Volume 12, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This article reviews Time in embodied interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources



Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Clark, Herbert H.
    1996Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  2. Clayman, Steven E.
    1989 “The production of punctuality: Social interaction, temporal organization, and social structure”. American Journal of Sociology95(3), 659–691. 10.1086/229329
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229329 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cowley, Stephen J.
    1998 “Of timing, turn-taking, and conversations”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research27(5), 541–571. 10.1023/A:1024948912805
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024948912805 [Google Scholar]
  4. Goodwin, Charles
    1980 “Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning”. Sociological Inquiry50(3–4), 272–302. 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00023.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00023.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Lerner, Gene H.
    1989 “Notes on overlap management in conversation: The case of delayed completion”. InStudies from the First GenerationbyGene H. Lerner (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 167–177. 10.1080/10570318909374298
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318909374298 [Google Scholar]
  6. Lofting, Hugh
    1988The Story of Doctor Dolittle. Penguin, UK. (Originally published 1920)
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, & Gail Jefferson
    1978 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation”. InStudies in the organization of conversational interactionbyJim Schenkein (ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 7–55. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50008‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50008-2 [Google Scholar]
  8. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1992 “Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation”. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345. 10.1086/229903
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error