Interactional metadiscourse of gender in Persian

References

1. Ädel, Annelie
   2006 Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.24
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.24 [Google Scholar]
2. Arundale, Robert B.
   2006 “Face as relational and interactional: a communication framework for research on face, face work and politeness.” Journal of Politeness Research2: 193–216. 10.1515/PR.2006.011
   https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2006.011 [Google Scholar]
3. Baker, Paul
   2008 Language, Gender and Sexuality. London: Equinox.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, Paul and Giuseppe Balirano
   (eds) 2018 Queering Masculinities in Language and Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑349‑95327‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95327-1 [Google Scholar]
5. Beeman, William O.
   1986 Language, Status and Power in Iran. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bergvall, Victoria L.
   1999 “Towards a comprehensive theory of language and gender.’ Language in Society28:273–293. 10.1017/S0047404599002080
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599002080 [Google Scholar]
7. Chafe, Wallace L.
   1982 “Integration and Involvement in Speaking, Writing and Oral Literature.” InSpoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, ed. byDeborah Tannen, 35–53. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Coates, Jennifer
   (ed) 1998 Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Wiley.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Coates, Jennifer
   2016 Women, Men, and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender differences in Language. (3rd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Crismore, Avon
    1984 “The rhetoric of textbooks: Metadiscourse” Journal of Curriculum Studies16 (3): 279–296. 10.1080/0022027840160306
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027840160306 [Google Scholar]
11. Crismore, Avon, Raija Markkanen, and Margaret S. Steffensen
    1993 “Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students.” Written Communication10 (1): 39–71. 10.1177/0741088393010001002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002 [Google Scholar]
12. Dudley-Evans, Tony
    1994 “Genre Analysis: An Approach to Text Analysis for ESP.” InAdvances in Written Text Analysis, ed. byMalcolm Coulthard, 219–28. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet
    1992 “Think practically and look locally: language and gender as community-based practice.” Annual Review of Anthropology21: 461–90. 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333 [Google Scholar]
14. Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet
    2003 Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791147
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791147 [Google Scholar]
15. Ehlich, Susan, Miriam Meyerhoff, and Janet Holmes
    2014 The Handbook of language, Gender and Sexuality. (2nd edn.) Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584248
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584248 [Google Scholar]
16. Foucault, Michel
    1980 Power, knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. Translated byColin Gordon. Brighton: Harvester Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Francis, Becky, Jocelyn Robson and Barbara Read
    2001 “An analysis of undergraduate writing styles in the context of gender and achievement.” Studies in Higher Education26 (3): 313–26. 10.1080/03075070120076282
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120076282 [Google Scholar]
18. Goffman, Erving
    1981 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Anchor.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Holmes, Janet
    1988 “Paying compliments: a sex-preferred positive politeness strategy.” Journal of Pragmatics12 (3): 445–65. 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90005‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90005-7 [Google Scholar]
20. Holmes, Janet and Miriam Meyerhoff
    1999 “The community of practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research.” Language in Society28(2): 173–83. 10.1017/S004740459900202X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740459900202X [Google Scholar]
21. Hyland, Ken
    1996 “Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles.” Written Communication13 (2): 251–81. 10.1177/0741088396013002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088396013002004 [Google Scholar]
22. Hyland, Ken
    1998 “Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO’s letter.” Journal of Business Communication35(2): 224–45. 10.1177/002194369803500203
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369803500203 [Google Scholar]
23. Hyland, Ken and Polly Tse
    2004 “Metadiscourse in academic writing: a reappraisal.” Applied Linguistics25 (2): 156–77. 10.1093/applin/25.2.156
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156 [Google Scholar]
24. Hyland, Ken
    2005 Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger
    1991 Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
26. Levon, Erez and Ronald Beline Mendes
    (eds) 2016 Language, Sexuality and Power: Studies in Intersectional Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lakoff, Robin
    1975 Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
28. McIlvenny, Paul
    (ed) 2002 Talking Gender and Sexuality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.94
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.94 [Google Scholar]
29. Mills, Sara
    2002 “Rethinking politeness, impoliteness and gender identity.” InGender Identity and Discourse Analysis, ed. byLia Litosseliti and Jane Sunderland, 69–90. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.2.04mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.2.04mil [Google Scholar]
30. Mills, Sara
    2003 Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615238
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238 [Google Scholar]
31. Mumby, Dennis K. and Cynthia Stohl
    1991 “Power and discourse in organization studies: Absence and the dialectic of control.” Discourse and Society2 (3): 313–32. 10.1177/0957926591002003004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926591002003004 [Google Scholar]
32. Ochs, Elinor
    1992 “Indexing Gender.” InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. byAlessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 335–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth and Shirley Carter-Thomas
    2005 “The rhetoric of conference presentation introductions: Context, argument and interaction.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics15(1): 45–70. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2005.00080.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2005.00080.x [Google Scholar]
34. Simpson, Paul, and Andrea Mayr
    2010 Language and Power: a Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Sutton, Laurel A.
    (ed) 2017 Context Counts: Papers on Language, Gender and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Swales, John M.
    2003 “Review of language of conferencing.” Applied Linguistics24 (4): 549–51. 10.1093/applin/24.4.549
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.549 [Google Scholar]
37. Talbot, Mary M.
    2010 Language and Gender. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Tannen, Deborah
    (ed) 1993 Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Tannen, Deborah
    1994 Gender and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Taromi, Tahereh, Giti Taki, and Pakzad Yusifian
    . 2018. “Gensiat dar maqalat e’lmi farsizaban: motale’h peikareh-bonyad nashangarhaye fara-goftamanu” [Gender in the Persian scientific articles: A corpus study of metadiscourse markers].” Pazhuashhaye Zabanshanasi [Researches in Linguistics] 10(1): 23–42.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Thompson, G.
    2001 “Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader.” Applied Linguistics22(1): 58–78. 10.1093/applin/22.1.58
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.58 [Google Scholar]
42. Thompson, Paul
    2002 “Modal Verbs in Academic Writing.” InTeaching and Learning by Doing Corpus Analysis: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora. ed. byBerhard Kettemann and Georg Marko, 305–324. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004334236_023
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004334236_023 [Google Scholar]
43. Vande Kopple, William J.
    1985 Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication26: 82–93. 10.2307/357609
    https://doi.org/10.2307/357609 [Google Scholar]
44. Ventola, Eija, Celia Shalom, and Susan C. Thompson
    (eds) 2002 The Language of Conferencing. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Zareifard, Raha and Batool Alinezhad
    2014 “A study of interactional metadiscourse markers and gender in the defense seminars of Persian speakers.” Journal of Educational and Social Research4 (1): 231–238.
    [Google Scholar]