Alessandro Capone, The Pragmatics of Indirect Reports: Socio-philosophical Considerations

References

1. Attardo, Salvatore
   1999 “Irony as relevant inappropriateness”. Journal of Pragmatics32: 793–826. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00070‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00070-3 [Google Scholar]
2. Attardo, Salvatore, Jodi Eisterhold, Jennifer Hay & Isabella Poggi
   2003 “Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm”. Humor16(2): 243–260. 10.1515/humr.2003.012
   https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2003.012 [Google Scholar]
3. Bach, K.
   2000 “Quantification, Qualification and Context a Reply to Stanley and Szabó”. Mind and Language, 15(2 & 3), 262–283. 10.1111/1468‑0017.00131
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00131 [Google Scholar]
4. Bryant, Gregory A. & Jean E. Fox Tree
   2002 Recognizing verbal irony in spontaneous speech. Metaphor and symbol17(2) 99–117. 10.1207/S15327868MS1702_2
   https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1702_2 [Google Scholar]
5. Bryant, Gregory A. & Jean E. Fox Tree
   2005 “Is there an Ironic tone of voice?” Language and Speech48(3): 257–277. 10.1177/00238309050480030101
   https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309050480030101 [Google Scholar]
6. Camp, Elizabeth
   2012 “Sarcasm, pretense, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction”. Noûs, 46(4): 587–634. 10.1111/j.1468‑0068.2010.00822.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00822.x [Google Scholar]
7. Capone, Alessandro
   2005 “Pragmemes: A study with reference to English and Italian”. Journal of Pragmatics37 (9) 1355–1371. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.013 [Google Scholar]
8. Capone, Alessandro
   2008 “Belief reports and pragmatic intrusion: The case of null appositives”. Journal of Pragmatics40: 1019–1040. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.008
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.008 [Google Scholar]
9. Capone, Alessandro
   2010 “On the social practice of indirect reports: Further advances in the theory of pragmemes”. Journal of Pragmatics42: 377–391. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.013 [Google Scholar]
10. Cheang, Henry S. & Marc D. Pell
    2008 “The sound of sarcasm”. Speech Communication50: 366–381. 10.1016/j.specom.2007.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2007.11.003 [Google Scholar]
11. Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig
    1984 “On the pretense theory of irony”. Journal of Experimental Psychology113(1): 121–126. 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.1.121
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121 [Google Scholar]
12. Clark, Herbert H., &, Richard J. Gerrig
    1990 “Quotations as demonstrations”. Language66(4): 764. 10.2307/414729
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
13. Coulmas, Florian
    1986 Direct and indirect speech. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110871968
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871968 [Google Scholar]
14. Cummings, Louise
    2016 “Reported Speech: A clinical pragmatic perspective”. InAlessandro Capone, Ferenc Kiefer & Franco Lo Piparo (eds,). Indirect reports and pragmatics. Cham: Springer, 31–54. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑21395‑8_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21395-8_3 [Google Scholar]
15. Dascal, Marcelo
    2003 Interpretation and understanding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.120
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.120 [Google Scholar]
16. Douven, Igor
    2010 “The pragmatics of belief”. Journal of Pragmatics42(1): 35–47. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.025 [Google Scholar]
17. Douven, Igor
    2013 “Putting the pragmatics of belief to work”. InAlessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on pragmatics and Philosophy. Cham: Springer, 475–488. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑01011‑3_20
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01011-3_20 [Google Scholar]
18. Goffman, Erving
    1981 Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press. (Italian translationForme del parlare, Il Mulino, Bologna 1987).
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gonzalez-Fuente, Santiago, Pilar Prieto & Ira A. Noveck
    2016 “A fine-grained analysis of the acoustic cues involved in verbal irony recognition in French”. Speech Prosody185: 902–906. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016‑185
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-185 [Google Scholar]
20. Higginbotham, James
    2003 “Remembering, imagining, and the first-person”. InAlex Barber (ed.), Epistemology of language, 496–533Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Holt, Elizabeth
    2016 Indirect reported speech in interaction. InAlessandro Capone, Ferenc Kiefer & Franco Lo Piparo (eds,). Indirect reports and pragmatics. Cham: Springer, 167–188. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑21395‑8_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21395-8_9 [Google Scholar]
22. Holt, Elizabeth
    2017 Indirect reported speech in storytelling: its position, design, and uses. Research in Language & Social Interaction50 (2): 171–187. 10.1080/08351813.2017.1301302
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1301302 [Google Scholar]
23. Kecskes, Istvan
    2016 “Can intercultural pragmatics bring some new insight into pragmatic theories?InAlessandro Capone & Jacob L. Mey (eds). Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society. Cham: Springer, 43–69. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑12616‑6_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_3 [Google Scholar]
24. Labov, William & David Fanshel
    1977 Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1988 “Putting linguistics on a proper footing”. InPaul Drew & Anthony Wootton (eds.). Goffman: exploring the interaction order. Oxford: Polity Press. 161–227.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2000 Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
27. Macagno, Fabrizio & Alessandro Capone
    2016 “Interpretative disputes, explicatures, and argumentative reasoning”. Argumentation30(4): 399–422. 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9347‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9347-5 [Google Scholar]
28. Mey, Jacob L.
    2001 Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell. (Second edition)
    [Google Scholar]
29. Norrick, Neal
    2016 Indirect reports, quotation and narrative. InAlessandro Capone, Ferenc Kiefer & Franco Lo Piparo (eds.). Indirect reports and pragmatics. Dordrecht: Springer, 93–113. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑21395‑8_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21395-8_6 [Google Scholar]
30. Recanati, François
    2009 “De re’ and ‘de se”. Dialectica63 (3): 249–269. 10.1111/j.1746‑8361.2009.01194.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2009.01194.x [Google Scholar]
31. Richard, Mark
    2013 Context and the attitudes: meaning and context. Oxford: Oxford University press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557950.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557950.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
32. Seymour, Michel
    1994 “Indirect discourse and quotations”. Philosophical Studies74: 1–38. 10.1007/BF00989637
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989637 [Google Scholar]
33. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Spotorno, Nicola, Anne Cheylus, Jean-Baptiste Van Der Henst & Ira A. Noveck
    2013 “What’s behind a P600? Integration operations during irony processing”. Plos One8(6): e66839. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066839
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066839 [Google Scholar]
35. Wieland, Nellie
    2013 “Indirect reports and pragmatics”. InAlessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on pragmatics and Philosophy. Cham: Springer, 389–412. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑01011‑3_17
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01011-3_17 [Google Scholar]
36. Wittgenstein, Ludwig
    1952 Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Blackwell. (Italian translation Ricerche filosofiche. Torino: Einaudi 1958).
    [Google Scholar]
37. Woodland, Jennifer & Daniel Voyer
    2011 “Context and intonation in the perception of sarcasm”. Metaphor and Symbol26(3): 227–239. 10.1080/10926488.2011.583197
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2011.583197 [Google Scholar]
38. Zajaczkowska, Maria Katarzyna
    2017 Influence of voice intonation on understanding irony by Polish-speaking preschool children. Psychology of Language and Communication20(3): 278–291. 10.1515/plc‑2016‑0017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2016-0017 [Google Scholar]