Volume 10, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1878-9714
  • E-ISSN: 1878-9722
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This study provides a synthesized perspective on the functions and ideological orientation of time adverbials as (re)situated in their socio-political contexts in five speeches by the Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at the UN. By analysing adverbials of truncated, extending, and fixed time references, the study reveals some systematic ideological formulations of conflict and resolution in the Palestinian political discourse. Adverbials of truncated and extending time are incongruous and generate a sense of interpretive dissonance. The truncated sense is embedded and more particular, thus counteracting the extending time which is established as more progressive, perseverant and consistent. This represents power asymmetries and different ideological orientations to conflict and resolution. Adverbials of fixed time, however, are transformative; they grant an end to a clash of ideologies due to the conflict between truncated and extending temporalities, and therefore resurrect a discourse that is based on equity and justice.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Abuarrah, Sufyan
    2016 “Now’: a marker to a different mental representation and proximization of threat”. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics42(2): 195–218. 10.1080/03740463.2016.1216774
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2016.1216774 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aggestam, Karin & Annika Björkdahl
    2011 “Just peace postponed: Unending peace process and frozen conflicts”. JAD-PbP Working Paper 10. Retrieved fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/260320358_Just_Peace_Postponed_Unending_peace_processes_frozen_conflicts
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Androutsopoulos, Iannis
    2002Natural language processing: Exploring time, tense and aspect in natural language database interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/nlp.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.6 [Google Scholar]
  4. Badarin, Emile
    2016Palestinian Political Discourse: Between Exile and Occupation. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315656755
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315656755 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bazzi, Samia
    2009Arab News and Conflict: A Multidisciplinary Discourse Study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.34
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.34 [Google Scholar]
  6. Benovsky, Jiri
    2010 “The Relationist and Substantivalist Theories of Time: Foes or Friends?” European Journal of Philosophy19(4): 491–506. 10.1111/j.1468‑0378.2010.00396.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2010.00396.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1991Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bühler, Karl
    1982 “ The Deictic Field of Language and Deictic Words ”. In: Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, ed. by Robert Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein , 9–30. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chilton, Paul
    2004Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chilton, Paul & Christina Schäffner
    2002 Introduction: Themes and Principles in the Analysis of Political Discourse. InPolitics as Text and Talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse, eds. by Paul Chilton & Christina Schäffner , 1–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.4.03chi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.03chi [Google Scholar]
  11. Daniton, Barry
    2014Space and Time. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Eagleton, Terry
    2014Ideology. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315843469
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315843469 [Google Scholar]
  13. Evans, Vyvyan
    2005The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fairclough, Norman & Ruth Wodak
    1997 Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by Teun van Dijk , 258–284. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fairclough, Norman
    1989Language and Power. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2013Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of language. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315834368
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fillmore, Charles
    1971 “Towards a Theory of Deixis”. Working Papers on Linguistics, University of Hawaii.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Foucault, Michel
    1982 “The subject and power”. Critical Inquiry8(4): 777–795. 10.1086/448181
    https://doi.org/10.1086/448181 [Google Scholar]
  19. Frawley, William
    1992Linguistic Semantics. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Freeden, Michael
    2003Ideology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/actrade/9780192802811.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192802811.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fricke, Ellen
    2002 “Origo, Pointing and Speech: The Impact of co-speech gestures on linguistic Deixis Theory”. Gesture2(2): 207–226. 10.1075/gest.2.2.05fri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.05fri [Google Scholar]
  22. Grzymala-Busse, Anna
    2011 “Time Will Tell? Temporality and the Analysis of Causal Mechanisms and Processes”. Comparative Political Studies44(9): 1267–1297. 10.1177/0010414010390653
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010390653 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hanks, William
    2009 “Fieldwork on Deixis”. Journal of Pragmatics41: 10–24. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    2008Particles at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues: A Study with Special Reference for the French Phrasal Adverbs. The University of Manchester.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hill, Tom
    2008 “After Oslo: Truth and Reconciliation in the Palestinian Discourse”. Mediterranean Politics13(2): 110–127. 10.1080/13629390802127505
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13629390802127505 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hirtle, Walter
    1977 “Already, Still and Yet”. Archivum Linguisticum8: 28–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Horn, Laurence
    1970 “Aint it Hard Anymore”. In: Papers from the Sixth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, ed. by M. A. Campbell , 318–328, Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hyatt, David
    2005 “Time for a Change: A Critical Discoursal Analysis of Synchronic Context with Diachronic Relevance”. Discourse and Society16(4): 515–534. 10.1177/0957926505053054
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505053054 [Google Scholar]
  29. Jamal, Amal
    2016 “Conflict Theory, Temporality, and Transformative Temporariness: Lessons from Israel and Palestine”. Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory23(3): 365–377. 10.1111/1467‑8675.12210
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12210 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kimmerle, Heinz
    1996 “How to repeat what never has been?” InTime and Temporality in Intercultural Perspective, ed. by Douwe Tiemersma & Henk Oosterling , 1–11. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Klein, Wolfgang
    2009 How Time is Encoded. InThe Expression of Time, eds. by Wolfgang Klein & Ping Li , 39–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199031.39
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199031.39 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2013Time in Language. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315003801
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315003801 [Google Scholar]
  33. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2006 Deixis. InThe Handbook of Pragmatics, eds. by Laurence Horn & Gregory Ward , 97–122. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756959.ch5
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959.ch5 [Google Scholar]
  35. Machover, Moshé
    2012Israelis and Palestinians: Conflict and Resolution. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mall, Ram Adhar
    1996 Time Arrow Within the Bounds of Cyclic Time. InTime and Temporality in Intercultural Perspective, eds. by. Douwe Tiemersma & Henk Oosterling , 65–75. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. McDowell, Sara , & Maire Braniff
    2014Commemoration as Conflict: Space, Memory and Identity in Peace Processes. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137314857
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314857 [Google Scholar]
  38. McMahon, Sean
    2016 “Temporality, Peace Initiatives and Palestinian-Israeli Politics”. Middle East Critique25: 1–7. 10.1080/19436149.2015.1107997
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2015.1107997 [Google Scholar]
  39. Michaelis, Laura
    1993 “Continuity within Three Scalar Models: The Polysemy of Adverbial still”. Journal of Semantics10: 193–237. 10.1093/jos/10.3.193
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/10.3.193 [Google Scholar]
  40. Pappé, Ilan
    2006The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. Oxford: One World Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Peteet, Julie
    2017Space and mobility in Palestine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1zxxznh
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1zxxznh [Google Scholar]
  42. Piwek, Paul , Robbert-Jan Beun & Anita Cremers
    2008 “Proximal’ and ‘Distal’ in Language and Cognition: Evidence from Deictic Demonstratives in Dutch”. Journal of Pragmatics40(4): 694–718. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  43. Rauh, Gisa
    1983 Aspects of Deixis. InEssays on Deixis, ed. by Gisa Rauh , 9–61. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Suleiman, Ramzi
    2002 On Marginal People: The Case of the Palestinians in Israel. InPsychoanalysis, Identity and Ideology: Critical essays on the Israeli/Palestinian Case, eds. by John Bunzl & Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi , 71–83. New York: Springer Science and Business Media. 10.1007/978‑1‑4757‑6324‑9_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6324-9_4 [Google Scholar]
  45. Therborn, Göran
    1980The Ideology of Power and Power of Ideology. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. van Dijk, Teun
    1984Prejudice in Discourse: An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.v.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.v.3 [Google Scholar]
  47. 1995a Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis. InLanguage and Peace, ed. by Anita Wenden and Christina Schäffner , 17–33. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 1995b “Ideological Discourse Analysis”. The New Courant4: 135–161.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 1998Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2011Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Sage. 10.4135/9781446289068
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446289068 [Google Scholar]
  51. Vendler, Zeno
    1967Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Whitrow, Gerald J.
    1972What is Time? The Classic Account of the Nature of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Wolf, Eric
    1990 “Facing Power: Old Insights, New questions”. American Anthropology92: 586–596. 10.1525/aa.1990.92.3.02a00020
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1990.92.3.02a00020 [Google Scholar]
  54. 1999Envisioning Power: Ideologies of Dominance and Crisis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Yule, George
    1996Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): adverbials; ideology; language function; political discourse; power; temporality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error