Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adams, Karen L.
    (1992) Accruing power on debate floors. In K. Hall , M. Bucholtz & B. Moonwomon (eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, University of California, pp.1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (1995) “Time’s up.” and “It’s not your turn.”: Enforcing and obeying limits in televised political debates. Paper presented atthe conference on Political Linguistics, Antwerp, December 7–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (1999) Creating ‘to the contrary’ selves for the television audience. Language Sciences21: 303–311. (Special issue, N. Love , (ed.) C. Basham , S. Fiskdal & P. Rounds (guest eds.), The notion of person.) doi: 10.1016/S0388‑0001(98)00030‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(98)00030-8 [Google Scholar]
  4. Adams, Karen L. and Anne Winter
    (1997) Gang graffiti as a discourse genre. Journal of Sociolinguistics1.3: 337–359. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00020
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00020 [Google Scholar]
  5. (forthcoming) Group and individual identity in gang graffiti. In S. Coffey , S. Graham & R. Hoopes (eds.) Discourse as mosaic: Linguistic re/production of identities & ideologies. Georgetown University.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Agha, Asif
    (1997) Tropic aggression in the Clinton-Dole presidential debate. Pragmatics7.4: 461–497. (Special issue, C. Briggs (ed.), Conflict and violence in pragmatic research.)
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Arizona
    (1984) Gubernatorial Debate (1984)Transcript.
  8. Blume, R.
    (1985) Graffiti. In T. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse and literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.137–148. doi: 10.1075/ct.3.09blu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ct.3.09blu [Google Scholar]
  9. Brenneis, Donald
    (1988) Language and disputing. Annual Review of Anthropology17: 221–217. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.17.100188.001253
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.17.100188.001253 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brenneis, Donald and Laura Lien
    (1977) “You fruithead:” A sociolinguistic approach to children’s disputes. In S. Ervin-Tripp & C. Mitchell-Kernan (eds.), Child discourse. New York: Academic Press, pp.49–65. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑241950‑8.50009‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-241950-8.50009-5 [Google Scholar]
  11. Briggs, Charles
    (ed.) (1997a) Conflict and violence in pragmatic research. Pragmatics7.4 (Special Issue).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1997b) Introduction: From the ideal, the ordinary and the orderly to conflict and violence in pragmatic research. Pragmatics7.4: 451–460. (Special issue, C. Briggs (ed.), Conflict and violence in pragmatic research.)
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cardona, Samuel Don
    (1993) Photographs. Chicano Research Collection, Hayden Library, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. MP SPC287.1-188.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fairclough, Norman
    (1992) Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goffman, Erving
    (1974) Frame analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
    (1990) He-Said-She-Said. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Grimshaw, Allen D.
    (ed.) (1990) Introduction. InConflict Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Haviland, John B.
    (1997) Shouts, shrieks, and shots: Unruly political conversations in indigenous Chiapas. In C. Briggs (ed.), Conflict and violence in pragmatic research. Pragmatics7.4: 547–573. (Special Issue)
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jacoby, Sally and Elinor Ochs
    (1995) Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction28.3: 171–183. (Special Issue: Co-construction.) doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1 [Google Scholar]
  20. Levinson, Stephen C.
    (1992) Activity types and language. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at Work. (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 8). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.66–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Louisiana
    (1996) Primary Senate Debate. (1996) Transcript.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Nebraska
    (1990) Gubernatorial Debate. (1990) Transcript.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ochs, Elinor
    (1990) Indexicality and socialization. In G. Herdt , R. Shweder , and J. Stigler (eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.287–308. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173728.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173728.009 [Google Scholar]
  24. (1992) Indexing gender. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin , (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.335–358.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Potter, Jonathan and Margaret Wetherell
    (1987) Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Silverstein, Michael
    (1985) Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage and ideology. In E. Mertz , and R. Palmentiers (eds.), Semiotic Mediation, pp.219–259. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑491280‑9.50016‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-491280-9.50016-9 [Google Scholar]
  27. Tannen, Deborah
    (1998) The Argument Culture: Moving from Debate to Dialogue. New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. To The Contrary
    “” (1993a) January 21, 1993 Transcript, #143. Owings Mills, MD.: Maryland Public Television.
  29. “ To The Contrary ” (1993b) January 28, 1993 Transcript, #144. Owings Mills, MD.: Maryland Public Television.
  30. “ To The Contrary ” (1998) October17, www.pbs.org./ttc/.
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error