1887
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Quotation and reflective interpretation of previous statements are common features in police interviews. Of particular importance is the uncovering of apparent contradictions between earlier and current responses in interviews of suspects. Conflicting statements can be used by officers as triggers to elicit new responses that explain inconsistencies. In linguistic pragmatics, such reflective commenting on utterances is categorised as metacommunication, i.e. ‘communication about communication’, which includes metarepresentation, i.e. second-order representation of another representation through some form of quotation. Such instances of metacommunication are key instances of negotiating the communicative interests of its chief participants, which in suspect interviews consist on the one hand in the interviewers’ purpose of establishing grounds for a potential criminal charge and, on the other hand, the interviewee’s interest in avoiding such a charge. This article analyses exemplary cases of metacommunication in multilingual police interviews from the perspective of quotation pragmatics. The results suggest that police interview training should pay special attention to this area in order to optimise cognitive results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.00014.mus
2019-05-28
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ainsworth, Janet
    2012 “The Meaning of Silence in the right to remain silent.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, ed. byPeter Tiersma and Lawrence Solan, 287–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arendholz, Jenny, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig
    (eds) 2015The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110427561
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110427561 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brendel, Elke, Markus Steinbach and Jörg Meibauer
    (eds.) 2011Understanding Quotation. Linguistic and Philosophical Analyses. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110240085
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240085 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bublitz, Wolfram
    2015 “Introducing Quoting as a Ubiquitous Meta-Communicative Act.” InThe Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, ed. byJenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 1–26. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110427561‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110427561-002 [Google Scholar]
  6. College of Policing
    College of Policing 2017Investigative Interviewing. https://www.app.college.police.uk/app-content/investigations/investigative-interviewing/ (accessed04/12/2017)
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cotterill, Janet
    2004 “‘Just One More Time …’: Aspects of Intertextuality in the Trials of O. J. Simpson.” InLanguage in the legal process, ed. byJanet Cotterill, 147–161. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2005 “You do not have to say anything…: Instructing the jury on the defendant’s right to silence in the English criminal justice system.” Multilingua: Special issue on Silence in Institutional and Intercultural Contexts24(1/2): 7–24. 10.1515/mult.24.1‑2.7
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.24.1-2.7 [Google Scholar]
  9. Coulthard, Malcolm
    1977An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2004 “Whose Voice Is It? Invented and Concealed Dialogue in Written Records of Verbal Evidence Produced by the Police.” InLanguage in the legal process, ed. byJanet Cotterill, 19–34. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dando, Coral, Rachel Wilcock and Rebecca Milne
    2009 “The Cognitive interview: novice police officers’ witness/victim interviewing practices.” Psychology, Crime and Law15(8): 679–696. 10.1080/10683160802203963
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802203963 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gibbons, John
    2003Forensic Linguistics: an introduction to language in the justice system. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. gov.uk 2017aPolice and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) codes of practice; updated25 October 2017; https://www.gov.uk/arrested-your-rights (accessed04/12/2017)
    [Google Scholar]
  14. [Google Scholar]
  15. Grice, Herbert Paul
    1989 “Logic and Conversation.” In: Herbert Paul Grice 1989 Studies in the Way of Words, 22–40. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hübler, Axel and Wolfram Bublitz
    2007 “Introducing metapragmatics in use.” InMetapragmatics in Use, ed. byWolfram Bublitz and Axel Hübler, 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.165.02hub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.165.02hub [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson, Alison J.
    2008 “Changing stories. Achieving a change of state in suspect and witness knowledge through evaluation in political interviews with suspects and witnesses.” Functions of Language15 (1): 84–114. 10.1075/fol.15.1.06joh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.15.1.06joh [Google Scholar]
  18. 2013 “Embedding police interviews in the prosecution case in the Shipman trial.” InLegal-Lay Communication. Textual Travels in the Law, ed. byC. Heffer, F. Rock, and J. Conley, 147–167. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746842.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746842.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson, Alison
    2014 “‘Dr Shipman told you that…’ The organising and synthesising power of quotation in judicial summing-up.” Language and Communication36 (1): 53–67. 10.1016/j.langcom.2013.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  20. Matoesian, Greg
    2000 “Intertextual authority in reported speech: Production media in the Kennedy Smith rape trial.” Journal of Pragmatics32: 879–914. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00080‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00080-6 [Google Scholar]
  21. Newbury, Philipp and Alison Johnson
    2006 “Suspects’ resistance to constraining and coercive questioning strategies in the police interview.” The International Journal of Speech Language and the Law13 (2): 213–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Oxburgh, Gavin E., Trond Myklebust and Tim Grant
    2010 “The question of question types in police interviews: A review of the literature from a psychological and linguistic perspective.” The International Journal of Speech Language and the Law17 (1): 45–66. 10.1558/ijsll.v17i1.45
    https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v17i1.45 [Google Scholar]
  23. Poggi, Francesca and Alessandro Capone
    (eds.) 2016Pragmatics and Law: Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (eds.) 2017Pragmatics and Law: Practical and Theoretical Perspectives. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑44601‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44601-1 [Google Scholar]
  25. Rock, Frances
    2012 “The caution in England and Wales.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, ed. byPeter Tiersma and Lawrence Solan, 313–325. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schiffrin, Deborah
    2001 “Discourse Markers: Language, Meaning and Context.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byDeborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heidi E. Hamilton, 55–75. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Scollon, Ronald, Suzanne Wong Scollon, and Rodney H. Jones
    2012Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. TACIT
    TACIT 2018Translation and Communication in Training. Norwich: University of East Anglia. whatworks.college.police.uk/Research/Research-Map/Pages/ResearchProject.aspx?projectid=326
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Vredeveldt, Annelies, Peter J. van Koppen and Pär Anders Granhag
    2014 “The Inconsistent Suspect: A systematic review of different Types of consistency in truth tellers and liars.” InInvestigative Interviewing, ed. byRay Bull, 183–208. New York: Springer Science. 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑9642‑7_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9642-7_10 [Google Scholar]
  30. Walsh, David and Ray Bull
    2012 “Examining rapport in investigative interviews with suspects: Does its building and maintenance work?” Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology27: 73–84. 10.1007/s11896‑011‑9087‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-011-9087-x [Google Scholar]
  31. 2015 “Interviewing suspects: examining the association between skills, questioning, evidence disclosure, and interview outcomes.” Psychology, Crime & Law21 (7): 661–680. 10.1080/1068316X.2015.1028544
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1028544 [Google Scholar]
  32. Wilson, Deirdre
    2000 “Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication.” InMetaprepresentations: a multidisciplinary perspective, ed. byDan Sperber, 411–448. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.00014.mus
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): metacommunication , metarepresentation , police interview , pragmatics and quotation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error