oa An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory

References

1. Akmajian, A. , Demers, R. A. , Harnish, R. M.
   (1980) Overcoming the inadequacies in the ‘message model’ of linguistic communication. Communication & Cognition13: 317–336.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allen, Greg , Buxton, Richard B. , Wong, Eric C. , Courchesne, Eric
   (1997) Attentional activation of the cerebellum independent of motor involvement. Science275: 1940–1943. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5308.1940
   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5308.1940 [Google Scholar]
3. Althusser, Louis
   (1971) Lenin and philosophy and other essays ( B. Brewster , trans.). New York: Monthly Review Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Anderson, John R.
   (1985) Cognitive psychology and its implications, 2nd ed. New York: W. H. Freeman.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Anscombe, G. E. M.
   (1957) Intention. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Arndt, Horst , Janney, Richard W.
   (1987) Intergrammar: Toward a integrative model of verbal, prosodic, and kinesic choices in speech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110872910
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872910 [Google Scholar]
7. Arundale, Robert B.
   (1991) Studies in the way of words: Grice’s new directions in conceptualizing meaning in conversational interaction. Paper presented atthe meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Arundale, Robert B.
   (1993) Culture specific assumptions and the concept of face: A proposal toward a cultural universal for studying face management in using language. Paper presented atthe meeting of the International Pragmatics Association, Kobe, Japan.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Arundale, Robert B.
   (1997) Re-analyzing Grice’s maxims and cooperative principle from a conversational perspective. Paper presented atthe meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Arundale, Robert B.
    (1998) An outline of Face Constituting Theory: An alternative to politeness theory grounded in an alternative ideology of communication. Paper presented atthe meeting of the International Pragmatics Association, Reims, France.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bavelas, Janet Beavin
    (1991) Some problems with linking goals to discourse. In K. Tracy (ed.), Understanding face-to-face interaction: Issues linking goals and discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 119–130.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Billig, M. , Condor, S. , Edwards, D. , Gane, M. , Middleton, D. , Radley, A.
    (1988) Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bilmes, Jack
    (1986) Discourse and behavior. New York: Plenum. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4899‑2040‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2040-9 [Google Scholar]
14. Brown, Penelope
    (1995) Politeness strategies and the attribution of intention: The case of Tzeltal irony. In E. N. Goody (ed.), Social intelligence and interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 153–174. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621710.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621710.010 [Google Scholar]
15. Brown, Penelope , Levinson, Stephen C.
    (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Page numbers in the 1987 edition can be obtained by subtracting five from page numbers 60–289 of the 1978 edition.)
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cartier, Francis A.
    (1963) Three misconceptions of communication. ETC.: A Review of General Semantics20: 135–145.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Chen, Victoria
    (1990/1991) Mien tze at the Chinese dinner table: A study of the interactional accomplishment of face. Research on Language and Social Interaction24: 109–140. doi: 10.1080/08351819009389334
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351819009389334 [Google Scholar]
18. Clark, Herbert H.
    (1996) Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
19. Clark, Herbert H. , Clark, Eve V.
    (1977) Psychology & language. New York: Harcourt Brace Javonovich.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ford, Cecilia E. , Fox, Barbara A. , Thompson, Sandra A.
    (1996) Practices in the construction of turns: The “TCU” revisited. Pragmatics6: 427–454.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fraser, Bruce
    (1990) Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics: 14, 219–236. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90081‑N
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N [Google Scholar]
22. Good, David A.
    (1989) The viability of conversational grammars. In M. M. Taylor , F. Neel & D. G. Bouwhuis (eds.), The structure of multimodal dialogue. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 135–144.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Good, David A.
    (1990) Repair and cooperation in conversation. In P. Luff , N. Gilbert , & D. Frolich (eds.), Computers and communication. London: Academic Press, 133–149.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Goodwin, Charles
    (1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Goodwin, Charles , Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
    (1987) Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessment. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics1: 1–54.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Grice, H. Paul
    (1989) Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Harris, Roy
    (1996) The language connection: Philosophy and linguistics. Bristol, UK: Thoemmes Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Heritage, John
    (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodolgy. Cambridge: UK: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ide, Sachiko
    (1989) Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistics politeness. Multilingua8: 233–248.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Jacoby, Sally , Ochs, Elinor
    (1995) Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction28: 171–183. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1 [Google Scholar]
31. Jary, Mark
    (1998) Relevance theory and the communication of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics30: 1–19. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)80005‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)80005-2 [Google Scholar]
32. Kincaid, D. Lawrence
    (1987) The convergence theory of communication, self organization, and cultural evolution. In D. L. Kincaid (ed.), Communication theory: Eastern and western perspectives. New York: Academic Press, 209–221.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Krippendorff, Klaus
    (1970) On generating data in communication research. Journal of Communication20: 241–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1970.tb00883.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00883.x [Google Scholar]
34. Krippendorff, Klaus
    (1975) Some principles of information storage and retrieval in society. General Systems20: 15–35.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Krippendorff, Klaus
    (1984) An epistemological foundation for communication. Journal of Communication34(3): 21–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1984.tb02171.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02171.x [Google Scholar]
36. Krippendorff, Klaus
    (1989) On the ethics of constructing communication. In B. Dervin , L. Grossberg , B. J. O’Keefe , & E. Wartella (eds.), Rethinking communication, Vol. 1, Paradigm issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 66–96.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Krippendorff, Klaus
    (1993) Major metaphors of communication and some constructivist reflections on their use. Cybernetics & Human Knowing2: 3–25.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Krippendorff, Klaus
    (1994) A recursive theory of communication. In D. Crowley & D. Mitchell (eds.), Communication theory today. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 78–104.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Krippendorff, Klaus
    (1997) Review of J.R. Searle, The construction of social reality. Communication Theory7: 81–84.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lannamann, John W.
    (1994) The problem with disempowering ideology. In S. A. Deetz (eds.), o mmunication yearbook 17. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 136–147.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Lerner, Gene H.
    (1996) Finding “face” in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly59: 303–321. doi: 10.2307/2787073
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2787073 [Google Scholar]
42. Levinson, Stephen C.
    (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Levinson, Stephen C.
    (1995) Interactional biases in human thinking. In E. Goody (ed.), Social intelligence and interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 221–260. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621710.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621710.014 [Google Scholar]
44. Levinson, Stephen C.
    (forthcoming) Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Linell, Per
    (1982) The written language bias in linguistics. Linkoping, Sweden: Dept. of Communication Studies, University of Linkoping.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Neisser, Ulric
    (1976) Cognition and reality: Principles and limitations of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Ochs, Elinor
    (1993) Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. search on Language and Social Interaction26: 287–306. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3 [Google Scholar]
48. Pearce, W. Barnett , Cronen, Vernon E.
    (1980) Communication, action and meaning: The creation of social realities. New York: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Reddy, Michael J.
    (1979) The conduit metaphor-A case study in frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 284–324.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Sacks, Harvey
    (1992) Lectures on conversation: Volume II. Edited by Gail Jefferson , with introductions by Emanuel A. Schegloff . Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Sacks, Harvey , Schegloff, Emanuel A , Jefferson, Gail
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of the turn-taking for conversation. Language50: 696–735. doi: 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
52. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    (1981) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 71–93.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    (1984a) On some gestures’ relation to talk. In J. Max Atkinson & John C. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 266–298.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    (1984b) On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. Max Atkinson & John C. Heritage , eds., Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 28–52.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    (1987) Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly50: 101–114. doi: 10.2307/2786745
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786745 [Google Scholar]
56. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    (1988a) Discourse as an interactional achievement II: An exercise in conversation analysis. In D. Tannen (ed.), Linguistics in context. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 135–158.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    (1988b) Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation. Journal of Pragmatics12: 55–62. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90019‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90019-7 [Google Scholar]
58. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    (1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology97: 1295–1345. doi: 10.1086/229903
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 [Google Scholar]
59. Shi-Xu
    (1994) Ideology: Strategies of reason and function of control in accounts of the non-western other. Journal of Pragmatics21: 645–669. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90102‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90102-3 [Google Scholar]
60. Sperber, Dan , Wilson, Deirdre
    (1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Stewart, John R.
    (1995) Language as articulate contact: Toward a post-semiotic philosophy of communication. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Suchman, Lucy A.
    (1987) Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Volosinov, V. N.
    (1973) Marxism and the philosophy of language ( L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik , trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Watts, Richard J. , Ide, Sachiko. , Ehlich, Konrad
    (eds.) (1992) Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory, and practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Watzlawick, Paul , Beavin, Janet H. , Jackson, Don
    (1967) Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Werner, Carol M. , Baxter, Leslie A.
    (1994) Temporal qualities of relationships: Organismic, transactional, and dialectical views. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 323–379.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Wilson, Thomas P. , Wiemann, John M. , Zimmerman, Don H.
    (1984) Models of turn taking in conversational interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology3: 159–183. doi: 10.1177/0261927X8400300301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8400300301 [Google Scholar]