Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Ajello, Roberto
    (1995) La focalizzazione in Somalo. In R. Ajello & S. Sani (eds.), Scritti linguistici et filologici in onore di Tristano Bolelli. Pisa: Pacini Editore, pp.1–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ameka, Felix
    (1992) Focus constructions in Ewe and Akan: A comparative perspective. In C. Collins & V. Manfredi (eds.), Proceedings of the Kwa comparative syntax workshop, MIT. (= MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 17). Cambridge (Mass.): Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp.1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bearth, Thomas
    (1986) Focalisation et antifocus. Tranel 11 (= Actes du 2ème Colloque régional de linguistique, Neuchatel2–3oct. 1986), pp.21–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (1992) Constitutent structure, natural focus hierarchy and focus types in Toura. Folia linguistica26/1-2: 75–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (1995) Sein und Haben. Kuwa na kutokuwa. In G. Miehe et al. (eds.), Handbuch des Swahili, eh. 13. Köln: Rüdiger Koppe, pp.207–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1997) Inferential and counter-inferential markers in Swahili dialogue. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 51 (= Swahili Forum IV), pp.1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1998a) Focus and Implicature. In S. Cmejrovâ , J. Hoffmannovâ & J. Svëtlâ (eds.), Dialogue Analysis VI. (+ Proceedings of the 6th Conference, Prague 1996.)Tübingen: Niemeyer. (+ Beiträge zur Dialogforschung, Band 16.), pp.395–405.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1998b) Space metaphor and global contrastive focus in Tura. In Petr Zima & Vladimir Tax (eds.), Language and location in space and time. Munich/Newcastle: LINCOM Europa, pp.11–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (1998c) Tonalité, déclinaison tonale et structuration du discours - un point de vue comparatif. In G. Quiroz , I. Berthoud , E. Thommen & Ch. Vogel (éds.), Les unités discursives dans l’analyse sémiotique (= TAUSCH vol. 12), Berne: Peter Lang, pp.73–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1998d) Procédés de cohésion dans le discours. Faits de Langues 11–12 (= Les langues d’Afrique subsaharienne, éd. S. Platiel & R. Kaboré ), pp.145–159. doi: 10.3406/flang.1998.1207
    https://doi.org/10.3406/flang.1998.1207 [Google Scholar]
  11. Berg, Jonathan
    (1991) The relevant relevance. Journal of Pragmatics16:411-425. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(91)90134‑J
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90134-J [Google Scholar]
  12. Biber, Douglas
    (1984) Pragmatic roles in Central Somali narrative discourse. Studies in African Linguistics15: 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Boadi, Lawrence
    (1974) Focus-marking in Akan. Linguistics140: 5–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Culioli, Antoine
    (1995) Cognition and representation in linguistic theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.112
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.112 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dahle 2
    (1989) Interview with M. Gora. Zanzibar. Helsinki Corpus of Swahili. (Compiler: Arvi Hurskainen).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Declerck, Renaat
    (1992) The inferential it is f/zaf-construction and its congeners. Lingua87: 203–230. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(92)90008‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(92)90008-7 [Google Scholar]
  17. Delahunty, Gerald P.
    (1990) Inferentials. The story of a forgotten evidential. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics15: 1–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (1995) The inferential construction. Pragmatics5.3: 341–364.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1997)  ‘Oh, it’s I’m not pretty enough’ Expletive structure and relevance . In A. Ahlgvist & V. Caprovâ (eds.), Dan Do Oide: Essays in Memory of Conn R.O. Cléinigh 1927–1995. Dublin: ITÉ,pp. 115–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dik, Simon
    (1989) The theory of functional grammar. Part I: The structure of the clause. (— Functional Grammar Series 9). Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dik, S. , M.E. Hoffmann , J.R. de Jong , S.I. Djiang , H. Stroomer and L. de Vries
    (1981) On the typology of focus phenomenon. In T. Hoekstra , H. van der Hulst & M. Moortgat (eds.), Perspectives on Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris, pp.41–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Firbas, J.
    (1974) Some aspects of the Czechoslovak approach to functional sentence perspective. In F. Danes (ed.), Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. The Hague: Mouton, pp.11–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Givón, Talmy
    (1990) Syntax. A functional-typological introduction vol.11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1017/s0022226700010434
    https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700010434 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gorayska, Barbara & Roger Lindsay
    (1993) The roots of relevance. Journal of Pragmatics19: 301–323. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90091‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90091-3 [Google Scholar]
  25. Halliday, Michael A.K.
    (1994) An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Heine, Bernd and Mechthild Reh
    (1983) Diachronie observations on compleltive focus marking in some African languages. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika5: 7–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jackendoff, Ray
    (1972) Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge (Mass.): Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Koranteng, E. Owusu
    (1991 [1974]) Guasohantan. Accra: Bureau of Ghanaian Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuno, Susumo
    (1973) The structure of the Japanese language (= Current Studies in Linguistics 3). Cambridge (Ma.): Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lambrecht, Knud
    (1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. London: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lecarme, Jacqueline
    (1991) Focus and somali: Syntaxe et interprétation. Linguistique africaine7: 33–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lord, Carol
    (1973) Serial verbs in transition. Studies in African linguistics4/3: 269–296.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Moeschler, J. and A. Reboul
    (1994) Dictionnaire encyclopédique de pragmatique. Paris: Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mous, Maarten
    (1997) The position of the object in Tunen. In Rose-Marie Déchaine & Victor Manfredi (eds.), Object positions in Benue-Kwa, pp.123–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Perrot, Jean
    (1974) Message et apport d’information: À la recherche des structures. Langue française21: 122–135. doi: 10.3406/lfr.1974.5669
    https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1974.5669 [Google Scholar]
  36. Robert, Stéphane
    (1993) Structure et sémantique de la focalisation. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 88/fesc.l: 25–47. doi: 10.2143/BSL.88.1.2013041
    https://doi.org/10.2143/BSL.88.1.2013041 [Google Scholar]
  37. Saah, Kofi K.
    (1988) Wh-questions in Akan. Journal of West African Languages18.1: 17–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
    (1987) The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics25: 511–580. doi: 10.1515/ling.1987.25.3.511
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.3.511 [Google Scholar]
  39. (1995) “Theticity” and VS order: A case study. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 48–1/2: 3–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sempé, J.-J. and R. Goscinny
    (1964) Joachim a des ennuis. Une aventure du petit Nicolas. Paris: Denoël. (= Collection foHo junior.)
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson
    (1995 [1986]) Relevance. Communication and cognition. 2nd edition. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Yelbert, Jonathan E.
    (1996) Etude des énoncés comportant se dans la langue akan: Invariance et variations. Thèse, Université de Paris X-Nenterre. (Duplicated).
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error