Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Berk-Seligson, Susan
    2002 “The Miranda Warnings and Linguistic Coercion: The Role of Footing in the Interrogation of a Limited-English Speaking Murder Suspect”. InLanguage in the Legal Process, ed. byJanet Cotterill, 127–143. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230522770_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522770_8 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2011 “Negotiation and Communicative Accommodation in Bilingual Police Interrogations: A critical Interactional Sociolinguistic Perspective”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language207: 29–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Filipović, Luna
    2007 “Language as a Witness: Insights from Cognitive Linguistics”. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law14 (2): 245–267. 10.1558/ijsll.v14i2.245
    https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v14i2.245 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2013 “The role of Language in Legal Contexts: A Forensic Cross-linguistic Viewpoint”. InLaw and Language: Current Legal Issues (15), ed. byMichael Freeman and Fiona Smith, 328–343. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199673667.003.0167
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199673667.003.0167 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2017a “Applied Language Typology: Applying Typological Insights in Practice”. Languages in Contrast17(2): 255–278. 10.1075/lic.17.2.05fil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.17.2.05fil [Google Scholar]
  6. 2017b “Applying Language Typology: Practical Applications of Research on Typological Contrasts between Languages”. InMotion and Space across Languages. Theory and Applications, ed. byIraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, 399–418. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.59.16fil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.16fil [Google Scholar]
  7. Filipović, Luna, and Alberto Hijazo-Gascón
    2018 “Interpreting Meaning in Police Interviews: Applied Language Typology in a Forensic Linguistics Context”. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics VIAL15: 67–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Filipović, Luna and Suzanne Abad Vergara
    2018 “Juggling Investigation and Interpretation: The Problematic Dual Role of Police Officer-Interpreter”. Law and Language/ Linguagem e Direito5(1): 62–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 “Logic and Conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics. Vol 3: Speech Acts, ed. byPeter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 91–58. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Heydon, Georgina
    2005The Language of Police Interviews: A Critical Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230502932
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502932 [Google Scholar]
  11. Jaszczolt, Kasia
    2016Meaning in Linguistic Interaction: Semantics, Metasemantics, Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Linfoot-Ham, Kerry
    2006 “Conversational Maxims in Encounters with Law Enforcement Officers”. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law13(1): 23–54. 10.1558/sll.2006.13.1.23
    https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.2006.13.1.23 [Google Scholar]
  13. Meissner, Christian A., Allison R. Redlich, Stephen W. Michael, Jacqueline R. Evans, Catherine Camilletti, Sujeeta Bhatt, and Sussan Brandon
    2014 “Accusatorial and Information-gathering Interrogation Methods and their Effects on True and False Confessions: A meta-analytic Review”. Journal of Experimental Criminology10: 459–486. 10.1007/s11292‑014‑9207‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9207-6 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error