Evidentials as a mark of genre

References

1. Abouda, Lotfi
   2001 “Les emplois journalistique, polémique et atténuatif du conditionnel. Un traitement unitaire”. InLe conditionnel en français, ed. by P. Dendale and L. Tasmowski , 277–294. Paris: Klincksieck.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
   2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
   2007 “Information source and evidentiality: what can we conclude?” Rivista di Linguistica19(1): 209–227.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Albelda, Marta
   2016 “La expression de la evidencialidad en ‘se ve (que)’ ”. Spanish in context13(2): 237–262.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Alonso-Almeida, Francisco
   2014 “Evidential and epistemic devices in English and Spanish medical, computing and legal scientific abstracts: A contrastive study”. InAbstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change, ed. by M. Bondi and R. Lorés , 21–42. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Alonso-Almeida, Francisco
   2015 “On the mitigating function of modality and evidentiality. Evidence from English and Spanish medical research papers”. Intercultural Pragmatics12(1): 33–57.10.1515/ip‑2015‑0002
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2015-0002 [Google Scholar]
7. Anderson, Lloyd B.
   1986 “Evidentials, paths of change and mental maps: typologically regular asymmetries”. InEvidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, ed. by W. Chafe and J. Nichols , 273–312. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing,
   [Google Scholar]
8. Barros, Pedro et al.
   2012  cogila: español oral conversacional. Granada: University of Granada.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bermúdez, Fernando
   2005 Evidencialidad. La codificación lingüística del punto de vista. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Blas, José-Luis
    2009 “Interpersonal issues in political discourse”. InHandbook of Pragmatics, ed. by M. Locher and S. L. Graham , 405–434. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Boye, Kasper
    2010 “Evidence for what? Evidentiality and scope”. STUF-Language Typology and Universals63(4): 290–307.10.1524/stuf.2010.0023
    https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2010.0023 [Google Scholar]
12. Boye, Kasper , and Peter Harder
    2009 “Evidentiality: Linguistic categories and grammaticalization.” Functions of Language16(1): 9–43.10.1075/fol.16.1.03boy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.03boy [Google Scholar]
13. Brenes, Ester
    2010 “Evidencialidad, aserción y (des)cortesía verbal: el receptor como garante de lo dicho”. Español actual93: 7–28.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Briz, Antonio
    2001 El español coloquial en la conversación. Esbozo de pragmagramática. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chafe, Wallace
    1986 “Evidentiality in English Conversation and academic writing”. InEvidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, ed. by W. Chafe and J. Nichols , 261–272. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cornillie, Bert
    2007 Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Spanish (semi)auxiliaries. A Cognitive-functional Approach. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cornillie, Bert , and Pedro Gras
    2015 “On the interactional dimension of evidentials: The case of the Spanish evidential discourse markers.” Discourse Studies17(2): 141–161.10.1177/1461445614564518
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614564518 [Google Scholar]
18. De Haan, Ferdinand
    2001 “The place of inference within the evidential system”. International Journal of American Linguistics67(2): 193–219.10.1086/466455
    https://doi.org/10.1086/466455 [Google Scholar]
19. Dehkordi, Mojdeh , and Hamid Allami
    2012 “Evidentiality in Academic Writing”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies2(9): 1895–1904.10.4304/tpls.2.9.1895‑1904
    https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.9.1895-1904 [Google Scholar]
20. Diewald, Gabriele , and Elena Smirnova
    2010 “Introduction. Evidentiality in European languages: the lexical-grammatical distinction. InLinguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by G. Diewald and E. Smirnova , 1–14. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110223972.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223972.1 [Google Scholar]
21. Estellés, María
    2015 “Expressing evidentiality through prosody? Prosodic voicing in reported speech in Spanish colloquial conversations”. Journal of Pragmatics85: 138–154.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.04.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.04.012 [Google Scholar]
22. Estellés, María
    (this volume). “What genres tell us about evidentials and vice versa: A study of al parecer in Spanish parliamentary debates (1979–2015)”.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Estellés, María , and Marta Albelda
    2014 “Evidentials, politeness and prosody in Spanish: A corpus analysis.” Journal of Politeness Research10 (1): 29–62.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Estellés, María , and Marta Albelda
    2017 “Evidencialidad, atenuación y descortesía en al parecer y por lo visto. Influencias del género discursivo”. InGramática, semántica y pragmática de la evidencialidad, ed. by B. Cornillie . 169–201. EUNSA: Universidad de Navarra.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Estellés, María, and Marta Albelda
    2018 “On the dynamicity of evidential scales. Pragmatic indirectness in evidentiality as a rhetoric strategy in academic and political discourse”. InPerspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish, ed. byC. Figueras and A. Cabedo, 25–48. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Estrada, Andrea
    2008 “¿Reforzador o atenuador? ‘Evidentemente’ como adverbio evidencial”. Sintagma20: 37–52.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Figueras, Carolina
    (2017): “La relevancia de los adverbios evidenciales”. InGramática, semántica y pragmática de la evidencialidad, ed. by B. Cornillie . 129–167. EUNSA: Universidad de Navarra.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Frawley, William
    1992 Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Fuentes, Catalina
    2012 “Introduction. ‘Discurso parlamentario y género. Perspectivas de investigación’”. Revista iberoamericana de discurso y sociedad6: 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Garrido-Medina, Joaquín
    2007 “Construcción de discurso en noticias de prensa”. Revista española de lingüística37: 139–168.
    [Google Scholar]
31. González-Condom, Montserrat
    (ed) 2015 Evidential and espistemic strategies in discourse. A cross-linguistic perspective. Discourse Studies17(2) (Special Issue).
    [Google Scholar]
32. González-Condom, Montserrat , Paolo Roseano , Joan Borràs-Comes & Pilar Prieto
    2017 “Epistemic and evidential textures in discourse: effects of register and debatability”. Lingua186–7: 68–87.
    [Google Scholar]
33. González-Ramos, Elisa
    2005 “ Por lo visto y al parecer: comparación de dos locuciones modales epistémicas de evidencialidad en español actual”. Interlingüística16(1): 541–554.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hassler, Gerda
    2010 “Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis. The case of Romance languages”. InLinguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by G. Diewald and E. Smirnova , 223–247. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Hernández-Flores, Nieves
    2004 “Politeness as ‘face’ enhancement: an analysis of Spanish conversations between family and friends. InCurrent trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, ed. by R. Márquez-Reiter and M. Placencia , 265–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.123.21her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.123.21her [Google Scholar]
36. Hyland, Ken
    2000 Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hyland, Ken
    2005 Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    [Google Scholar]
38. Ilie, Cornelia
    2001 “Unparliamentary language: insults as cognitive forms of confrontation”. InLanguage and Ideology, ed. by R. Dirven , R. Frank and C. Ilie , 235–263. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.205.14ili
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.205.14ili [Google Scholar]
39. Ilie, Cornelia
    (ed.) 2010 European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.38
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.38 [Google Scholar]
40. Kotwica, Dorota
    2013 “Los valores del significado de la partícula evidencial al parecer: la atenuación y el efecto de disociación”. InEstudios de lingüística: investigaciones, propuestas y aplicaciones, ed. by Adrián Cabedo Nebot , Manuel José Aguilar Ruiz & Elena López-Navarro Vidal , 403–410. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kotwica, Dorota
    2015 “Evidential al parecer: Between the physical and the cognitive meaning in Spanish scientific prose of the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries” Journal of Pragmatics85: 155–167.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.021 [Google Scholar]
42. Kotwica, Dorota
    (this volume). “Does the source matter? Specificity in reportative evidentiality in Spanish scientific discourse (1799–1920)”.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Locher, Miriam , and Richard Watts
    2005 “Politeness Theory and Relational Work”. Journal of Politeness Research1(1): 9–3310.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9 [Google Scholar]
44. Locher, Miriam , and Richard Watts
    2008 “Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour”. InImpoliteness in language. Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, ed. by D. Bousfield and M. Locher , 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Marcos, Mercedes
    2005 A propósito del marcador por lo visto . InPalabras, norma, discurso, ed. by Luis Santos Río , Julio Borrego Nieto , Juan Felipe García Santos , José J. Gómez Asencio , and Emilio Prieto de los Mozos , 777–785. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Marcos, Mercedes
    2006 “Evidencialidad y género discursivo”. InAnálisis del discurso: lengua, cultura, valores, ed. by Manuel Casado Velarde , Ramon Gonzalez Ruiz & M.ª Victoria Romero Gualda , 579–592. Madrid: Arco Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Marín-Arrese, Juana
    2004 “Evidential and epistemic qualifications in the discourse of fact and opinion”. InPerspectives on Evidentiality and Modality, ed. by J. Marín-Arrese , 153–184. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Mushin, Ilana
    2001 Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance. Narrative Retelling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.87
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.87 [Google Scholar]
49. Rodríguez, Rosa
    2011 “La información de sucesos: temática en prensa escrita”. Correspondencias & Análisis1: 309–325
    [Google Scholar]
50. Squartini, Mario
    (ed) 2008 “Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian”. Linguistics46(5): 917–947.10.1515/LING.2008.030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.030 [Google Scholar]
51. Swales, John
    1990 Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Swales, John
    2004 Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524827
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
53. Vatrican, Axelle
    2010 “La modalité et le conditionnel de rumeur en espagnol et en français”. Modèles linguistiques, XXXI(62): 83–94.10.4000/ml.231
    https://doi.org/10.4000/ml.231 [Google Scholar]
54. Whitt, Richard
    2011 “(Inter)Subjectivity and evidential perception verbs in English and German”. Journal of Pragmatics43: 347–360.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.015 [Google Scholar]