Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baym, N
    (1995) The emergence of community in computer mediated communication. In St. Jones (ed), pp.Cybersociety. Computer-mediated communication and community,138-164.
  2. Bilmes, J
    (1988) The concept of preference in conversation analysis. Language in Society17: 161-181. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500012744
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012744 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, P. & St. Levinson
    (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Collot, M. & N. Belmore
    (1996) Electronic language: A new variety of English. In S. Herring (ed), pp.Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives,13-29.
  5. DuBartell, D
    (1995) Discourse features of computer-mediated communication: ‘Spoken like’ and ‘written like’. In B. Warvik , S.-K. Tanskanen , & R. Hiltunen (eds), Organization in discourse. Proceedings from the Turku Conference. Turku: University of Turku, pp.231-241.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Eklundh, K.S
    (1986) Dialogue processes in computer mediated communication. Linköping: Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, 6.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Garton, L. & B. Wellman
    (1995) Social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: A review of the research literature. Communication Yearbook18: 434-453.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gruber, H
    (1996) Streitgespräche. Zur Pragmatik einer Diskursform. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (1997a) E-mail discussion lists: A new genre of scholarly communication?InWiener Linguistische Gazette, 60-61: 24-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1997b) Thematische Progression in Internet Diskussionslisten. In R. Weingarten (ed.), Sprachwandel durch den Computer. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp.70-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Halliday, M.A.K
    (1994) An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Herring, S
    (1996a) Posting in a different voice: Gender and ethics in CMC. In Ch. Ess (Ed), Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp.115-147. doi: 10.1075/pbns.39
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39 [Google Scholar]
  13. (1996b) Linguistic and critical analysis of computer-mediated communication: Some ethical and scholarly considerations. To appear in Jim Thomas (ed.), The information society. (special issue on “The ethics of fair practices for collecting social science data in cyberspace”)12/2: 153-168.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (1996c) Two variants of an electronic message schema. In S. Herring (ed), pp.Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication,81-109. doi: 10.1075/pbns.39.08her
  15. (ed.) (1996) Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.39
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jones, St
    (ed.) (1995) Cybersociety. Computer-mediated communication and community. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones, R. & R. Spiro
    (1995) Contextualization, cognitive flexibility, and hypertext: The convergence of interpretive theory, cognitive psychology, and advanced information technologies. In S. Star (ed.), The cultures of computing. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.146-158.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Korenman, J. & N. Wyatt
    (1996) Group dynamics in an e-mail forum. In S. Herring (ed.), pp.Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives,225-243.
  19. Kotthoff, H
    (1993) Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society22: 193-216. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500017103
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017103 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lea, M
    . et al (1992) “Flaming” in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (ed.), pp.Contexts of computer-mediated communication,89-113.
  21. (ed.) (1992) Contexts of computer-mediated communication. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Leech, G. & M. Short
    (1981) Style in fiction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Levinson, St
    (1984) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Marková, I
    (1990) A three-step process as a unit of analysis in dialogue. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (eds.), The dynamics of dialogue. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp.129-147.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ng, S.H. , M. Brooke , & M. Dunne
    (1995) Interruption and influence in discussion groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology14.4: 369-382. doi: 10.1177/0261927X950144003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X950144003 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ng, S.H. & J. Bradac
    (1993) Power in language. London: Sage. doi: 10.1016/0379‑6779(93)90555‑B
    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-6779(93)90555-B [Google Scholar]
  27. Ochs-Keenan, E. & B. Schieffelin
    (1976) Topic as a discourse notion: A study of topic in the conversations of children and adults. In Ch.N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, pp.225-385.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pomerantz, A
    (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes. In M.J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), pp.57-102.
  29. Reid, E
    (1994) Cultural formations in text-based virtual realities. University of Melbourne: MA-Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ruedenberg, L. , D. Brenda , & Y. Rosenbaum-Tamari
    (1995) Virtual virtuosos: Play and performance at the computer keybord. EJC: Electronic Journal of Communication5.4: 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sacks, H. , E. Schegloff , & G. Jefferson
    (1974) A simpliest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language50: 697-735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  32. Shields, R
    (ed.) (1996) Cultures of Internet. Virtual spaces, real histories, living bodies. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Star, L
    (ed.) (1995) The culture of computing. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Uhlirova, L
    (1994) e-mail as a new subvariety of medium and its effects upon the message. In S. Cmerjrkova & F. Stich (eds.), The syntax of sentence and text (Festschrift for F. Danes). Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/llsee.42.25uhl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/llsee.42.25uhl [Google Scholar]
  35. Yates, S
    (1996) Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing. In S. Herring (ed.), pp.Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives,29-47. doi: 10.1075/pbns.39.05yat
  36. Wetzstein, Th
    . et al (1995) Datenreisende. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑322‑92506‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-92506-0 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error