oa Ideologies of politeness

References

1. Barthes, R.
   (1974) Mythen des Alltags. Frankfurt/M (German translation of: Mythologies. Paris: Seuil).
   [Google Scholar]
2. Billig, M.
   (1982) Ideology and Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brown, P. and S.D. Levinson
   (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. van Dijk, T.A.
   (1998) Ideology. London: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Eco, U.
   (1975) Trattato di semiotica generale. Milano: Bompiani.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gipper, H.
   (1978) Denken ohne Sprache?Düsseldorf.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Habermas, J.
   (1971) Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie. Frankfurt/M.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Harris, N.
   (1970) Die Ideologien in der Gesellschaft. München: Beck.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.
   (1997) A multilevel approach in the study of talk in interaction. Pragmatics7(1): 1–20.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Kienpointner, M.
    (1997) Varieties of rudeness. Functions of Language4(2): 251–287. doi: 10.1075/fol.4.2.05kie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.4.2.05kie [Google Scholar]
11. Kroskrity, P. , B. Schieffelin and K. Woolard
    (eds.)(1992) Language Ideologies. Special Issue of Pragmatics2(3): 235–453.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Lakoff, R.
    (1975) Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Leech, G.
    (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Watts, R.J.
    (1992) Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In R.J. Watts , S. Ide and K. Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice,43–69.
15. Watts, R.J. , S. Ide and K. Ehlich
    (eds.)(1992) Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Woolard, K.
    (1992) Language Ideology: Issues and Approaches. In: P. Kroskrity , B. Schieffelin and K. Woolard (eds.), Language Ideologies. Special Issue of Pragmatics,235–249.