1887
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Whilst many studies focus on human-to-media interactions, this paper turns to how a multimodal medium contributes to human-to-human interaction. By bringing together both radical embodied cognitive science ( Chemero 2009 ) and dialogism ( Linell 2009 ), the paper develops an anti-representationalist approach to the concept of social presence. We use an exploratory study of close friendships that maintain their interaction through the use of the mobile instant messaging service WhatsApp. In so doing, we describe texting as language-activity where people engage with each other by using resources from body, environment, and brain. Our work represents a major departure from previous studies of mobile interaction in adopting an embodied view of language and cognition. By so doing, we show how parties create anticipatory routines that enable them to ‘hear’ and ‘see’ their interlocutor. The paper’s main contribution is to draw attention to this kind of heightened social presence that we choose to call “co-imagining”.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ps.15067.fes
2018-06-28
2019-03-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aharony, Noa , and Tali Gazit
    2016 “The importance of the WhatsApp family group: an exploratory analysis.” Aslib Journal of Information Management68 (2): 174–192.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
    2008 “Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography.” [email protected] internet5.8.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biocca, Frank , Chad Harms , and Judee K. Burgoon
    2003 “Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria.” Presence12 (5): 456–480.10.1162/105474603322761270
    https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chemero, Anthony
    2009Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2016 “Sensorimotor empathy” Journal of Consciousness Studies23 (5–6): 138–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cowley, Stephen J.
    1994 “Conversational functions of rhythmical patterning: a behavioural perspective. ” Language and Communication14: 353–376.10.1016/0271‑5309(94)90026‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(94)90026-4 [Google Scholar]
  7. 1997 “Conversation, co-ordination and vertebrate communication” Semiotica115 (1): 27–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cowley, Stephen. J.
    (Ed.) 2011Distributed language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.34
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.34 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cowley, Stephen J.
    2014 “Linguistic embodiment and verbal constraints: human cognition and the scales of time.” Frontiers in Psychology5, 1085. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01085
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01085 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cowley, Stephen J. , and Matthew I. Harvey
    2016 “The illusion of common ground.” New Ideas in Psychology42: 56–63
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cowley, Stephen , and Luarina Nash
    2013 “Language, interactivity and solution probing: repetition without repetition.” Adaptive Behavior21(3): 187–198.10.1177/1059712313482804
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712313482804 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dewey, John
    1896 “The reflex arc concept in psychology.” Psychological Review3 (4): 357–70.10.1037/h0070405
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070405 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fester, Marie-Theres
    2015More than Social Interaction: Case Studies of Texting in an Interworld. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Odense: University of Southern Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fuchs, Susanne , Egor Savin , Uwe D. Reichel , Cornelia Ebert , and Manfred Krifka
    2017 “Letter replication as prosodic amplification in social media” Paper presented atPhonetics and Phonology in German speaking areas, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Garrison, Randy D. , Terry Anderson , and Walter Archer
    2000 “Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education” The Internet and Higher Education2 (2–3): 87–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gibson, James J.
    1979The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Goffman, Erving
    1983 “The interaction order.” American Sociological Review48 (1): 1–17.10.2307/2095141
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2095141 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gooch, Daniel , and Leon Watts
    2014 “Social Presence and the void in distant relationships: How do people use communication technologies to turn absence into fondness of the heart, rather than drifting out of mind?” AI & Society, 29 (4): 507–519.10.1007/s00146‑013‑0492‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0492-9 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gunawardena, Charlotte N.
    1995 “Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences” International Journal of Educational Telecommunications1(2/3): 147–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Harrison, Marissa A. , and Angela L. Gilmore
    2012 “U txt WHEN? College students’ social contexts of text messaging.” The Social Science Journal49 (4): 513–518.10.1016/j.soscij.2012.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2012.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  21. Heft, Harry
    2001Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Heritage, John
    1998 “Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry” Language in Society27 (3): 291–334.10.1017/S0047404500019990
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500019990 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hollan, James , Edwin Hutchins , and David Kirsh
    2000 “Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)7 (2): 174–196.10.1145/353485.353487
    https://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jensen, Thomas W.
    2014 “Emotion in languaging: languaging as affective, adaptive, and flexible behavior in social interaction” Frontiers in Psychology5: 720.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00720
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00720 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kravchenko, Alexander V.
    2007 “Essential properties of language, or, why language is not a code”. Language Sciences29 (5): 650–71.10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kreijns, Karel , Frederik van Acker , Marjan Vermeulen , and Hans van Buuren
    2014 ”Community of Inquiry: social presence revisited” E-Learning and Digital Media11 (1): 5–18.10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.5
    https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuru, Ozan , Joseph Bayer , Josh Pazek , and Scott W. Campbell
    2017 “Understanding and measuring mobile Facebook use: Who, why, and how?” Mobile Media & Communication5 (1): 102–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. König, Katharina
    2015 “Dialogkonstitution und Sequenzmuster in der SMS-und WhatsApp-Kommunikation“. Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique63: 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Laursen, Ditte
    2006 Det mobile samtalerum: Unges kommunikations-og samværsformer via mobiltelefonen. [Mobile spaces of communication: Modes of mobile phone communication among teenagers]” Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, Odense: University of Southern Denmark.
  30. Linell, Per
    2009Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, N. C.: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Love, Nigel
    2004 “Cognition and the Language Myth.” Language Sciences26 (6): 525–544.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lowenthal, Patrick R.
    2009 “Social presence” InEncyclopedia of Distance Learning (2nd ed.) ed. by Patricia Rogers , Gary Berg , Judith Boettcher , Carole Howard , Lorraine Justice , and Karen Schenk , 1900–1906. Hershey, Penna. and London: Information Science Reference10.4018/978‑1‑60566‑198‑8.ch280
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-198-8.ch280 [Google Scholar]
  33. Maturana, Humberto
    1978 “Biology of language: The epistemology of reality” InPsychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honor of Eric Linneberg, ed. by George A. Miller & Elizabeth Linneberg , 27–63. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Noë, Alva
    2004Action in perception. Cambridge, Mass. and London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2012Varieties of presence. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674063013
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674063013 [Google Scholar]
  36. O’Regan, J. Kevin , and Alva Noë
    2001 “A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness” Behavioral and Brain Sciences24 (5): 939–73.10.1017/S0140525X01000115
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000115 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pedersen, Sarah B.
    2015 The cognitive ecology of human errors in emergency medicine. An interactvity-based approach. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, Odense: University of Southern Denmark.
  38. Port, Robert F.
    2010 “Rich memory and distributed phonology” Language Sciences32 (1): 43–55.10.1016/j.langsci.2009.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2009.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  39. Rice, Ronald E. , and Gail Love
    1987 “Electronic emotion socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network.” Communication Research14 (1): 85–108.10.1177/009365087014001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014001005 [Google Scholar]
  40. Rommetveit, Ragnar
    2003 “On the role of “a psychology of the second person” in studies of meaning, language, and mind.” Mind, Culture, and Activity10: 205–218.10.1207/s15327884mca1003_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca1003_3 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language50 (4): 696–735.10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2015 “Conversational Interaction The Embodiment of Human Sociality.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd ed.), ed. by Deborah Tannen , Heidi E. Hamilton , and Deborah Schiffrin , 346–366. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Short, John , Ederyn Williams , and Bruce Christie
    1976The social psychology of telecommunications. London & New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sperber, Dan , and Deirdre Wilson
    1995Relevance: Communication & Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Steffensen, Sune V.
    2013 “Human Interactivity: Problem-Solving, Solution-Probing and Verbal Patterns in the Wild” InCognition beyond the brain: Computation, Interactivity and Human Artifice, ed. by Stephen J. Cowley and Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau , 195–221. London: Springer.10.1007/978‑1‑4471‑5125‑8_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5125-8_11 [Google Scholar]
  46. Steffensen, Sune V. , and Sarah Bro Pedersen
    2014  “Temporal dynamics in human interaction.” Cybernetics & Human Knowing21 (1–2): 80–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Tagg, Caroline
    2016 “Heteroglossia in text‐messaging: Performing identity and negotiating relationships in a digital space.” Journal of Sociolinguistics20(1): 59–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Tagg, Caroline , Rachel Hu , Agnieszka Lyons , and James Simpson
    2016 “Heritage and social media in superdiverse cities: personalised, networked and multimodal.” Working Papers in Translanguaging and Translation (WP17). (www.birmingham.ac.uk/generic/tlang/index.aspx)
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Thibault, Paul J.
    2011 “First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: the distributed language view” Ecological Psychology23 (3): 210–245.10.1080/10407413.2011.591274
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2011.591274 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tu, Chih-Hsiung , Marina McIsaac , Laura Sujo-Montes , and Shadow Armfield
    2012 “Is there a mobile social presence?” Educational Media International49 (4): 247–261.10.1080/09523987.2012.741195
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2012.741195 [Google Scholar]
  51. Vilhauer, Ruvanee. P.
    2016 “Inner reading voices: An overlooked form of inner speech“. Psychosis8(1), 37–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Walther, Joseph B.
    1992 “Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction a relational perspective”. Communication Research19 (1): 52–90.10.1177/009365092019001003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003 [Google Scholar]
  53. 1996 “Computer-mediated communication impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction”. Communication Research23 (1): 3–43.10.1177/009365096023001001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001 [Google Scholar]
  54. 2007 “Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition”. Computers in Human Behavior23 (5): 2538–2557.10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  55. Warren, William H.
    2006 “The dynamics of perception and action.” Psychological Review113 (2): 358–89.10.1037/0033‑295X.113.2.358
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.358 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.15067.fes
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ps.15067.fes
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error