensic evidence by the police and courts. Research in brief. Washington D.C.: National Institute of Justice, pp.1-6. doi: 10.1016/0006‑8993(87)90233‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(87)90233-2 [Google Scholar]
31. Peterson, Joseph , John Ryan , Pauline Houlden , and Steven Mihajlovic
    (1987) The uses and effects of forensic science in the adjudication of felony cases. Journal of Forensic Sciences32.6: 1730-1753.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Renoe, Curtis E
    (1996) Seeing is believing?: Expert testimony and the construction of interpretative authority in an American trial. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. 9.26: 115-137. doi: 10.1007/BF01105505
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01105505 [Google Scholar]
33. Sacks, Harvey
    (1992) Lectures on conversation, Vol.1. New York: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Saks, Michael & Richard Duizend
    (1983) The use of scientific evidence in litigation.Washington, D.C.: National Center for State Courts.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Schegloff, Emanual
    (1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp.261-286.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Schegloff, Emanuel , Gail Jefferson , & Harvey Sacks
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language53: 361-382. doi: 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
37. Silverstein, Michael
    (1981) The limits of awareness. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics 84. Austin: Southwest Educational Lab.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Silverstein, Michael
    (1993) Metapragmatic discourse and the metapragmatic function. In J. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive language. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.33-58. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004 [Google Scholar]
39. Watson, Rod
    (1996) Some general reflections on Categorization’ and Sequence’ in the analysis of conversation. In S. Hester & P. Eglin (eds.), Culture in action. Washington D.C.: University Press of America, pp.49-75.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Wilson, James Q
    (1997) Moral judgment. New York: Basic.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Woolard, Kathryn
    (1993) Language ideology: Issues and approaches. Pragmatics2.3: 235-249.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Woolard, Kathryn & Bambi Schieffelin
    (1994) Language ideology. In W. Durham , E. Daniel , & B. Schieffelin (eds.), Annual Review of Anthropology. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Inc., 23: 55-82. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415 [Google Scholar]