1887
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Both research and police guidelines acknowledge the value of rapport-building in police interview with suspects (ISs) and provide some insight into how ‘rapport’ may be defined and built in this context. Rapport is, however, difficult to operationalise and assess in practice, other than for the routine legal clarification offered to suspects at the beginning of the interview. This paper takes an original discourse-pragmatic and ethnographic approach to investigating the forms that rapport takes in a sample of authentic ISs, with particular reference to two dimensions, empathy and face. The article discusses the value and suitability of the identified empathic and ‘face’-relevant expressions with respect to current interview aims and practice. The discussion highlights the underlying bi-functionality of rapport in ISs, demonstrating how the two functions may be reconciled in police interview training and practice.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.00017.pou
2019-05-28
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abbe, Alison and Susan E. Brandon
    2013 “The Role of Rapport in Investigative Interviewing: A Review.” Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling10: 237–249. 10.1002/jip.1386
    https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1386 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alison, Laurence, Emily Alison, Geraldine Noone, Stamatis Elntib, Sara Waring, and Paul Christiansen
    2013 “Why Tough Tactics Fail and Rapport Gets Results: Observing Rapport-based Interpersonal Techniques (ORBIT) to Generate Useful Information from Terrorists.” Psychology, Public Policy and Law19: 411–431. 10.1037/a0034564
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034564 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arundale, Robert B.
    2010 “Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework and Interactional Achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics42: 2078–2105. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baron-Cohen, Simon
    2011Zero Degrees of Empathy: A New Theory of Human Cruelty and Kindness. Milton Keynes: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barrett-Lennard, G. T.
    1981 “The Empathy Cycle: Refinement of a Nuclear Concept.” Journal of Counseling Psychology26(2): 91–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clarke, Colin and Rebecca J. Milne
    2001National Evaluation of the Peace Investigative Interviewing Course. Police Research Award Scheme Report No. PRAS/149. London: Home Office.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. College of Policing
    College of Policinghttps://www.app.college.police.uk (accessed2017).
  9. Dando, Coral, Rachel Wilcock, and Rebecca Milne
    2008 “The Cognitive Interview: Inexperienced Police Officers’ Perceptions of their Witness/Victim Interviewing Practices.” Legal and Criminological Psychology13(1): 59–70. doi:  10.1348/135532506X162498
    https://doi.org/10.1348/135532506X162498 [Google Scholar]
  10. Evans, Jacqueline R., Christina A. Meissner, Susan E. Brandon, Melissa B. Russano and Steve M. Kleinman
    2010 “Criminal versus HUMINT Interrogations: The Importance of Psychological Science to Improving Interrogative Practice”. Journal of Psychiatry and Law38:215–249. 10.1177/009318531003800110
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009318531003800110 [Google Scholar]
  11. Goffman, Ervin
    1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 1967Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Interaction. New York: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hojat, Mohammadreza
    2007Empathy in Patient Care: Antecedents, Development, Measurement and Outcomes. Philadelphia: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Holmberg, Ulf and Sven-Åke Christianson
    2002 “Murderers and Sexual Offenders’ Experiences of Police Interviews and Inclination to Admit or Deny Crimes.” Behavioral Sciences and the Law20: 31–45. 10.1002/bsl.470
    https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.470 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ministry of Justice
    Ministry of Justice 2011Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses and Using Special Measures. London: UK Government.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kebbell, Mark, Emily J. Hurren and Paul Mazerolle
    2006 “Sex Offenders’ Perceptions of how they were Interviewed”. Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, 4:67–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kelly, Christopher, Jeaneé C. Miller, Allison D. Redlich, and Steven M. Kleinman
    2013 “A Taxonomy of Interrogation Methods”. Psychology, Public Policy and Law19: 165–178. 10.1037/a0030310
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030310 [Google Scholar]
  18. Leary, Timothy F. and Hubert S. Coffey
    1954 “The Prediction of Interpersonal Behavior in Group Psychotherapy.” Group Psychotherapy7:7–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Limberg, Holger
    2008 “Threats in Conflict Talk: Impoliteness and Manipulation”. InImpoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. byDerek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 155–179. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Meissner, Christian A., Alison D. Redlich, Sujeeta Bhatt, and Susan Brandon
    2012Interview and Interrogation Methods and their Effects on True and False Confessions. www.cambellcollaboration.org. doi:  10.4073/csr.2012.13
    https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2012.13 [Google Scholar]
  21. Miller, William R. and Stephen Rollnick
    2002Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd Edition. New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Oxburgh, Gavin and James Ost
    2011 “The Use and Efficacy of Empathy in Police Interviews with Suspects of Sexual Offences.” Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling8: 178–188. 10.1002/jip.143
    https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.143 [Google Scholar]
  23. Oxburgh, Gavin, James Ost, Paul Morris, and Julie Cherryman
    2014 “The Impact of Question Type and Empathy on Police Interviews with Suspects of Homicide, Filicide and Child Sexual Abuse.” Psychiatry, Psychology and Law21(6): 903–917. 10.1080/13218719.2014.918078
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.918078 [Google Scholar]
  24. Pounds, Gabrina
    2011 “Empathy as ‘Appraisal’: A New Language-based Approach to the Exploration of Clinical Empathy.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice7(2). 139–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Shepherd, Eric
    1991 “Ethical Interviewing.” Policing7(1): 42–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Tickle-Degnen, Linda and Robert Rosenthal
    1990 “The Nature of Rapport and its Non-verbal Correlates.” Psychological Enquiry1(4): 285–293. 10.1207/s15327965pli0104_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0104_1 [Google Scholar]
  27. Vallano, Jonathan, Jacqueline R. Evans, Nadja Schreiber Compo, and Jenna M. Kieckhaefer
    2015 “Rapport-building during Witness and Suspect Interviews: A Survey of Law Enforcement.” Applied Cognitive Psychology29: 369–380. 10.1002/acp.3115
    https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3115 [Google Scholar]
  28. Walsh, David and Ray Bull
    2012 “Examining Rapport in Investigative Interviews with Suspects: Does its Building and Maintenance Work?” Police Criminal Psychology27: 73–84. 10.1007/s11896‑011‑9087‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-011-9087-x [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.00017.pou
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.00017.pou
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discourse pragmatics , empathy , face , police interviews , police officer training , rapport and suspects
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error