1887
Volume 9, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1018-2101
  • E-ISSN: 2406-4238

Abstract

This paper investigates how speakers of English can use the prosodic design of utterances to identity parts of these utterances as instances of reported speech. We will show that prosodic changes can function like quotation marks in written texts by clearly delimiting left and right hand boundaries of the reported sequence. In the majority of cases, however, prosodic changes do not coincide with the boundaries of reported speech but occur nearby, functioning like a 'frame' for the interpretation of a sequence as reported or even only as a 'flag' attracting attention and inviting the listener to actively (re-)construct the corresponding boundaries. Our data analysis also provides evidence for the use of prosodic designs to typify a figure in different roles, which - due to their unique 'prosodic design' can be presented without any verbalized projection of upcoming reported speech, once they have been introduced. This is due to the 'referent-tracking' nature of some prosodic designs of reported utterances.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/prag.9.4.03kle
1999-01-01
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auer, P. , E. Couper-Kuhlen & F. Mueller
    (in print)Language in time. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Auer, P. & A. Luzio
    (eds.) (1992) The contextualization of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruenner, G.
    (1991) Redewiedergabe in Gesprächen. Deutsche Sprache, 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark, H. & R. Gerrig
    (1990) Quotations and demonstrations. Language66: 764–805. doi: 10.2307/414729
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
  5. Couper-Kuhlen, E.
    (1993) English speech rhythm: Form and function in everyday verbal interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.25
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.25 [Google Scholar]
  6. (1998) Coherent voicing: On prosody in conversational reported speech. InLiSt. Interaction and Linguistic Structures1: 1–26. Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cruttenden, A.
    (1986) Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Goffman, E.
    (1981) Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Günthner, S.
    (1997a) The contextualization of affect in reported dialogues. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (eds.), The Language of emotions. Conceptualization, expression, and theoretical foundation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.247–276. doi: 10.1075/z.85.19gun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.85.19gun [Google Scholar]
  10. (1997b) Direkte und indirekte Rede in Alltagsgesprächen - zur Interaktion von Syntax und Prosodie in der Redewiedergabe. In P. Schlobinski (ed.), Zur Syntax des gesprochenen Deutsch. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1997c) Stilisierungsverfahren in der Redewiedergabe - die ‘Überlagerung von Stimmen’ als Mittel der moralischen Verurteilung in Vorwurfsrekonstruktionen. In B. Sandig & M. Selting (eds.), Sprech-und Gesprächsstile. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gumperz, J.
    (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hanks, W.E.
    (1990) Referential practice. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Holt, E.
    (1996) Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on language and social interaction29.3: 219–245. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2 [Google Scholar]
  15. Leech, G.N. & M.H. Short
    (1981) Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. London and New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mayes, P.
    (1990) Quotation in spoken English. Studies in Language12–2: 325–363.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Romaine, S. & D. Lange
    (1991) The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech66: 227–279. doi: 10.2307/455799
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455799 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ruehmann, M.
    (1999) Reported speech, ‘voicing’, and ‘pre-voicing’: Typification strategies in everyday conversation. M.A. thesis. Dept. of Linguistics, University of Konstanz.
  19. Selting, M. , P. Auer
    et al. (1998) Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem (GAT). Linguistische Berichte173:91-122.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Tannen, D.
    (1989) “Oh talking that is so sweet”: Constructing dialogue in conversation. InTalking voices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.98–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Yule, G.
    (1995) The paralinguistics of reference: Representation in reported discourse. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (eds.), Principle & practice in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.185–196.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jane Austen
    : Pride and prejudice. New York: Dell Publishing 1959.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.9.4.03kle
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error