“Well would you believe it, I have failed the exam again”

References

1. Aijmer, Karin
   (ed) 2009 Contrastive Pragmatics. Special Issue ofLanguages in Contrast9(1).
   [Google Scholar]
2. Asher, Nicholas , and Alex Lascarides
   2003 Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: CUP.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Asher, Nicholas , and Laure Vieu
   2005 “Subordinating and coordinating discourse relations.” Lingua115: 591–610. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.017
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.017 [Google Scholar]
4. Beaugrande, Robert de , and Wolfgang Dressler
   1981 Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783111349305
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111349305 [Google Scholar]
5. Berzlánovich, Ildikó , and Gisela Redeker
   2012 “Genre-dependent interaction of coherence and lexical cohesion in written discourse.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory8(1): 183–208. doi: 10.1515/cllt‑2012‑0008
   https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2012-0008 [Google Scholar]
6. Bublitz, Wolfram , Uta Lenk , and Eija Ventola
   (eds) 1999 Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.63
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.63 [Google Scholar]
7. Chafe, Wallace L.
   1982 “Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature.” InSpoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, ed. by Deborah Tannen , 35–53. Norwood: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chesterman, Andrew
   1998 Contrastive Functional Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.47
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.47 [Google Scholar]
9. Coates, Jennifer
   2003 Men Talk: Stories in the Making of Masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470755617
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755617 [Google Scholar]
10. De Fina, Anna , and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
    2008 “Introduction: Narrative Analysis in the Shift from Texts to Practices.” Text & Talk28: 275–281. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2008.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.013 [Google Scholar]
11. Duranti, Alessandro
    2006 “Narrating the Political Self in a Campaign for U.S. Congress.” Language in Society35: 467–497. doi: 10.1017/S0047404506060222
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060222 [Google Scholar]
12. Fetzer, Anita
    2008 “Theme zones in English media discourse. Forms and functions.” Journal of Pragmatics40(9): 1543–1568. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.016 [Google Scholar]
13. Fetzer, Anita
    2013 “Structuring of discourse.” InHandbooks of Pragmatics. The Pragmatics of Speech Actions. Vol.2., ed. by Marina Sbisà and Ken Turner , 685–711. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110214383.685
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214383.685 [Google Scholar]
14. Fetzer, Anita
    2016 “Discourse relations across discourse genres. Degrees of overtness in argumentative and narrative texts.” IWoDa’ 16, Santiago de Compostela, 29–30Sept. 2016, 14–17.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fetzer, Anita , and Augustin Speyer
    2012 “Discourse Relations in English and German Discourse: Local and Not-So-Local Constraints.” Intercultural Pragmatics9: 413–452. doi: 10.1515/ip‑2012‑0025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2012-0025 [Google Scholar]
16. Givón, Talmy
    1993 English Grammar: a Function-Based Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gómez-González, María
    2001 The Theme-Topic Interface. Evidence from English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.71
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.71 [Google Scholar]
18. Grosz, Barbara , and Candace Sidner
    1986 “Attention, Intentions and the Structure of Discourse.” Computational Linguistics12: 175–204.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1994 Introduction to English Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Halliday, Michael , and Ruqaiya Hasan
    1987 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Höhle, Tilman
    1986 “Der Begriff ‘Mittelfeld’. Anmerkungen über die Theorie der topologischen Felder.“ InKontroversen, alte und neue. Akten des 7. Internationalen Germanistenkongresses Göttingen 1985, ed. by Albrecht Schöne , 329–340. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hunston, Susan
    2007 “Using a Corpus to Investigate Stance Quantitatively and Qualitatively”. InStancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson , 27–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.164.03hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.03hun [Google Scholar]
23. Johnstone, Barbara
    2003 “Discourse Analysis and Narrative.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin , Deborah Tannen , and Heidi Hamilton , 634–649. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Knott, Alistair , and Ted Sanders
    1998 “The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages.” Journal of Pragmatics30: 135–175. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00023‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00023-X [Google Scholar]
25. Krzeszowki, Tomasz
    1989 “Towards a typology of contrastive studies”. InContrastive Pragmatics, ed. by Wieslaw Oleksy , 55–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kunz, Kerstin , Stefania Degaetano-Ortlieb , Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski , Katrin Menzel , and Erich Steiner
    2007 “English-German contrasts in cohesion and implications for translation.” InEmpirical Translation Studies. New Methodological and Theoretical Traditions, ed. by Gert De Sutter , Marie-Aude Lefer , and Isabelle Delaere , 265–312. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kunz, Kerstin , and Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski
    . Forthcoming. “Conjunctions in source and target texts: A corpus-based analysis of English and German.” InCorpus-based Approaches to Discourse Relations ed. by Kerstin Kunz and Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski . To appear as a Special Issue ofDiscours. Revue de linguistique, psycholinguistique et informatique.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Labov, William
    1972 Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Levinson, Stephen
    1979 “Activity types and language.” Linguistics17: 365–399. doi: 10.1515/ling.1979.17.5‑6.365
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1979.17.5-6.365 [Google Scholar]
30. Linell, Per
    1998 Approaching Dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.3 [Google Scholar]
31. Marcu, Daniel
    2000 “The rhetorical parsing of unrestricted texts: A surface-based approach”. Computational Linguistics26(3): 395–448. doi: 10.1162/089120100561755
    https://doi.org/10.1162/089120100561755 [Google Scholar]
32. Mey, Jacob L.
    2001 Pragmatics. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Pavlenko, Aneta
    2008 “Emotion and Emotion-Laden Words in the Bilingual Lexicon.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition11: 147–164. doi: 10.1017/S1366728908003283
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003283 [Google Scholar]
34. Sarangi, Srikant
    2000 “Activity types, discourse types and interactional hybridity: the case of genetic counselling.” InDiscourse and Social Life, ed. by Srikant Sarangi and Malcolm Coulthard , 1–27. London: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Schilder, Frank
    1997 Temporal Relations in English and German Narrative Discourse. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
36. Selting, Margret
    2010 “Affectivity in Conversational Storytelling: An Analysis of Displays of Anger or Indignation in Complaint Stories.” Pragmatics20(2): 229–277. doi: 10.1075/prag.20.2.06sel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20.2.06sel [Google Scholar]
37. Speyer, Augustin , and Anita Fetzer
    2014 “The Coding of Discourse Relations in English and German Argumentative Discourse.” InThe Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence, ed. by Helmut Gruber and Gisela Redeker , 87–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Steiner, Erich
    2015 “Contrastive studies of cohesion and their impact on our knowledge of translation.” InDiscourse Analysis and Translation. Special issue ofTARGET, ed. by Meifang Zhang and Jeremy Munday . International Journal of Translation Studies27(3): 351–369.10.1075/target.27.3.02ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.27.3.02ste [Google Scholar]
39. Taboada, Maite , Mario Carretero , and Jennifer Hinnell
    2014 “Loving and Hating the Movies in English, German and Spanish.” Contrastive Linguistics14: 127–161.10.1075/lic.14.1.07tab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.14.1.07tab [Google Scholar]
40. Tan, Ed
    1994 “Story Processing as an Emotion Episode.” InNaturalistic Text Comprehension, ed. by Herre van Oostendorp and Rolf A. Zwaan , 165–188. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Teich, Elke
    2003 Cross-Linguistic Variation in System und Text. A Methodology for the Investigation of Translations and Comparable Texts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110896541
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110896541 [Google Scholar]
42. Thibault, Paul
    2003 “Contextualization and social meaning-making practices.” InLanguage and Interaction. Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by Susan L. Eerdmans , Carlo L. Prevignano , and Paul J. Thibault , 41–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.117.05thi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.117.05thi [Google Scholar]
43. Thurmair, Maria
    1989 Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783111354569
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111354569 [Google Scholar]
44. Widdowson, Henry
    2004 Text, Context, and Pretext. Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470758427
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758427 [Google Scholar]