Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238


This paper explores some pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic aspects of the Akan (Ghana, West Africa) native court judicial discourse. It is argued that court officials and litigants use specific content and functional words, idioms and other implicit expressions, as well as phonetic resources like mezzoforte and pianissimo loudness to express power, politeness and a range of attitudes and relationships such as distancing, anger, closeness, and politeness phenomena. Finally, the paper demonstrates that some judicial communication strategies employed by the interactional participants to indicate power in the native courts, may also be found in ordinary Akan conversation.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adelswärd, Viveka , Karin Aronsson , and Linda Jönsson
    (1987) The unequal distribution of interactional space: Dominance and control in courtroom interaction. Text7.4: 313–346.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman
    (1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. American anthropologist4.6: 24–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson
    (1978) Universals in language use: Politeness phenomena. In Esther Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.256–311.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bresnahan, Mary I.
    (1991) When a response is not an answer: Understanding conflict in non-native legal testimony. Multilingua. 10.3.: 275–293. doi: 10.1515/mult.1991.10.3.275
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1991.10.3.275 [Google Scholar]
  6. de Kadt, Elizabeth
    (1998) The concept of face and its applicability to the Zulu language. Journal of pragmatics29: 173–191. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)00021‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00021-0 [Google Scholar]
  7. Goffman, Erving
    (1967) Interaction ritual. New York: Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Goffman, Ervin
    (1972) On face work: On analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In J. Laver and S. Hutcheson (eds.), Communication in face to face interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp.319–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldman, L.R.
    (1986) A case of ‘questions ‘ and a question of ‘case ‘. Text. 6.4: 349–392.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Harris, Sandra
    (1995) Pragmatics and power. Journal of pragmatics23.2: 117–135. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00008‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00008-3 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hutchby, Ian
    (1996) Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show. Discourse and society7.4: 481–497. doi: 10.1177/0957926596007004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926596007004003 [Google Scholar]
  12. Keating, Elizabeth
    (1997) Honorific possession: Power and language in Pohnpei, Micronesia. Language in Society26.2: 247–268. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500020923
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500020923 [Google Scholar]
  13. Labov, William & D. Fanshel
    (1977) Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lakoff, Robin Tolmach
    (1989) The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua8.2/3: 101–129. doi: 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.101
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.101 [Google Scholar]
  15. Matsumoto, Yoshiko
    (1988) Re-examination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of pragmatics12.4: 403–426. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90003‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90003-3 [Google Scholar]
  16. (1989) Politeness and conversational universals: Observations from Japan. Multilingua8: 207–221. doi: 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.207
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.207 [Google Scholar]
  17. Mufwene, Salikoko S.
    (1988) The pragmatics of kinship terms in Kituba. Multilingua7.4: 441–453. doi: 10.1515/mult.1988.7.4.441
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1988.7.4.441 [Google Scholar]
  18. Nwoye, Onuigbo
    (1992) Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variation of the notion of face. Journal of pragmatics18: 309–328. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90092‑P
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90092-P [Google Scholar]
  19. Obeng, Samuel Gyasi
    (1996) The proverb as a mitigating and politeness strategy in Akan discourse. Anthropological linguistics. 38.4: 521–549.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (1997) Communication strategies: Persuasion and politeness in Akan judicial discourse. Text17.1: 25–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (1998) Prosody in Judicial discourse: Phonetic detail of disagreement tokens. Sociolinguistics Circle Meeting. Indiana University, Bloomington, November 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1999) Apologies in Akan Discourse. Journal of pragmatics31.5: 709–734. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00089‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00089-7 [Google Scholar]
  23. (in press)Leading litigants into speaking the unspeakable: A linguistic analysis of cross-examination strategies in Akan traditional courts. In Christina Jones (ed.) The impact of court administrators in Africa on judicial proceedings.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Obeng, Samuel Gyasi and Beverly Stoeltje
    (in preparation)Disagreement in Akan dispute settlements. Indiana University, Bloomington.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Oyetade, Solomon Oluwole
    (1995) A sociolinguistic analysis of address forms in YorubaLanguage in society24.4: 515–535. doi: 10.1017/S004740450001900X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001900X [Google Scholar]
  26. Pearson, Bethy
    (1988) Power and politeness in conversation: Encoding of face-threatening acts at church business meetings. Anthropological linguistics30.1: 68–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Stewart, John
    (1989) Kwa languages. In John Bendor-Samuel (ed.), The Niger-Congo languages. Summer Institute of Linguistics: Lanham, MD.University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Stoeltje, Beverly
    (1999) Performing litigation at the queen mother’s court. Mimeograph.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Thomas, Jenny A.
    (1985) The language of power: Towards a dynamic pragmatics. Journal of pragmatics9: 765–783. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(85)90003‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90003-7 [Google Scholar]
  30. Van Dijk, T.
    (1998) On the analysis of parliamentary debates on immigration. Working paper for the project Racism at the top. Unpublished Manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Wetzel, Patricia J.
    (1993) The language of vertical relationships and linguistic analysis. Multilingua12.4: 387–406. doi: 10.1515/mult.1993.12.4.387
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1993.12.4.387 [Google Scholar]
  32. Wierzbicka, Anna
    (1985) Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts. Journal of pragmatics9: 145–78. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(85)90023‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90023-2 [Google Scholar]
  33. Wood Linda A. and Rolf O. Kroger
    (1991) Politeness and forms of address. Journal of language and social psychology10.3: 145–168. doi: 10.1177/0261927X91103001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X91103001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Yankah, Kwesi
    (1991) Oratory in Akan society. Discourse and society2: 47–64. doi: 10.1177/0957926591002001003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926591002001003 [Google Scholar]
  35. (1995) Speaking for the chief. ]kyeame and the politics of Akan royal oratory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error