“Would it be fair to say that you actively sought out material?”

References

1. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper
   1989 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics, Speech Acts, Politeness. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
3. Caffi, Claudia
   2007 Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cederborg, Ann-Christin, Yael Orbach, Kathleen J. Sternberg and Michael Lamb
   2000 “Investigative Interviews of Child Witnesses in Sweden”. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24 (10): 1355–1361. 10.1016/S0145‑2134(00)00183‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00183-6 [Google Scholar]
5. College of Policing
   College of Policing. www.college.police.uk
6. Culpeper, Jonathan
   2011 Impoliteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
7. Fisher, Ronald, Ralph E. Geiselman and D. S. Raymond
   1987 “Critical Analysis of Police Interview Techniques”. Journal of Police Science and Administration15 (3): 177–185.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fraser, Bruce
   1975 “Hedged Performatives”. InSyntax and Semantics (Vol. 3.): Speech Acts, ed. byPeter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 187–210. New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fraser, Bruce
   2010 “Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging”. New Approaches to Hedging, ed. byGunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch and Stefan Schneider, 15–34. Bingley, UK: Emerald. 10.1163/9789004253247_003
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253247_003 [Google Scholar]
10. Griffiths, Andy, and Rebecca Milne
    2006 “Will It All End in Tiers? Police Interviews with Suspects in Britain”, Investigative Interviewing: Rights, Research, Regulation, ed. byTom Williamson, 167–189. New York: Willan.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Holmes, Janet
    1984 “Modifying Illocutionary Force.” Journal of Pragmatics8:345–365. 10.1016/0378‑2166(84)90028‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90028-6 [Google Scholar]
12. Hübler, Axel
    1983 Understatements and Hedges in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.iv.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.iv.6 [Google Scholar]
13. Korkman, Julia, Pekka Santtila, and N. Kenneth Sandnabba
    2006 “Dynamics of Verbal Interaction between Interviewer and Child in Interviews with Alleged Victims of Child Sexual Abuse”. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology47 (2): 109–119. 10.1111/j.1467‑9450.2006.00498.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00498.x [Google Scholar]
14. Lakoff, Robin
    1973 “Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts.” Journal of Philosophical Logic2:458–508. 10.1007/BF00262952
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262952 [Google Scholar]
15. Lamb, Michael, Irit Hershkowitz, Kathleen J. Sternberg, Barbara Boat, and Mark Everson
    1997 “Investigative Interviews of Alleged Sexual Abuse Victims with and without Anatomic Dolls”. Child Abuse & Neglect. 20(12): 1251–9. 10.1016/S0145‑2134(96)00121‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(96)00121-4 [Google Scholar]
16. Ministry of Justice
    Ministry of Justice 2011 “Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses, and Guidance on Using Special Measures.” https://www.cps.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/legal_guidance/best_evidence_in_criminal_proceedings.pdf
17. Morris, Pauline, Steven A. Richardson, Barbara Snell Dohrenwend, and David Klein
    1965 Interviewing: Its Forms and Functions. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Oxburgh, Gavin E., Trond Myklebust, Tim Grant, and Christian Meissner
    2010 “Interview and Interrogation Methods and Their Effects on Investigative Outcomes.” International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law17 (1):45–66.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Phillips, Emma, Gavin Oxburgh, Amanda Gavin, and Trond Myklebust
    2012 “Investigative Interviews with Victims of Child Sexual Abuse: The Relationship between Question Type and Investigation Relevant Information.” Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27(1):45–54. 10.1007/s11896‑011‑9093‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-011-9093-z [Google Scholar]
20. Schneider, Stefan
    2010 “Mitigation.” InInterpersonal Pragmatics, edited byMiriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, 253–269. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Searle, John R.
    1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society5 (1):1–23. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
22. Searle, John R.
    1979 Expression and Meaning : Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
23. Thaler, Verena
    2012 “Mitigation as Modification of Illocutionary Force.” Journal of Pragmatics44 (6–7): 907–19. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.001 [Google Scholar]