An activity theory approach to the contextualization mechanism of language use

References

1. Arrojo, Rosemary
   2005 “The Ethics of Translation in Contemporary Approaches to Translator Training.” InTraining for the New Millennium: Pedagogies for Translation and InterpretingVol.60, edited byMartha Tennent, 226–245. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.60.18arr
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.60.18arr [Google Scholar]
2. Auer, Peter
   1992 “Introduction: John Gumperz’s Approach to Contextualization.” InContextualization of Language, edited byPeter Auer and Aldo Di Luzio, 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.22.03aue
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22.03aue [Google Scholar]
3. Baker, Mona
   2006 “Contextualization in Translator-and Interpreter-Mediated Events.” Journal of Pragmatics38: 321–337. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.010
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.010 [Google Scholar]
4. Beaujour, Elizabeth Klosty
   1995 “Translation and Self-Translation.” InThe Garland Companion to Vladimir Nabokov, edited byVladimir E. Alexandrov, 714–724. New York & London: Garland Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bedny, Gregory, Waldemar Karwowski, and Inna Bedny
   2014 Applying Systemic-Structural Activity Theory to Design of Human-Computer Interaction Systems. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press. 10.1201/b17975
   https://doi.org/10.1201/b17975 [Google Scholar]
6. Booth, Wayne Clayson
   1983 The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226065595.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226065595.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
7. Bühler, Karl
   1990 Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/fos.25
   https://doi.org/10.1075/fos.25 [Google Scholar]
8. Bozalek, Vivienne, Dick Ng’ambi, Denise Wood, Jan Herrington, Joanne Hardman, and Alan Amory
   2014 Activity Theory, Authentic Learning and Emerging Technologies: Towards a Transformative Higher Education Pedagogy. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315771823
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771823 [Google Scholar]
9. Chang, Eileen
   1962 “Little Finger up.” InNew Chinese Stories: Twelve Short Stories by Contemporary Chinese Writers, edited byLucian Wu, 65–82. Taipei: Heritage Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chang, Eileen
    1992 张爱玲文集 第一卷 [Anthology of Eileen Chang, Volume 1]. Hefei: Anhui Literature and Art Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Engeström, Yrjö
    2010 “Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization.” Journal of Education and Work14(1): 133–156. 10.1080/13639080020028747
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747 [Google Scholar]
12. Engeström, Yrjö, and Hannele Keresuo
    2007 “From Workplace Learning to Inter-Organizational Learning and Back: The Contribution of Activity Theory.” Journal of Workplace LearningVol.19 (6): 336–342. 10.1108/13665620710777084
    https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620710777084 [Google Scholar]
13. Fetzer, Anita
    2012 “Context in Interaction.” InWhat is a Context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges, edited byRita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer and Petra B. Schumacher, 105–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.196.08fet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.196.08fet [Google Scholar]
14. Fitch, Brian T.
    1988 Beckett and Babel: An Investigation into the Status of the Bilingual Work. Toronto, Buffalo & London: University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gumperz, John J.
    1992 “Contextualization and Understanding.” InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, edited byAlessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gutt, Ernst-August
    2000 Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Halliday, Michael A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
    1985 Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. House, Juliane
    2006 “Text and Context in Translation.” Journal of Pragmatics38: 338–358. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.021 [Google Scholar]
19. Jarzabkowski, Paula
    2005 Strategy as Practice: An Activity Based Approach. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jarzabkowski, Paula, and Carola Wolf
    2015 “An Activity Theory Approach to Strategy as Practice.” InCambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice (Second Edition), edited byDamon Golsorkhi, David Seidl, and Eero Vaara, 165–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139681032.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139681032.010 [Google Scholar]
21. Kinnunen, Tuija
    2010 “Agency, Activity and Court Interpreting.” InTranslators’ Agency, edited byTuija Kinnunen and Kaisa Koskinen, 125–165. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kuutti, Kari
    1996 “Activity Theory as a Potential Framework for Human-Computer Interaction Research.” InContext and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction, edited byBonnie A. Nardi, 17–45. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lantolf, James
    ed. 2000 Socio-Cultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Leontjev, Aleksei N.
    1978 Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lin, Shu
    1981 “跋[The Afterword].” In黑奴吁天录 [Uncle Tom’s Cabin]. Translated byShu Lin, 206. Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Meibauer, Jörg
    2012 “What is Context: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence.” InWhat is a Context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges, edited byRita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer and Petra B. Schumacher, 9–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.196.04mei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.196.04mei [Google Scholar]
27. Nardi, Bonnie A.
    1996 “Studying Context: A Comparison of Activity Theory, Situated Action Model and Distributed Cognition.” InContext and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction, edited byBonnie A. Nardi, 69–103. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Popovič, Anton
    1976 Dictionary for the Analysis of Literary Translation. Edmonton: University of Alberta.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Reiss, Katharina
    2004 Translation Criticism: The Potentials and Limitations. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sang, Zhonggang
    2011 “An Activity Theory Approach to Translation for a Pedagogical Purpose.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology19 (4): 291–306. 10.1080/0907676X.2011.590591
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2011.590591 [Google Scholar]
31. Sang, Zhonggang
    2014 二十世纪中国作家短篇小说的汉英自译研究 [A Descriptive Study of 20th Century Chinese writers’ [Chinese-English Self-translations of Short-Stories]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Silverstein, Michael
    1992 “The indeterminacy of contextualization: When is enough enough?” InThe contextualization of language, edited byPeter Auer and Aldo Di Luzio, 55–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.22.05sil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22.05sil [Google Scholar]
33. Stowe, Harriet Beecher
    1981 黑奴吁天录 [Uncle Tom’s Cabin]. Translated byShu Lin. Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Stowe, Harriet Beecher
    1982 Uncle Tom’s Cabin. New York: Bantam Books.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Stetsenko, Anna
    2005 “Confronting Analytical Dilemmas for Understanding Complex Human Interactions in Design-Based Research From a Cultural–Historical Activity Theory Framework.” Mind, Culture and Activity12(1): 70–88. 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_6
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca1201_6 [Google Scholar]
36. Stetsenko, Anna, and Igor M. Arievitch
    2014 “Vygotskian Collaborative Project of Social Transformation: History, Politics, and Practice in Knowledge Construction.” InCollaborative Projects: An Interdisciplinary Study, edited byAndy Blunden, 217–238. Leiden & Boston: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
37. The First Historical Archives of China
    The First Historical Archives of China 1996 英使马戛尔尼访华档案史料汇编 [A Collection of Archival Source Materials Concerning the Macartney Mission to China]. Beijing: China International Culture Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Toulmin, Stephen
    1999 “Knowledge as Shared Procedures.” InPerspectives on Activity Theory, edited byYrjö Engeström, Reijo Miettinen, and Raija-Leena Punamäki, 52–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511812774.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.005 [Google Scholar]
39. Toury, Gideon
    1995 Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.4 [Google Scholar]
40. Wertsch, James
    ed. 1979 The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology. New York: N.E. Sharp.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Wong, Lawrence
    2012 “第一次鸦片战争中的译者:英方的译者 [The Translators in the First Opium War: The British Translators].” In翻译史研究 [Studies in Translation History], edited byLawrence Wong, 56–57. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Zhang, Zhaotong (张肇桐)
    1903 自由结婚 [Free Marriage]. Shanghai: Shanghai Free Agency.
    [Google Scholar]